CJOtheReal,

No it doesn’t, the training data isn’t inside the LLM.

So firstly, even if those claims are true, you sue the wrong business, you would need to sue the training data maker. They however are usually protected by laws for science, because they are “non profit research”

Therefore this is completely ridiculous.

Btw, A the copyright part is only a thing if its a significant portion of the thing… Wich it clearly isn’t in this case (its below 1% of it) making it even more ridiculous.

Also, if you can get the information on the internet, you are again suing the wrong place, you should be after the provider, not the automatic data grabbing system… As they can and will argue that they cant control what their algorithm crawler takes. There is a way to mark content as “dont use” for Mashines, but most people don’t do that and will lose in court because they don’t understand it…

Lastly, the training wouldn’t be harder, the problem is the gathering of data. You can’t manually look through all of it and its idiotic to think that its reasonable to demand such a thing.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tech
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • love
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines