naoseiquemsou,

Interesting, it was a variation of embrace, extend, extinguish, without the extend part.

In a way, I think it happened to the entire internet. Look at browsers today, web development (that one might be controversial, but I think big techs somewhat forced bloated frameworks to be the standard way to create websites), video streaming, etc.

parrot-party,
parrot-party avatar

No, extend is a major part of it. That's how they topple community projects. They extend in good faith at first to get everyone locked in, then they extend in nefarious ways to keep the community stuck playing catch-up. Once they've absorbed all the users from the community projects, they kill off back access leaving the community project crippled in users and lost in direction.

Trust me. Facebook will definitely add great things at first but their goal is to draw users out of the fediverse and into Facebook.

furrowsofar,

The biggest issue is who pays for the server infrastructure at scale.

Nomecks,

The Fediverse seems like a good place to implement a distributed, block chain based peering setup. Join a community and share the hosting

QHC,
QHC avatar

OMG why do tech bros try to force blockchain into everything

fiah,
@fiah@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

doesn’t have to be blockchain based, but there should be some sort of incentive for people to take up the burden of hosting (and moderating, I guess) like blockchains have for people to run nodes, or instances will start shutting down eventually when the people who were footing the bill get tired of it. Or maybe I’m wrong and instances will survive on donations and goodwill of their moderators. I’m not sure how that’d work if communities get really big though

Wizard,

I think at this point even tech bros hate people that try to insert the blockchain and cryptowhatever into everything.

grue,

Think less "Bitcoin" and more "Freenet." IMO the point shouldn't be to try to monetize stuff, it should be to decouple content from the instance it was posted on (i.e., to mirror popular content across instances to distribute the load) while still maintaining control and attribution for the user that posted it.

QHC,
QHC avatar

But how does blockchain, as a technology, help with that? The Fediverse already has a mechanism for distributing content across multiple instances.

xtremeownage, (edited )

At a simple level- a lot of that happens already.

Moving around between communities is quite seamless, even though most of them are hosted on different servers, and even different parts of the world.

parrot-party,
parrot-party avatar

That's not going to work for web hosting. The only reason it works for crypto or folding is because each request takes minutes to run and there's no time dependence on returning the result. Additionally, they don't need much data and all data needed is dispersed with the task.

Websites are completely different. Each individual request is tiny, taking milliseconds to process. Each request is very time dependant, you have a person literally waiting for the result. But the biggest issue is that what people really want is stuff from a database. So that database would need up grant full access to everyone, meaning anyone could change whatever they wanted. Lastly, that database would need to be hosted anyway so you've gained nothing.

Don't suggest tech solutions when you don't have any idea what the problem or solution actually involves.

limelight79,

This made me wonder - what happens if my chosen Lemmy server goes down? Do I lose my account?

Hopefully, some kind of account portability is possible or in consideration. Even if it's a manual download of settings and subscriptions that could easily be uploaded to another instance.

DM_Gold,

As of right now, yes your account would go poof. Mastodon currently has a way to migrate servers, but it hasn't been implemented in Lemmy yet. I'm sure at some point it will become available, but if you are worried about all your posts I'd make local backups for now.

limelight79,

Thanks. I'm not really worried about my comments, nothing I'm saying is that useful long term. It's more the list of subscriptions, that would be a headache to recreate.

DM_Gold,

Agreed that would be a huge pain.

Wizard,

I had to reinstall my local instance, and wasn’t able to import my old database. That meant I had to go re-subscribe to everything and even worse, nothing on my account will actually federate. Comments I make on the “main” admin account won’t federate anywhere, because the instances see that “old” user with the same name, but exchange is different.

So I had to create this second account, and use this to comment on things with. It’s a pain, but hopefully it gets better. Even if it’s just being able to export my subscriptions so I don’t have to try to find them all again.

parrot-party,
parrot-party avatar

We just need Wikipedia style funding. If the server publishes their costs and fundraises, then people can support it directly. Instead of the stick and carrot of subscriptions or the rat race of ads, just be open and honest about server needs. If the users aren't able to raise funds, then cut back to what's affordable. Users will either deal with the reduced server capacity or they'll need to pay up to continue enjoying it. This doesn't need to be a free ride, but I trust the community will rally for a good service.

furrowsofar,

The counter is that there are federation costs too. For relatively balanced nodes that should not matter. But if you are a small instance with a lot of popular communities it might be a problem. Plus you will never get a large fraction of people contributing. So those that can will need to remember to give a solid contribution.

DM_Gold,

A lot of server owners do this already. The instance I'm on for example does this and also disclosed that they would donate any "proceeds" to the development of Lemmy. So they are only paying for upkeep costs.

realitista,

Should be mandatory reading for anyone who wants this to succeed. I hope we don't make the same mistakes as doomed so many other open source open protocol projects in the past.

hyperspace,
hyperspace avatar

The solution is to simply ignore the corpos

xtremeownage,

The solution is to simply ignore the corpos

I envision- its not that simple.

They will likely offer the one thing we are missing here-

Ease of use, for normal people. Ie, your grandma using her facebook app, can interact with you via the fediverse.

That being said- most of us will know, the temporary boost to the fediverse will not be worth the long-term consequences. But- to your average user, they will love this idea.

So- only time will tell. Although, Mastodon has quite a following and has been holding steady so far.

RandoCalrandian,
RandoCalrandian avatar

It doesn't matter what they offer, whatever it is or however nice, it's a trojan horse.

It is not in our or the fediverse's interest to cede any form of control to these corporations who have a monetary interest in ensuring our failure

xtremeownage,

It doesn’t matter what they offer, whatever it is or however nice, it’s a trojan horse.

I am in agreeance with you. I KNOW what happens when they get involved.

The problem is, 90% of the users do NOT. All they care, is the app on their phone works.

infinitevalence,
@infinitevalence@discuss.online avatar

I'm not on Facebook for a reason, I will never fed with meta.

HubertManne,
HubertManne avatar

I sorta wish we could subscribe to federation endpoints the way we do to magazines. Then it won't matter what is being federated overall. Hail the user, hail thyself!

infinitevalence,
@infinitevalence@discuss.online avatar

I need to spend some time playing with KBin I like the bit I was testing but being able to share wtih Lemmy is so awesome.

QHC,
QHC avatar

Instances could do what Beehaw does and defed one direction but still allow their content to be seen by other instances. I think Meta could decide to defed and block that, if they wanted to, however. (Beehaw doesn't seem to care if other instances see their content as long as they can control posts/comments on their end, which doesn't bother me at all since it doesn't effect me in any way. And I still get more content!)

joshuarupp,

I sure hope that Meta doesn't try to integrate ActivityPub into their apps. As a user that feels like they finally found their home (Digg -> Reddit -> Lemmy/kbin), please, go away Meta. lol

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@beehaw.org
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • mdbf
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • vwfavf
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • PowerRangers
  • provamag3
  • everett
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • All magazines