Did not know location invalidated peoples democratic rights. But given how much closer and able to offer support Argentina is then the UK. They must be really crappy for 99.8% of the only people who have ever formed a civilian settlement to decide they want the UK instead.
But more to the point. Chile and all its islands are right next to Argentina. Dose that mean their population has no right to decide who rules they follow. Why is water 350 miles wide not enough of a border to allow citizens to make up there own mind. But land right next to it is ok. Denmark’s Faroe Islands is about the same distance from the UK. While Denmark is 3x the distance. Dose that mean the UK should rule thm. And fuck hat the people living there think. Hell the republic of ireland is less then 80 miles and we used to rule them.Why do they deserve freedom.
And hell if you look as the Caribbean sea and the Golf of Mexico with a 350 mile radius to any larger nation. It becomes a complete fucking mess.
The whole idea that Argentina has any claim at all based on location is just utterly insane.
Whoa there. Awfully defensive about your past imperialism, aren’t ya? What’s insane is the number of people still kowtowing to the British government because they had a big navy 200 years ago.
How the hell is supporting the democratic rights of settlers supporting imperialism. An idea that is founded in feudalism.
Besides how the hell is the Falklands Islands to do with imperialism. No one lived their at all before UK settlers. UK was the first human landing France Spain and UK ran military out posts for decades. Argentina less then 1 year. Then some UK folk built a settlement. At no point in the past has any nation taken over the homes of other nations citizens. In fact the closest we have seen is Argentina trying to force its way. A nation also built by Spanish imperialism.
Your arguments are totally unfounded bullshit with less then 0 merit.
Add comment