Chanders, to fediverse
@Chanders@sciences.social avatar

I’m leery of the idea of piling on on this platform, so let me just say that this is in regard to the vs post that a lot of you are taking about today. Here’s what I think.

The problem with this critique in particular, and the idea of BlueSky in general, is that it is evidence that even the most thoughtful (and radical) thinkers, developers and workers in digital tech have internalized the ideology of SV digital capitalism over the past two decades.

What I mean is this:

1/

Chanders,
@Chanders@sciences.social avatar

For what it is worth, this is an old old old debate in media and cultural studies, and understanding it is something that folks with a background in cultural studies and technology can contribute to this debate.

To put my cards out on the table, I’m far more on than I was 20 years ago. 🤷🏻‍♂️

But whatever else you take away from this, a technology that truly wants to change the world cannot make “user experience” or even “mass adoption” the metric by which success is judged. /end.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines