@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

MattsAlt

@MattsAlt@hexbear.net

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

It seems like some wrap up 9/11 truth conspiracies into a bundle and throw them all away based on the most absurd ones, like the planes actually being taken away to some black site with all the passengers still alive.

In reality, if you view some of the details like the entire scenario surrounding the striking of the Pentagon, the very odd timing of air defense training/drills drawing fighter jets away from the region, and all the warnings from other intelligence agencies paired with Rumsfeld and friends’ actions that day, it seems just as absurd to say those were a ton of wacky coincidences

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

You’re deliberately misreading their post

It says “why industrial animal torture industries do not” not that “industrial animal torture doesn’t upset you just as much”

Either you think pets are higher tier beings than the equally smart and full of personality animals killed for food or you don’t. It’s not that hard

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

No, the thing that is special about all of them is that they’re living creatures that can experience pain and have desires to live in their natural environments

Your example isn’t doing any favors here. It’s honestly more concerning that all that matters to you is the label you assign to a being that gives its life worth. You’re explicitly acknowledging anything could be a pet that is meaningful to someone but some just get the shit end of the stick and are killed after a lifetime of torture instead

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

I don’t know what part of the thread I’m in at this point, but I’ve said elsewhere here that I agree this is more unhinged than average carnism defense. The underlying issue I’m trying to tease out here is the imposition of a human’s will upon the life of an animal because the human wanted to do that and didn’t care about the animal enough to make a different choice

The parent to this developing struggle session was not equivocating the two, it was asking why one made carnists feel a certain way and the mass torture of animals for food doesn’t

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

If you eat meat and this kind of story upsets you, please do some careful examination of why the industrial animal torture industries do not.

The Internet is text based, assigning a tone to what is typed is purely a personal problem to put it bluntly.

They are asking why industrial animal torture is not upsetting but killing a pet dog is. Why is someone who feels upset about the suffering of a dog not also upset about the suffering of a pig, cow, or chicken? If it’s purely the label of pet, we get back to the comment you replied to

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Care to explain how calling a person of Asian ancestry Pooh Bear isn’t incredibly racist?

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Came here to post this, so I’ll do this one instead

But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.

malcolm-checks

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

To build on that, I think it’s because “we” actively challenged and continued to grow our understanding to better fit the values held as a liberal. To us, the path out of liberalism is clear if you’re willing to really hold true to values like freedom for all and a sensible form of governance.

The contractions are everywhere, and instead of doing anything to show they do sincerely believe what they say, they make excuses or expend no effort to try and make their beliefs a reality. They’d rather blame everyone to their left and right after doing their one act to effect change, voting, than challenge themselves and their institutions.

Ultimately I think having someone who pretends to care about the same things as you be such obstinate shitheads is much more bothersome than someone who doesn’t. Stolen valor or something

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

I don’t want people to stop protesting, but I also don’t necessarily want comrades arrested for this.

If it felt like there was a snowball’s chance, then I’m all for putting yourself on the line to extract concessions. Currently it feels like almost the entire US political machine is riding on the “kill a ton of people trolley” and barely registering what all the bumps are. They couldn’t care less and will not change based on what we do so catching a charge for this doesn’t seem worth the non-existent squeeze.

I understand Palestinians feel supported by protest actions and reiterate my support for those, I’m only pointing out where it might be right to draw the line.

Very open to changing my mind on this though, I want to believe we can actually have an impact and not just show solidarity

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

A lot of this makes sense, but I’m confused by this:

Palistinian rights were starting to enter the political mainstream

What leads you to say so?

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Why only critical support for EI? They’ve been great as far as I can tell

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Gotcha! They’ve been a great source for me the past few months. Iirc all the hosts have lived in Palestine for at least a few years of their lives and regularly have Palestinians on the live stream. The majority of their contributors are also Palestinians

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

he’s our little snowflake

Fantastic

Over under on this guy being a comrade, deranged lib, or Cheeto worshiper?

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Oh look, a bad take from a programming.dev poster

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

I’m conflicted, as I do believe that action for the sake of the climate is morally correct, but that these actions aren’t accomplishing much of anything at this point.

Andreas Malm has done a few talks about XR, Just Stop Oil, or Insulate Brittain vs groups like Tyre Extinguishers, Ende Gelända, or Les Soulèvements de la Terre: his conclusion is that the former groups have done some amount of good with consciousness raising but at this point those who are going to be moved or sympathetic have been ‘activated’ and further nuisance activities alone will not advance the cause further and could instead harden people against the movement because it is action that is seemingly targeting ‘regular people’ and not the ones responsible for the situation we are in. He commends the groups for targeting banks and other institutions but doesn’t believe actions like blocking roads for the sake of doing so (obstruction of access to specific targets is another story) or throwing powder on a game advance the cause.

He goes on to say that arrests should never been seen as some kind of virtuous thing and instead should be seen as failures because it is taking people out of the movement and making their further contributions more difficult and potentially dangerous for their continued freedom.

I generally defend blocking roads as an act of protest, but I also understand the idea that there needs to be further escalation targeting the actual polluters because you will never turn all of the western public to your side.

Here are a couple of the talks I’m referring to, interesting to listen to the perspectives:

Panel discussion on potential future of the movement

Individual talk about where we stand today

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

There’s certainly a reason hardcore activists in the environmentalist and animal rights movements were targeted so heavily. I’m partial to the belief that it’s something way too many people might empathize with or even worse, copy. It’s also a pipeline into real leftism and anti-capitalism that can’t be countered with muh 100 gorgiollion dead from cummunism

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

I think the DNC votes for it, not sure to be honest. not-hillary vs jokermala vs pete-eat showdown with possible special guests pritzger and newsom

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar
MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Say what you will, but that’s stupid to me.

He has the bag and then suffers consequences for apparently no gain besides saying what hogs want to hear whereas Bush also cut taxes, literally stole 2 elections, and lied the US into trillion dollar wars with no consequence and is seen as a painter now who makes Masterclasses

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Oh yeah I still think it’s a coin flip if he’s president in a year and change, don’t get me wrong, I just think Bush was able to accomplish all Trump did and much more with even less consequence

MattsAlt,
@MattsAlt@hexbear.net avatar

Agreed there, vanity is really the only reason Trump got into all this in my eyes

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • normalnudes
  • tsrsr
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Durango
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • PowerRangers
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • vwfavf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • All magazines