Rivalarrival

@Rivalarrival@lemmy.today

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Rivalarrival,

My cats do something similar. They sit on the back of an armchair next to a window, reach out across the gap, and hang onto the curtain. They’ll sit there, front paws hanging from the curtain, for hours.

I used to think they got their claws stuck, but no, as soon as I approach to “help”, they get up and disentangle themselves.

Furry little bastards. It’s their curtain now.

Rivalarrival,

Obviously.

I mean, if you had actually done any of the things for which us usaians actually use those guns, you probably wouldn’t be around to make such a comment.

Between not having guns yourself and not engaging in the behaviors for which we carry guns, when would you expect to see guns being used for their intended purposes?

Rivalarrival,

You are telling me why I have guns?

Mine must be defective. I’ve used them a lot, but never managed to hit an innocent person.

Rivalarrival,

The most effective rights movements always have and always will we fueled by those who are loud.

The Westboro Baptists were plenty loud.

Rivalarrival,

That’s true.

It’s also true that the most counterproductive forms of activism are those that are most disruptive.

Turns out that the degree of disruption does not accurately predict the effectiveness of the activism.

Rivalarrival,

That’s one possibility.

Another possibility is you haven’t the first clue as to how or why people use guns.

Rivalarrival,

There’s some truth to that. However, not all loud and disruptive activities have been successful at achieving their goals. Most are counterproductive.

I would say that militant veganism is about as productive at promoting a plant-based diet as the Westboro Baptist Church was at promoting heterosexuality.

Rivalarrival,

Is a “chicken egg” an egg laid by a chicken, or an egg that will hatch into a chicken?

Rivalarrival,

I agree, and I’ve made the same argument. It’s perfectly valid, Unless the egg belongs to the creature who laid it, instead of the creature that hatched from it.

If the egg in question is a “proto-chicken’s egg” because it was laid by a proto-chicken, then the chicken would have come before the chicken egg.

Rivalarrival,

There is no question as to the biology. The first egg that would hatch a chicken was laid by a proto-chicken. The genetic mutation that delineated chicken from proto-chicken first existed in that egg.

By your argument, the status of the egg is dependent on what it contains.

Suppose that proto-chicken pair laid an egg. And instead of it hatching into a chicken, I ate it. This egg never became a chicken; it was only an egg. It couldn’t be a chicken egg, because it never contained a chicken. It could only be a proto-chicken egg.

The egg that the chicken hatched from only became a chicken egg once there was a chicken inside it. The chicken egg, therefore, could not precede the chicken.

Rivalarrival, (edited )

In some anti-abortion states, the information in question can potentially be used as evidence in a murder trial for having sought an abortion. A prosecutor can potentially use the timing of that previous period to suggest fetal age at the time of a future abortion may be greater than the law allows.

Doctors don’t need that information. Insurance companies surely don’t need that information.

Rivalarrival, (edited )

Doctor patient confidentiality is not absolute, and even if it were, the associated records are not. They are subject to subpoena in certain circumstances.

It is unsafe to suggest that no doctor can be trusted with this type of information.

It is unsafe to suggest that they can. Safety isn’t on the menu here. You can only get it with a referendum. Or a guillotine.

Rivalarrival,

There is already an alarming lack of women’s reproductive care,

How’s the health care in prison?

Your suggestion that you should fear talking about a provider out of concern for the slim possibility that you will be prosecuted for having an abortion is outright dangerous.

Indeed, it is. As is your suggestion that the possibility of prosecution is “slim”. We have highly motivated people seriously promoting pregnancy registries. They believe such registries are necessary to prevent murder.

Now weigh that against the amount of just black women who die every year for lack of prenatal care. What you are spreading is not only dangerous, but reeks of privilege.

You’re hand waving away even the possibility of civil or criminal penalties for seeking healthcare, and I’m the one who sounds privileged?

Rivalarrival, (edited )

Again… How many people have gone to prison from this information? Because lack of prenatal care or access to reproductive care is responsible for over 1k deaths a year in the US alone.

You don’t get to make that claim. You only get to claim harm arising from a patient refusing to provide dates of last menstruation, or similar information that can be used to time a pregnancy. The idea that women shouldn’t seek care at all is your own strawman. I didn’t make any such claim whatsoever. My claim is only that people should not be testifying against themselves to medical professionals.

And we have even more people determined to protect abortion rights, and many states have constitutional protections for this exact reason

And when they are charged or sued in a state that doesn’t?

One of the major hurdles for prenatal and pediatric care among minority communities is a general distrust in medical systems. This stems from systemic racial inequalities that a lot of people within the medical system are attempting to actively change.

Those “systemic racial inequalities” you’re talking about? Those exist. “Just trust doctors” doesn’t solve them. “Just pretend there are no legal risks” doesn’t save patients from having their medical data used against them. That’s great that people in the field are actively trying to change that. But it does not change the fact that people outside the field are actively working in the opposite direction.

While we are waiting for sanity to be restored, anyone who can get pregnant and find themselves in the jurisdiction of a hostile state should consider the legal ramifications of discussing their period.

Obscure screw added so appliance cannot be disassembled (lemmy.world)

Basic blender went bad (motor ran but spindle wasn’t rotating). I wanted to disassemble to see if it could be repaired. Three of the four screws were Phillips head. I had to cut the casing open in order to discover why I couldn’t unscrew the fourth. It was a slotted spanner.

Rivalarrival,

How are you supposed to grind a flat on a screw recessed 2" in a hole?

Rivalarrival,

But we must consider the fact that when the show was airing,

Hulu rebooted it in 2020. The latest season was released in February, 2023.

Rivalarrival,

The only source that life there is terrible are defector’s testimonies, which contradict each other on a daily basis and where the worst, most emotional stories are rewarded with fame and money.

There are other sources.

For example:

https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/1602dad4-4264-4e5a-a933-4dcab518a0b4.jpeg

Rivalarrival,

That might be their real problem. I mean, everywhere else on the planet, the value of menial labor greatly exceeds the cost of the lighting a human needs to be able to work. If they are, indeed, only providing lighting during daylight hours, they are only utilizing 1/3 to 1/2 of the industrial capacity they have invested in. They bought a tractor plant, but because they won’t turn on the lights, it’s production is far short of its capacity.

For want of a lightbulb, the production was lost. For want of production, farming equipment was lost. For want of farming equipment, the harvest was lost. For want of a harvest, the people were lost.

Rivalarrival, (edited )

The DPRK has no shortage of coal. It’s one of their export products. They currently produce 35 million tons a year, and only burn 10 million.

While not commonly used in the rest of the world due to abundant oil and gas supplies, coal liquefaction and gasification are relatively simple and proven technologies. Having coal provides a (somewhat dirty) source of gas and liquid fuels, if utilized for that purpose.

Apparently, electricity is considerably more valuable in DPRK than the opportunity cost of shutting down the entire country overnight. I would think that the factories producing tractors and equipment for converting non-arable land into cropland would be a sufficiently high enough priority to justify burning some excess coal, but apparently not.

Rivalarrival,

the most humble dude in history

What does Mr. Rogers have to do with this?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • normalnudes
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • DreamBathrooms
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • everett
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines