SamuelRJankis

@SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

SamuelRJankis,

Out of the many repost of this story since Friday this is most wild claim I’ve seen. It’s on r/Canada level of ignorance.

The authors of the study by the non-partisan Fraser Institute

I’ve also never seen something with that many citation on Wikipedia.

The Fraser Institute is a libertarian-conservative Canadian public policy think tank and registered charity.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Tenants don’t have to foot unpaid tax bills for foreign landlords: minister - National | Globalnews.ca (globalnews.ca)

“I want to reassure Canadians that the Canada Revenue Agency does not intend to collect any portion of any non-resident landlords’ unpaid taxes from individual tenants,” read a statement released by Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau on X, formerly known as Twitter, Friday afternoon....

SamuelRJankis,

To be clear it’s on track to be worse than the worst period led by a Conservatives without a pandemic.

SamuelRJankis,

The broad association with GDP per person is fine as a aggregate measure and the data is from Statcan.

Their interpretation of the data is clearly bias. I think anyone bothering to even skim the actual report data would come to a different conclusion.

lemmy.world/…/5be97d4a-0894-4fa8-b99c-7d1bdcaeb03…

SamuelRJankis,

The report that is not linked in the article, to be clear the entire thing is just based off of GDP:

fraserinstitute.org/…/changes-in-per-person-GDP-I…


Probably the most interesting chart out of the entire thing: https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5be97d4a-0894-4fa8-b99c-7d1bdcaeb03b.png

I feel this paints Mulroney(1984-1993) way worse than Trudeau. https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8cc80c89-4d79-4189-9630-5b3712234104.png

SamuelRJankis,

The chart also doesn’t look to hot for the guy running things in 2008 and part of 2015. Whomever that may be…

SamuelRJankis,

It’s even more amazing that people will toss a lit cigarette butt in the middle of droughts.

Like I almost get why someone is so lazy they don’t care if things look or smell bad but casual arson is a hell of a leap.

SamuelRJankis,

The title of the article seems to insinuate some type of charity on the landlord’s part but it seems like it’s very clearly just business a transaction.

He said he was approached by several housing agencies asking if he would be willing to rent units to their clients and because of the promise of guaranteed rent and access to the city’s landlord damage fund, he agreed.

“When the agencies came to me and said the rents are guaranteed, that was a big selling point,” Dagenais said.

SamuelRJankis,

That would require a level of political leadership not seen in many decades. Would also help if people voted better.

SamuelRJankis,

That because they aren’t primarily meant for people who buy them to live in, they’re just suppose to be flipped after a few years by investors or rented out.

Half of BC’s New Condos Apartments Are Investor Owned

SamuelRJankis,

I thought that person was just the run of the mill social media idiot until I saw her name on an anti abortion list.

Crazy politics has gotten so bad in Canada people will vote to pay this person 210k a year.

SamuelRJankis,

This is the source of the data for the title of the article, it should answer a lot of the speculative comments in this post.

Table 14-10-0063-01 Employee wages by industry, monthly, unadjusted for seasonality

Also people are significantly associating hourly wage with total annual income much more than it needs to be.

Will Poilievre flip a 'kill switch' on Canada's Constitution? | About That (youtu.be)

I got an email from Leadnow recently and they used this phrase about Poilievre “flipping a kill switch” on the constitution. I usually trust their emails, but this is one of those instances where I wanted to double check this one. I copy pasted the phrase into a search engine and came across this video....

SamuelRJankis,
  • He probably will invoke the notwithstanding clause.
  • It’ll be worded in such a ambiguous way people won’t even be sure what it even does.

For anyone wondering this is the specific section he seems to be targeting. Although some of the stuff he says seems to cover how parts.

  1. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
SamuelRJankis,

I wish people just come out and say what they want instead making these long ass allegorical speeches. The guy wants subsidies.

Lütke compared the increase in capital gains taxes to levies on cigarettes to illustrate how governments typically put a higher price on activities that it wants to discourage. “To tax innovation, you’ll see the same thing,” he warned.

SamuelRJankis,

Can anyone confirm if the Transgender Sports bill is the only thing the BC Conservatives introduced in a fairly long time?

Like that’s John Rustad only actual “contribution” as a MLA besides talking.

SamuelRJankis,

Just going to point out the source website is pretty questionable. Also a quick google search doesn’t seem to yield much results.

SamuelRJankis,

As someone who looks at a lot of data and charts I don’t remember seeing any charts where Canada isn’t gotten noticeably worse compared other G7 countries.

I actually find it hard to believe people don’t think Trudeau’s leadership has been a very significant problem for this country. It’s just laughable that anyone thinks Pierre is better.

SamuelRJankis,

I’m probably voting for NDP whenever they decide to call a election. I don’t think Jagmeet is going to be a good PM but if he can deliver voting reform that’s a lot more than I’d expect from anyone else.

SamuelRJankis,

Given that the Liberals had majority at that point I think that instance is on them.

SamuelRJankis,

They didn’t have a majority on the ER committee. So should they have unilaterally ignored the majority report of the other parties and just ram through their own preference for STV?

They had majority in the House. They chose how the committee was constructed.

I’m really amazed how the people with 44 seats is suppose more responsible for something than the people that had 184 seats.

en.wikipedia.org/…/Canadian_House_of_Commons_Spec…

The initial proposed structure of the Special Committee was three voting members allocated based on each official party’s seats in the House (six Liberal members, three Conservative members, and one New Democratic member), with a member of the Bloc Québécois and Green Party leader Elizabeth May given additional non-voting seats.[6]

The structure of the Special Committee was criticized by the opposition party leaders, as the government would have possessed a majority of the committee seats and could unilaterally recommend alterations to the electoral system without the support of any other party. Interim Conservative leader Rona Ambrose, the Leader of the Official Opposition, denounced the plan as “stacking the deck”, while Nathan Cullen, the NDP critic for Democratic Institutions, urged the government to reconsider this plan as well. The Green Party and Bloc Québécois additionally objected to their lack of voting representation on the committee.[7]

On June 2, 2016, Monsef announced that the government would support a motion by Cullen to alter the structure of the committee to have seats allocated based on percentage of the nationwide popular vote in the 2015 election and give the Bloc Québécois and Greens one voting seat each on the committee.[8][9] The Liberal caucus on the committee would have in effect only four voting members, as the chair would not vote unless there was a tie.[10]

Further references.

2015 Election results: en.wikipedia.org/…/2015_Canadian_federal_election

Timeline: globalnews.ca/…/justin-trudeau-liberals-electoral…

SamuelRJankis,

While I agree with the sentiment I don’t think being a public service should exclude them from being scrutinized.

The corporation cites declining revenue from delivery of letter mail and parcels, despite an increase in the volume of packages the company is delivering.

Letter mail has been declining since it peaked in 2006. Canada Post delivered less than 2.2 billion letters in 2023.

The cost of delivering mail and parcels is increasing, the company said. Canada Post has struggled to compete post-pandemic with the rising number of new, privately owned delivery companies that use what it calls a “low-cost labour” business model.

I think it was more controversial in 2014, but at a near 2 decade decline of letter mail volume thinking about reducing door to door letter services with community mailboxes seems pretty reasonable thing to at least discuss.

As far as competing with companies that are known for creating a job environment where their “contractors” have to piss in bottles. I don’t think is a Canada Post issue.

SamuelRJankis,

I’d put some good money down that this statement isn’t true if anyone taking bets for it.

CNL said it’s “confident that the non-compliant discharge from the sewage treatment facility does not pose a threat to the environment or the public.”

SamuelRJankis,

Just a random thing. Isn’t it crazy Loblaws doesn’t accept Amex.

T&T even accepts Alipay and WeChat pay.

SamuelRJankis,

Just skipping the conversation whether he’s better than the current Prime Minister I think everyone should be able to agree the Pierre is a idiot.

bc.ctvnews.ca/pierre-poilievre-weighs-in-on-bc-nd…

“Even nurses are having to give up on breastfeeding because they’re worried their kids will be contaminated with drugs they breathe in. What the hell they thinking over there?” said Poilievre.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines