UserDoesNotExist

@UserDoesNotExist@sh.itjust.works

Leave me alone. And for gods sake, don’t ban me!

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

UserDoesNotExist,

It shouldn’t. It’s alright to be unhappy with someone’s opinion, but to collectively start to hate and express this hate towards a single person, that is highly questionable.

It’s simply embarrassing low-level behaviour. One should not lower themselves to the level of the one they critique.

But here we are, tons of morons chanting “fuck spez”, “fuck spez”,… Yea that will show him… Especially that everyone returned to r/place to have “fun” with the bots.

What a joke.

UserDoesNotExist,

Politics has become an utter clown show. No matter who is in power, it always ends up to be some weirdo.

Is it rly a surprise that people lean further left and further right, into the extreme political right and the extreme political left?

Where else should people go, when what used to be the compromise of reason has become the embodiment of failure?

UserDoesNotExist,

Well. In some twisted way it is polarising and broken.

Trans right activists have pushed far too strong and too far. Probably as well in a reactionary sense to an extremist right position.

Trans right debates have gone so far to ignore biology in a sense. Forcing an idea that there are multiple genders. An idea everyone should be entitled to have, but no one should be forced to believe so.

There are trans people activists calling for the death of all men, again in a reactionary sense against positions of the far right, whom themselves have been polarised further.

It doesn’t matter who started. But the spiral doesn’t seem to end anytime soon.

UserDoesNotExist,

Can’t find the source. Just some feminists asking for all men to die.

But there was some video of some parade where a choir started to shout something along “death to all men”.

Now just think about how this radicalises the people that hear that. Then they radicalise themselves and become the reason for counterradicalisation.

And so Society swings itself to new heights of confrontation

UserDoesNotExist,

Trans right activists have pushed far too strong and too far. Probably as well in a reactionary sense to an extremist right position.

What does this even mean? Why is there a speed limit on giving people equal rights?

Regardless of the current topic, every social and cultural development needs a speed limit. Radical change leads to radical currents. Because unchecked socio-cultural development depends on people. It does not involve people, but issues a dictate. And whether this dictate is progressive and positive is a moot point. But oppressive constraints lead to counter-movements.

What did trans people do to make republicans kick them out of bathrooms and legislate away pronouns?

First of all, trans people were assigned a gender at birth.

And what is written on a document, that’s what’s valid. Accordingly, Republicans are not kicking trans people out of bathrooms, they are maintaining the status quo and enforcing an enforcement of the current norms.

Your point is more that Republicans are standing in the way of trans people making a change in their documents that legally assures them the use of the bathroom they want.

I’m not going to bother continuing to respond to your other points. You’re clearly a bigot/transphobic. You think they deserve this.

This is unfortunate. I would have liked to further discuss this.

UserDoesNotExist,

“GEN-DORR” somewhat sounds like some perfume brand.

UserDoesNotExist,

It’s not really hard to understand. Gender and sex are different things.

And still people claim that there is the male gender and the female gender. So there clearly is a connection, is there not?

Trans rights debates aren’t ignoring biology, because gender has nothing to do with biology (that would be sex).

I had many interesting discussions about gender. And I really was open to all kinds of opinions. And I believe that I still am. But so far no one could clearly tell me what gender is. Is it a social construct? Is it connected to sex? If not, why are there two genders called male and female? Wait there are more than 2 genders? How many are there? 50, 60? Oh no, gender is a spectrum. A spectrum of what? Of what people feel like? Feel like happy, sad? NOPE, It’s sexual - but in a thought concept only! What use does that have? If it’s a spectrum, then I cannot grasp it, it’s vague and it cannot be communicated. Everything so far speaks against the existence of gender. Because even the origin of gender studies are about the social dynamics between the male sex and female sex.

In simpler terms, sex is determined by biology - genetics, genitals you were born with, etc., and gender is determined by what an individual perceives themselves to be.

“determined by what an individual perceives themselves to be.” And here we get into the absolutely ridiculous part of the gender idea. Some delusional people believe themselves to be medical experts. Does that make them a doctor? Or does their gender become “doctor”?

Gender ideology is a piece of clay that dried out while it was still formed.

UserDoesNotExist,

Well. Kill all men is still a rather popular hashtag on Twitter. Also found this article about something similar. (Why it’s not ok to say “kill all men”) But unfortunately I cannot find the video that I was referring to.

UserDoesNotExist,

I am from Germany. Everything of substance must (and can) be defined and described clearly. I am thinking hard about it, because it needs to make sense to have an actual value to me. And I have been trying. But I fail and have yet to see someone succeed.

If a replicable description/definition of an idea or concept does not exist, then this concept or this idea is flawed and needs correction/rethinking. Or, if with substantial efforts, no clear definition can be made out, then the concept/the idea needs to be discarded and we move along to the next idea/concept we might see take shape.

UserDoesNotExist, (edited )

Yes I understood by now that gender is mental. But now tell me, how it does differentiate from a delusion.

If gender is a mental association with a sexual construct, then it is purely imaginary. And what value does it have then?

In everyone’s brain is the structure of a human consciousness. And this consciousness is a survival and problem solving apparatus. It does not need to identify with anything. It just needs to control the conscious bodily functions.

The human consciousness is independent from gender. We would usually arrange just fine if we would have been born in a body of a different sex. Because we adapt.

I would do just fine in a female body. I wouldn’t care much. I don’t identify with my sex because I do not identify with some twisted sexual construct. I am a human consciousness in a flesh suit. And as long as I can do my daily tasks with that flesh suit, then life is alright. At least as good as it possibly can be.

Why would I even see a problem in my sex or gender or whatever if I have problems that annoy me so much more? Occasionally my knees hurt, because I was running way too much in the past. I got a bit chubby then, which annoys me greatly, my eyesight has decreased immensely since I started studying in university, because of all this time I spend in front of books and screens. And I am especially frustrated that I am not as bright as I would like to be. I want to know everything, I want to know how this universe works, into the smallest detail, and yet I am struggling due to laziness. My biggest enemy and challenge in life. Gender is a luxury problem. And a worldwide view proves me right.

The belief to be born in the wrong body is delusion. That doesn’t mean that I do not accept if people want plastic surgery. You do you. I owe you your right to believe I to your delusion. Can’t do much anyway. Some people believe into the bible.

But I refuse to accept a delusion as reality. And I do not want to be forced to pretend to believe into your delusion.

UserDoesNotExist,

Why is it that cats are so interested in paper boxes (or small rooms they can squeeze in) at all?

UserDoesNotExist,

I don’t care. I am on Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, Lemmy, and probably a shit ton more. And I jump wherever I want. It doesn’t matter who is in control. Just the fun I have with a platform. The value it has for my life.

And Twitter is now even more fun than before. It’s so toxic, so much discussions, I love it.

It has never been docile, but boy, shits finally let loose. It’s like Reddit in the good old days.

UserDoesNotExist,

It’s just funny arrows pointing upwards or downwards. It’s not that important. No one needs to like my opinion.

But there is nothing worse than a dead post without any comments. So I thought I’d start something here.

In retro perspective I didn’t need to. People started all by themselves.

UserDoesNotExist,

In the end we are all miserable. Left or right doesn’t matter. Unhappiness is normality. It is the driver for improvement and discussions.

UserDoesNotExist,

Nope. Just some dude who has found his own form of entertainment.

I’d rather have fun with something than getting angry about trivia.

What use does it have to you to get angry about a platform you do not seem to be involved with anymore?

Call me edgy and immature all you want. I am happy.

UserDoesNotExist,

Oh no. You misunderstood me. I am extremely bored with my studies. Hours in front of books is tiring. Most people around me are boring as well. Not the brightest unfortunately.

On twitter I am just reposting the most radical left stuff or radical right stuff I can find from different accounts. While I am not as big as hedge funds, I do like to compare myself to them. I consider myself a social hedge fund. I do my part in accelerating the development of political ideologies by leading people into believing there needs to be a more extreme opposition on each side.

And people online are so naive. I already got you on the hook, don’t I? Nah, I am just kidding. I am just a peaceful observer on twitter and other social media. :)

UserDoesNotExist,

But hear me out … what if you could fade out all the opinions you don’t like. Ultimate echo chamber building in reality.

Some politicians will rly like this ⊂(◉‿◉)つ Literally all politicians would love that.

UserDoesNotExist,

Damn. Now I remember. You are right.

UserDoesNotExist,

( ͡° ʖ̯ ͡°) I am tired of discussing.

But you are wrong. Trust me bro.

UserDoesNotExist,

Amateur. With the power of the Seifensäckchen, I manage to shower within 2-3 minutes.

UserDoesNotExist,

What for do you need representation? I don’t need it. I don’t even know what should or could represent me.

I don’t identify with anything. I am just my self as I am. What use would it have to identify with something? None.

It’s purely corporations trying to make capital gains off cultural phenomena (useless currents that will fizzle out just to get replaced with the next trend - LGB was followed by LGBT and was followed by LGBTQIA+++, it’s the endless progression of a subculture, something big corporation can milk like Star Wars or any other brandable shit), it’s like some Christian dumbass buying a beer because some tortured guy is printed on it.

It has become so laughable nowadays, that Id imagine only some “woke” boomers would fall for it. But nope. Tons of stupid people from all age groups are celebrating their own belief of being rebellious and innovative, or shall I say the belief to improve the world. And big corporations love it. They love the drama and the attention they can generate with the trend hunters.

UserDoesNotExist,

•`_´•

UserDoesNotExist,

10

UserDoesNotExist,

Because humans always or against each other towards inequalities and hierarchies.

I don’t subscribe to this cynical view of humankind.

While you don’t have to do so, I believe there is no better way than to see the harsh truth of our existence. And it is not ideal and will never be.

Sure we can and have to strive for betterment. But ignoring human nature is and has always been a mistake. In smaller groups communism happens to work. But attempts at larger groups always fail. It is not possible for us to think bigger than our familiar groups. And people that believe to be different are simply wrong, because they themselves thereby become the opposing group that believes to have a missionary duty in some twisted belief of righteousness. Combatting human nature is so hard in fact, that letting it run loose is far simpler. The little attempts or let us call them correction measures we call rules are already hard to maintain.

It is systems like capitalism that introduce these inequalities and hierarchies. In a system based on “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need,” there would be no need to establish inequities and hierarchies. In fact, in such a system, it would run against one’s own best interests to invest in such destructive paths.

Doesn’t work. Can only be maintained in optessive dictatorships. UDSSR and China.

You cannot escape human nature

  1. It is human nature to exist in a social group that upholds the interest of self as well as those around us.

Only applies to this extend onto smaller groups. Groups sizes of large families. Clan structures and such kind. The bigger the group, the smaller the interest in others existence. And again this is rooted in human nature and human evolution.

Are you projecting your own shortcomings onto the rest of us?

No.

  1. Even if your cynical viewpoint were correct, this is still false. We are beings of higher intelligence, not bound by the confines of instinct.

We are social animals. And you are right, due to our intellect we are capable to break free from our instincts and we are capable to distance ourselves from our irrational social evolutionary traits. We are capable to rationalise it. Analyse our own behaviour patterns and make theories why that is. But Intellect does not free us from our evolutionary given brain functions and structures. One example is war. We are unable to evade violence. In some situations we just lean into it. And this has been for over 4000 years. 4000 years and human behaviour didn’t change by much. Just new tech.

We have language that we can use to develop new systems and new understandings that aren’t inherently destructive like capitalism.

Every social form is inherently destructive in some way. There are no exceptions. Human nature is flawed and this will always be represented in the systems we create for order and structure.

Capitalism at least offers the slight chance to better your own position

LMAO what? Capitalism does the very opposite. You are victim of the “temporarily embarrassed millionaire” mindset of capitalism. It’s false propaganda. You’ve been deceived.

I am not deceived in any way. I can only remind you of what socialism does. In the DDR they assigned young people jobs already in school. Deciding who will be allowed to study at university and who will not. Capitalism gives you the choice. It does not need oppression and dictatorship to work.

(Or maybe you are benefiting from this system and therefore want people to believe this, which … says something not so good about your character.)

I do indeed profit from the system because I was given the option to decide what to do with my life. And I decided to study at University.

If you are born smart

If you’re born smart, you do have privileges and opportunities that others do not have. This itself is an inequity that we should work to correct, and not something to be proud of.

Being smart is something one should not be proud of? What about beauty? And what do you mean with correction an inequity? Drugs to lower peoples mental capacity down to the average? Or even lower? Your argument seems weird to me, I do t think I understood it correctly. You should rephrase it.

or very dedicated

And there it is! The good ol’ bootstraps came out. It was only a matter of time.

Dedication and hard work is no guarantor for success. It or defensively helps. After my studies I always spend extra time to understand capital investment, because I am trying to learn as much as possible. I am for sure spending 10-12 hours a day learning and another 1-1,5 to build my knowledge about finances. Because I believe that with this extra time invested, I will be more capable to profit from my future salary with wise financial decisions. Capitalism has given us the internet. And the internet is full of knowledge. And especially the internet has enabled me to invest time into other things that interest me.

UserDoesNotExist,

None of the good things you mentioned are the result of capitalism and are in fact strangled by capitalism.

Capitalism has been a main driver of innovation and applied sciences. Under Capitalism it was possible to enhance our lives in an unbelievable short timespan. Capitalism is just less restrictive. Socialism is always in need to control the economy and does not allow for quick adaptations. It’s one of the main reasons why soviets were so good at building rockets, but medical care or material sciences were simply less successful.

The internet started as a military project, which is not inherently capitalist, and if anything the internet as we know it is an example of the potential of anarchism.

I don’t understand your point. Just because the internet started as a military project and the military is not inherently capitalistic, doesn’t mean that any other social form would have been any more successful. Furthermore the internet was and is undergoing enormous change. Mainly driven by capitalism. Capitalism has sped up the development. Something no government founding could have archived to a similar extend.

Same with much of our infrastructure, such as international railways/highways, public libraries, state and national parks…

Railways and highways are build by private companies though. And indeed. With the internet we saw the downfall of public libraries, now only government founded institutions of that kind can still survive. A government is indeed needed as a correction tool, anarchistic capitalism doesn’t work. But that’s not what we got.

You also grossly overestimate how much your choices and hard work contribute to success while underestimating sheer luck and privilege.

No I do not underestimate it. I know that I am privileged to be born in a successful capitalistic country with many options in my life. And yes. Sheer luck doesn’t hurt. Why would you punish anyone for their luck or for their intellect. This is this equality vs equity argument.

I … can’t really respond to everything you wrote, partially because it’s a borderline gish gallop, but most of your statements have been addressed by leftist and post-leftist literature.

And most of leftist and post leftist literature has been addressed by capitalistic economists literature. And those have again by addressed by leftists and then they have been addressed by libertarians again and so on and so forth. It’s a debate that he not yet been settled. So making out Someone to be right and someone to be wrong is not yet and will probably not be possible at all.

I’d recommend reading up on anarcho-communism and anarcho-primitivism. They’re quite different theories that work to solve the unjust and destructive system of capitalism.

And they allow a gap in power to be filled by some dictator. Humans need power structures. Hasn’t history told us yet?

Also read up on the history of leftist movements in Latin America and how US intervention was used to derail them (US is responsible for the rise of authoritarianism/Soviet alignment in Cuba and the derailment of Sandinistas in Nicaragua, just as two examples.)

Well maybe communism in Latin America was simply not a solid system of it couldn’t handle foreign attempts of manipulation with bribes?

While not specifically leftist, I’d also recommend reading something like Caste by Isabel Wilkerson to understand racial hierarchies and Everyday Sexism by Lara Bates about gender hierarchies.

No thanks. After reading about gender theories I got extrem so annoyed by such irrational theories. I’d rather read something about anarcho-communism.

Frankly, capitalism is killing our people and destroying the planet, and it urgently needs to be stopped. It’s an inherently destructive system, and it can’t be fixed. It must be replaced.

But so is every other system. Monarchies, Capitalism, Dictatorships, Communism, Feudalism,… It’s not the system that is inherently destructive. It’s people. It is easy to blame a system. That’s for sure. But the truth lies in our nature itself.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • megavids
  • modclub
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • cubers
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •