@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

admin

@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Counterpoint: we don’t get much articles about human drivers crashing, because we’re so used to it. That doesn’t make it a good metric to consider their safety.

Edit: Having said that, this wasn’t even an article. Just an unsourced headline with a photo. One should strongly consider the possibility of a selection bias at work here.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

And then they started putting ads for subscriptions in the os.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Without datamining and that works out of the box? Please let us know when you find out.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

www.nvidia.com/Download/…/en-us/ here’s the release notes, it includes the list of supported products.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

As someone who uses Linux as a daily driver for both work and home, I have this very easy trick on making Linux more popular:

I don’t.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I checked the report, but it seems at no point it seems to clarify what they consider “bot traffic”. Is it measured in api calls, page views, or bytes? Generally the term traffic is meant as raw data transported, but in that context those numbers make no sense.

For example, one of the biggest traffic consumers in the Internet is video streaming. There’s no way in hell that half, or even a tenth, of that data is fake - it would simply cost too much to waste it on bots. Both for the bot owners as well as the streaming providers.

This level of vagueness and lack of transparency (what do the numbers mean, and where do they come from) does not fill me with confidence on this report.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar
  • “AI means there will be fewer people required to do the same amount of work”
  • “this does not mean higher unemployment”

I think you left out a steep off reasoning there. At least, I don’t follow.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

But the amount of workers will only stay the same if demand grows at the same rate as the production output.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Only in the last case there is a chance that the amount of jobs will remain the same, the other cases will lead to lost jobs.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Because lawsuits are expensive, even when you’re not guilty.

I don’t think they’d be stupid enough to lie about hiring a voice actress for a voice model when they didn’t.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Take it away, Betteridge.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Wow, time goes that fast where you live? I’m posting this 15 minutes after you, so that’s like 2 weeks for you.

Got any stock tips?

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I’m not a lawyer. But isn’t the reason they had to go to reddit to get permission is because users hand over over ownership to reddit the moment you post. And since there’s no such clause on Lemmy, they’d have to ask the actual authors of the comments for permission instead?

Mind you, I understand there’s no technical limitation that prevents bots from harvesting the data, I’m talking about the legality. After all, public does not equate public domain.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Not through the API.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Thanks for that clarification. I was afraid it would be that murky.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I found an article about it that has some details, you might find it interesting.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

TLDR: “AI” is not always right, and does not fulfil all dreams you may have of it.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

As if their user base has that kind of attention span /s.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

I think creating a lora for your character would help in that case. Not really easy to do as of yet, but technically possible, so it’s mostly a ux problem.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Nah, there’s tons of features that slack has over irc. To start with inline media (images, audio, video), but most importantly lots of out of the box external integrations and webhooks.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Customers own their own Customer Data.

Okay, that’s good.

Immediately after that:

Slack […] will never identify any of our customers or individuals as the source of any of these improvements to any third party, other than to Slack’s affiliates or sub-processors.

You’d hope the owner would get a say in that.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Just doing a public service reminder.

Are you? Or did you just think the weird “digital” in the title justifies it being posted here.

admin, (edited )
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

The only thing this has to do with technology is that a fraction of the things in the article are said online.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

Agreed. Would have worked better if it said “tangled up”. This is too much of a stretch.

admin,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

They don’t think that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •