argv_minus_one

@argv_minus_one@beehaw.org

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

argv_minus_one,

People being contractually obligated to undergo medically unnecessary surgery is still an intolerable atrocity.

argv_minus_one,

I think the problem there is that, for many years, nobody bothered to explain to him exactly why child porn is bad.

Most people observe that everyone else thinks it’s bad and don’t question it any further. That’s not good enough for Stallman, though, and for good reason: expecting him to unquestioningly bow to peer pressure is an insult to his intelligence.

Someone did eventually explain the problem to Stallman. I don’t know what exactly was explained, but my guess is that Stallman was told that child porn is non-consensual and therefore violates the child’s privacy, similar to how revenge porn violates the subject’s privacy. At any rate, after that discussion took place, Stallman did an about-face on the subject, and is now opposed to child porn like anyone else.

Moral of the story: taboos and peer pressure bad; logic and education good.

argv_minus_one,

We kinda do need him, though. Very few people are as intensely principled as he is on the subject of computing freedom, and without him anchoring the Overton window, there’s nothing stopping the Bill Gateses of this world from moving it.

argv_minus_one,

Programs to keep women barely alive so they can make more babies, maybe. But help them? Hell no; that’s now straight-up illegal in half of the USA.

argv_minus_one,

Normalizing intergenerational family homes would make abusive parents impossible to escape from, and goodness knows there are a lot of abusive parents in both countries.

argv_minus_one,

Collectivism can be good, but beware of the toxic fake collectivism practiced in China, where “sacrifice yourself for the greater good” is just code for “sacrifice yourself for the rich”.

argv_minus_one,

You have the opportunity to do that because intergenerational family homes are not normalized. If they were, you would not be paid enough to afford a home of your own. You would be financially forced to live with your parents.

argv_minus_one,

Because employers pay employees as little as possible. If you don’t have to pay rent, your employer doesn’t have to pay you enough to afford rent.

argv_minus_one,

What’s the difference?

argv_minus_one,

The wireless kind, presumably. Those always need their own firmware and therefore their own driver.

argv_minus_one,

And back at that time if you installed any flavor of Linux you were lucky if the OS install didn’t fuck itself over

I was using Linux religiously back then, and this is false. As long as there’s a driver for all of your hardware, it generally worked fine.

But that “as long as” is doing some heavy lifting. The usual suspects were pretty much the same as now: Broadcom, NeoMagic, and NVIDIA. Some cheap printers and modems were problematic as well, but if you paid for good hardware, it would probably work.

argv_minus_one,

Printers these days tend to be driverless, so that’s pretty much a solved problem.

argv_minus_one,

Printers should probably be connected by USB for security reasons anyway.

argv_minus_one, (edited )

Could’ve fooled me. I was under the impression we were sending weapons and trainers to one of our allies who are fighting them. Sounds like an enemy to me.

argv_minus_one,

Hoping to see news that the US government has finally decided to stop the economy from melting down.

I keep being disappointed…

argv_minus_one,

To be replaced by Nazis. A sad and embarrassing choice by the people of Finland.

argv_minus_one,

They do conserve one thing: the status of the wealthy.

argv_minus_one,

I’m an adult with a job, and I don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of affording the recommended system requirements for this game any time soon. RX6800XTs do not grow on trees.

argv_minus_one,

That would require you to disclose proof of your real-life identity to some dubious company for the purpose of unlocking porn. Definitely not privacy-preserving.

argv_minus_one,

You severely underestimate kids’ technical know-how. If it can be broken, they will break it.

argv_minus_one,

some conservatives are going to have things blocked that aren’t porn and are helpful to some kid’s sexual education because they’re regressive.

That sounds like the real motivation for this nonsense: not to protect kids from harm, but to protect their parents from the responsibility of properly educating them.

argv_minus_one,

Before Internet video porn, kids were finding their dads’ Playboys and VHS tapes.

And before that, people living in cabins or caves had sex in full view of their children because there was nowhere else to do it.

Children seeing adults bang is not even remotely new, and nothing overly bad ever came of it. The only reason anyone is concerned with this is because their screwed-up religion taught them to be afraid of sex, and that is not an adequate justification for compromising innocent adults’ privacy.

argv_minus_one,

But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

That is precisely the problem. It will mostly or only be used for porn.

argv_minus_one,

That will keep children out for about 12 seconds.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • kavyap
  • vwfavf
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • anitta
  • magazineikmin
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • All magazines