Replies

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

18+ root, to random
@root@possum.city avatar

Emma from the hetzner drama is now emailing me to complain about users who aren't active and have 0 posts

18+ ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@root those rascals, always the first to start .. to uh.. to.. do nothing? Keeps the mods awake I'm sure.

@.o

ezlin, to random
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

So, Elite: Dangerous is selling ships for real money now but in a twist they're kind of doing it worse than Star Citizen. Not in regards to the price tag - yet, anyway, but there are about 3 more ships not yet revealed - but in that the ship sells with at least some engineering completed.

If you've ever played E:D then you how straight-up pay to win engineering is vs non-engineered ships.

This is also on their brand new PvP focused ship, which just makes it all the more silly.

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

If there's a silver lining it's that you can grind out their item mall currency via game play, with some caps to how quickly it's earned in-game. I can't be bothered to look it up but, in theory, players will eventually be able to buy the ship via grinding. How long (or not) that'll take I don't know.

and if Elite is anything, it's a grind. So yeah, that's on brand I suppose.

OTOH, FDev, rather unsurprisingly IMO, is breaking a promise after saying they'd never do this with their item mall.

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

The funny thing about being P2W is that in Star Citizen you can spend disgusting amounts of money on ships but the bigger the ship, the more necessary the crew. Engineering (actual engineering, not ED's button click RNG) now exists in Arena Commander & is proven to necessitate a crew.

Where as in ED you can buy a big ship and multicrew is a side thought. The ships are intended to fly solo.

Spend the big money in SC & you need a crew to handle encounters. Get a big ship in ED, you fly it solo.

Tutanota, to google
@Tutanota@mastodon.social avatar

Thanks to the , can not get away with their anti-competitive behavior! 💪

Read the full story on Google taking away 90% of Tuta's visibility:
➡️ https://tuta.com/blog/google-search-problem

And what Google has to say to this on
➡️https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-rival-tuta-complains-eu-tech-regulators-about-de-ranking-2024-04-24/

18+ ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@Tutanota

> " can lose Google ranking due to algorithm changes"

> "The email provider in question is easily accessible globally on Search"

Technically correct. Tuta can be easily found via search - if you search for Tuta.

It /is/ most likely driven by the algorithm - it's just that Google is in complete control of the algorithm and obviously changed it.

They're snakes, and quite frankly, in my opinion google needs to be broken up into individual smaller companies.

The_Tim, to random
@The_Tim@mastodon.social avatar
ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar
ezlin, to StarCitizen
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

It ain't much, but it's honest work.

Players are raking in millions from a single salvaging job and here I am making my first million from mining after about a week.

This is a final profit of about 300K, which ain't great, but this is using rented vehicles. Those vehicles cost me a total of 170,952 aUEC.

The rented miner can't have its equipment upgraded so it's quite inefficient. It can't mine the best rocks.

To buy the Hull A I'll need another 290,853 aUEC. So, another week.

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

I can't help but wonder if they're going to wipe aUEC and / or ships. The reason for pondering this situation is simple.

First, people are making several million credits in one salvaging job. That's insane.

Second, they're adjusting the economy. Ships and guns are both having their prices changed significantly.

They can't test the impact of those new prices when everyone has over 10 million aUEC.

And if you have ships, then you don't need to buy them.

So I do wonder if I'll keep this ship.😆

root, to random
@root@possum.city avatar

hot take: we don't need 4k monitors

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@root

Kind of agree, kind of disagree. 3+ monitors are better than a single large monitor. You could, for example, run 3 monitors at 4K and that would be a better experience than multiple 720p displays.

But if you're choosing between a single 4K display or multiple 720p displays, well, I'd say go for 1440p displays rather than 720p, but other than that I'd agree.

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@root

Valid. I also can't afford multiple 4K displays.

In that case, multiple smaller monitors is definitely better. :blobcatgiggle:

Plus_Ultra, to random Spanish
@Plus_Ultra@starcitizen.name avatar

Space Fashion is coming.

"Wearing your undersuit" Tired

"Wearing a jacket over the undersuit" wired.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkhCr8HfrRo

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@Plus_Ultra

Yoooo that's so good! :blobcatshocked:

ezlin, to StarCitizen
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

In land I was able to mine enough material to get a single work order going. It's still buggy ala last night's post, but at least some of the rocks worked today.

Had I known that it was so flaky this patch I never would have rented this Prospector. :nkoFacepalm:

But it is what it is. I'll see if I can get a few refinery jobs going and at least make back the aUEC spent on renting this ship.

...then I'll need a cargo ship, but one step at a time. :blobcatshrug:

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@bloodaxe

What's wrong with the Hull A? I've considered picking it up. :ablobfoxhyperthinking:

ezlin,
@ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

@bloodaxe

Oh no, with the Hull C out I was hoping that this behavior was working fine now. 😅

Well crud. As much as I want the Hull A maybe I'll aim for the Freelancer (base). It's not terribly more expensive (until the aUEC price hikes in 3.23). It's old, but they're polishing it a bit (internals, doors) for 3.23..

AAKL, to ai
@AAKL@noc.social avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • ezlin,
    @ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

    @AAKL @engadget

    Typical. "Rules for thee but not for me". I know that people dislike regulation, but this is why regulation (and existing laws) need to exist and to be enforced.

    ezlin,
    @ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

    @AAKL @engadget

    Oof of course they are :nkoFacepalm:

    Meanwhile I remember grandmas being sued for tens of thousands of dollars because someone somewhere downloaded a song.

    ezlin,
    @ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

    @AAKL @engadget

    This. Laws that aren't enforced aren't laws, they're philosophy.

    ezlin,
    @ezlin@gamepad.club avatar

    @BeAware @AAKL @engadget

    I shouldn't laugh, but I did anyway. heh.

    Damn it man I used to be such a huge Metallica fan. ⚡

    Well that's ancient news I suppose.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • modclub
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • Leos
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines