karlhungus

@karlhungus@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

karlhungus,

In most cases yes. However in the cases of fines poor people are more penalized than wealthy, so there should be some proportional consideration there.

karlhungus,

this is normal enshittification, we just move on to the next shit.

karlhungus,

I’m very lazy so I’d probably start by looking at filters on those sites, if i really wanted to tackle this with programming, i’d:

see if there’s an api, or rss feed for these sites, if so i’d pull that down with a cron job and do filtering locally with probably regex.

if not i’d scrape the html and pull out the relevant links with whatever the latest html parser is for the language i use (i.e. it used to be beautiful soup for python, but there’s i think a new better one).

but as i said i’m rather lazy, and haven’t been on the prowl for jobs for some time.

karlhungus,

In my experience only kinda, and by convention (up is on), and three-way switches break this (indicator becomes the light itself).

karlhungus,

Finally some good news! Although I’m sort of surprised this didn’t exist already

karlhungus,

I know halifax has some shit history that i didn’t learn in school – i think i mostly learned about black history from american sources, and my own reading.

karlhungus,

To my limited knowledge (reading www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/1551870) this seems to be the Canadian norm: you don’t own the land under your land

karlhungus,

oh yeah, not saying it’s a good thing at all…

karlhungus,

Not voting is not an excuse when Doug is on the ballot, you still need to vote for the less sucky person.

It’s time to admit that us Ontarians just suck on average.

karlhungus,

You don’t have to, and here we are with what IMO is the worst choice, because you didn’t vote.

karlhungus,

In my experience corporations serve their shareholders (and maybe board and executive s).

karlhungus,

We might live better if this were true (maybe not), but it is not at all their job. Neither is it our job to serve them.

karlhungus,
  1. You are free to not spend money there
  2. If you took this logic and turned it around, i could see an argument saying the moment you stop helping society why should we let you exist

I agree that in the best interests of having a pleasant place to live, or elected officials should force them to sell at not so great a profit. I feel like “they shouldn’t be allowed to exist” is a poor way to put it.

karlhungus,

untrue, many examples first one that comes to mind: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family

karlhungus,

besides the example i gave actually harming people, and them not being in prison, to go from “people who don’t help society” to murder is kind of a stretch isn’t it?

you realize it’s possible to neither help nor harm society.

i am canadian, are we limited to examples only of canadian’s who harm societies, C suite of loblaws isn’t in jail are they?

karlhungus, (edited )

I haven’t read the article…yet (after a skim I agree with the article). I really don’t know how to feel about the gay/trans issue as I’m fine with my kids being gay or trans, but I don’t want anyone dictating to me what religion or philosophy I raise my kids with, so I feel like I shouldn’t get to say what the nut jobs believe it what they tell their children (to a point)… This is tough

You aren’t a parent are you? Cause children will actually hurt themselves badly, and really do need active care at an early age.

For older children setting boundaries for your children so they aren’t assholes is “determining best interests”.

I don’t want people telling me what religion or philosophy to raise my kids in, I kind of think of this as parents rights. Of course as kids get to be adults those go away.

karlhungus,

As a parent, this is a parenting/personal issue, fuck off and please spend my money doing useful things (like supporting health care, or housing) not attempting to protect my children.

karlhungus,

How is it impossible to be true?

I’m not sure how you could make this argument without making assumptions about base crime rates.

karlhungus,

It seems like you maybe thinking this is saying police do nothing, it isn’t.

No consistent association means the data doesn’t back up higher or lower funding having an impact on crime. It doesn’t say anything about rates when the funding is zero or when funding is very high.

I think it means can’t pay to reduce crime, or not pay and expect crime to go up.

Testing for zero would be extremely difficult, because we only have one Toronto sized city in Canada.

I’m guessing here but I suspect that there’s a significant number of places with zero police presence that have very little crime. And this article suggests that there are very well funded police presences where crime still happens.

karlhungus,

Skim the article, it’s 20 large municipality’s, nowhere is 0 mentioned

karlhungus,

Interviews are a crapshoot, and feedback from them is usually valueless. Good luck to you in your future interviews

karlhungus,

I can’t imagine it’s actually like this, im guessing their just surrounded by pro oil propaganda. So they rationalize making gobs of money by believing that they aren’t doing harm.

It’s probably really easy when everything in their life rewards them being pro oil.

karlhungus,

If you bought your house for $600k you should hopefully be prepared to pay that $600k over time, whether or not interest rates go up.

Unfortunate reality is sometimes rates jump, predicting 10 years out what your income will be, and how interest rates change is sort of impossible. IMO a lot of this uncertainty on the part of the buyer is mitigated by history, while the banks only have to take that risk in 5 year chunks (idk if there are longer renewal periods).

faster by kicking people out and foreclosing

short googling seems like people tend to declare bankruptcy first in canada. It all around seems like a terrible situation – and not one we’d want to encourage, hence: we probably shouldn’t actively lower existing housing prices to pandemic or 2010 prices.

karlhungus,

I think I favour building lots of (hopefully well made) public housing, and taxes on non primary dwellings. I’m not in any way an expert though.

I don’t really understand why the statements in your second paragraph are true.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines