Oh, did Tyler also engage in multi-million dollar dealings with foreign adversaries and then give a kick back to his in-office parent? If so, I totally agree.
Oh, did Tyler also engage in multi-million dollar dealings with foreign adversaries and then give a kick back to his in-office parent? If so, I totally agree.
I think you’re misunderstanding how net worth works.
Being a billionaire doesn’t mean that you have a billion dollars of liquid cash laying around. It means your total assets are worth at least a billion dollars. To rapidly translate those assets into liquid cash, you loan against them.
You’re overlooking the fact that those 100,000 voters comprised 13% of the total primary vote. Extrapolate that to the general election, and you’ll see why people are concerned.
A large chunk of Gen Z democrats are so far left and committed to virtue signaling that even the slightest hint of an oppressed minority makes them wet themselves, even if that minority elected a terror cell into office with the explicit aim of genociding an entire country (which it then attempted to do by slaughter hundreds of women and children).
Not sure what game you think I’m playing here. I was talking about a terror cell running into Israel and slaughtering women and children, and you asked how many children were members of that cell — I’m going to assume none, as would most logical people.
I don’t know if you’re trying to defend Hamas but just failing horribly, or you have something else you’re trying to get at but are conveying horribly. In any event, I’m sorry you have so much trouble putting thoughts to words.
I did not involve my father in my business. Not while I was a practicing lawyer, not in my investments or transactions domestic or international, not as a board member, and not as an artist. Never,
I’m curious then, in your mind, why would a third party tell Hunter Biden that Joe Biden would be receiving 10% of the profit from a deal with a Chinese energy company? If that wasn’t the case, wouldn’t Hunter have refuted it? Moreover, why would Hunter be complaining to other family members about having to give Joe half of his earnings?
Seems like all of that lends credibility to Joe’s active involvement in Hunter’s business dealings.
No one is a Biden stan, and no one cares about Hunter.
Lmfao. Bro this site and Reddit are constantly full of posts and comments either trying to circle jerk how great Biden is, or clear Hunter of any wrongdoing. There are a lot of people who stan Biden and clearly car about Hunter.
Y’all have like a kink for them, you’re just trying to deny it so hard.
Here’s the first Reddit thread I found about it, some of the comments:
He's the only person to be charged with this crime while neither having been charged with any sort of substance abuse nor admit to using substances at the time of the gun purchase. The saddest part is Republicans are pursuing this baseless case because of political motivations, and Hunter isn't even a politician. (+211)
I’ve got pictures of me with the most apocalyptically oversized ice cream cone back in June, doesn’t mean I was addicted to ice cream. (+6)
Problem is… it’s a book. Assuming they have no other proof all he has to say was it was made up, or he had the timelines screwed up, or any number of other things. It’s not really a lot to base prosecution on. (+55)
Ive done coke without being addicted (+34)
But he wasn’t in the picture. It was a picture of a picture of NOT drugs. And even if it were a picture of drugs, he wasn’t in it. If you do think this specific picture is problematic, we should systematically go through every gun owner’s computer, email, and social media history. If we find any references, memes, pictures, or pictures of pictures that show drugs or something resembling drugs, we need to take that person to trial. (+25)
Something that countless people have done and not been charged with - lying on a gun form. It’s pretty rich. (+8)
I hate Republicans, but this obviously sounded ridiculous until I looked at the picture. It’s very clearly sawdust. This whole thing is manufactured, and then I saw that their “secret witness” was actually a Russian agent. It was already dumb enough that they were trying to drum up charges against Hunter to go after Joe, but now the whole thing has been revealed as basically disinformation from Putin. The only question that remains is if the Republicans knew the whole time or are they as stupid as they look. (+3)
And again — that’s just the first Reddit post I found lol.
Here’s the first Reddit thread I found about it, some of the comments:
He's the only person to be charged with this crime while neither having been charged with any sort of substance abuse nor admit to using substances at the time of the gun purchase. The saddest part is Republicans are pursuing this baseless case because of political motivations, and Hunter isn't even a politician. (+211)
I’ve got pictures of me with the most apocalyptically oversized ice cream cone back in June, doesn’t mean I was addicted to ice cream. (+6)
Problem is… it’s a book. Assuming they have no other proof all he has to say was it was made up, or he had the timelines screwed up, or any number of other things. It’s not really a lot to base prosecution on. (+55)
Ive done coke without being addicted (+34)
But he wasn’t in the picture. It was a picture of a picture of NOT drugs. And even if it were a picture of drugs, he wasn’t in it. If you do think this specific picture is problematic, we should systematically go through every gun owner’s computer, email, and social media history. If we find any references, memes, pictures, or pictures of pictures that show drugs or something resembling drugs, we need to take that person to trial. (+25)
Something that countless people have done and not been charged with - lying on a gun form. It’s pretty rich. (+8)
I hate Republicans, but this obviously sounded ridiculous until I looked at the picture. It’s very clearly sawdust. This whole thing is manufactured, and then I saw that their “secret witness” was actually a Russian agent. It was already dumb enough that they were trying to drum up charges against Hunter to go after Joe, but now the whole thing has been revealed as basically disinformation from Putin. The only question that remains is if the Republicans knew the whole time or are they as stupid as they look. (+3)
And again — that’s just the first Reddit post I found lol.
That’s just anecdotal evidence from a ten-second search on Google. If you want broad data, take a gander at the USSS’ assessment. 1.6% of mass shooters between 2016-2020 were trans, which is more than three times the percentage of trans population in the U.S.
Thank you for showing just how rare it continues to be for a mass shooter to be trans.
It is indeed rare — because being trans is rare overall. However, trans mass shooters occur in the general population of mass shooters at a rate more than triple their proportion in the general population at-large.
if the actual amount of trans shooters is 0.5% then the chance of that result being less than what it actually is, is 93.7%
Except there isn’t a chance of that — because we know exactly how many mass shootings there have been, and what the gender identity of the shooters are. You’re using statistical extrapolation when there is nothing to extrapolate.
If you knew anything about statistics, you'd know that the confidence interval for pretty much anything to be statistically relevant is 95%, which your data doesn't reach so it's inconclusive at best and trash at worst.
Again, you employ a confidence interval when you’re extrapolating a sample to a larger data group — not when your sample is that entire data group.
Congrats, you just demonstrated that you have no understanding of statistics. Been a while since I’ve seen something so directly and quickly backfire on someone lol.
Oh most certainly I can, it’s just going to be logically defective — just as the “incredibly robust trend line” the other commentator was referencing would be.
Go ahead and try. Whatever you come up with for right wing shooters I’ll give you the logical inverse for LGBTQ shooters. Both will be true, and both will be logically flawed.
Please explain why trans people are not mentioned at ALL in the 'attack elements' or the 'behavioral overview' of the document YOU PROVIDED, but males made up 96% of all mass shooters. (p. 57)
Because trans shooters are a minority, but so is being trans in general. The proportion of mass shooters that are trans is more than triple the proportion of Americans that are trans.
Sorry you’re having so much trouble understanding basic statistics. Your line of logic seems to be that if a certain group does not make up the majority of another group, then the former group cannot be disparately more likely to he involved in the latter group.
See above. Trans mass shooters occur at a rate triple the occurrence of trans in the general population. Do better, take a statistics class (I’m happy to tutor, but my hourly rate is pretty high).
Son of US Representative Boebert arrested on five felony charges (www.reuters.com)
Damn that increase in crime under the Biden administration!
Trump is prepared to post $100 million bond but not the full $454 million judgment, lawyers say (fortune.com)
New York AG Letitia James has said that she will seek to seize some of Trump’s assets if he’s unable to pay the judgment....
Congressman warns Biden to “wake up” after over 100K Michigan Democrats vote “uncommitted” (www.salon.com)
Hunter Biden opens impeachment testimony: ‘I did not involve my father in my business’ (thehill.com)
I did not involve my father in my business. Not while I was a practicing lawyer, not in my investments or transactions domestic or international, not as a board member, and not as an artist. Never,
If Biden loses in November, don’t blame voters who are angry over Gaza | Arwa Mahdawi (www.theguardian.com)
No evidence of rising LGBTQ+ violent extremism or 'trans terrorism' (www.politifact.com)