spez: "you see, we can still draw considerable site traffic on command, so your investment will certainly yield rewards. now, about our upcoming IPO..."
can you not see how that kind of black and white, all-or-nothing attitude is unrealistic in the extreme, and probably harmful to your cause itself?
i support you... as long as it won't cost me my life savings.
I support you... so long as you don't expect me to actually die for the cause.
I support you... as long as you promise not to persecute me, In turn, should you ever come to power.
These are all conditions attached to support. do any of them strike you as unreasonable?
By spouting things like this, you turn away potential support which could prove the difference between success and failure. if someone is willing to financially contribute to a movement, but not have their name publicly associated with that movement, they are still offering support, just not unconditional support.
if you refuse any ally who doesn't offer their unconstitutional support, I guarantee you will alienate nearly 100% of your actual supporters.
r/place in my opinion (feddit.de)
Diablo 4 players plan to boycott Season 1 after “out of touch” 1.1.0 update | Charlie INTEL (www.charlieintel.com)
Allyship doesn't come with conditions (files.catbox.moe)
Image of post by ginnydi:...
Blizzard’s bringing its PC games to Steam, starting with Overwatch 2 (www.polygon.com)
Players will still need a Battle.net account, however