snipgan
snipgan avatar

snipgan

@snipgan@kbin.social

Michigan man who enjoys video games and anime.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

No he didn't.

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

"They're all going to raise it," said Eric Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University. "Trump is going to argue that he and all his merry people were simply ensuring the integrity and fairness of federal elections, something they had an obligation to do, and therefore he has immunity."

Segall said the laws protecting federal officials from state prosecution serve an important purpose. Consider, for instance, federal officials working to desegregate the South during the civil rights era being thrown in jail by state officials opposed to those efforts. But Segall stressed that he doesn’t believe the facts of Trump's intervention will warrant immunity.

He saying that's their approach. Ultimately might come down to the Supreme Court which hasn't favored Trump and similar cases so far.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

That's not what Dershowitz said.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

I just showed you what he said in the articles you provided.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Again. He didn't say that. You are incorrect.

I didn't say anything otherwise.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

This is what he said correct?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.

This what you said, correct?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

It is an error on you.

"I predict there'll be some convictions," speculated the lawyer. "I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast," he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are "rushing" to get their cases against Trump to trial.

He didn't just say Trump would win on appeal or "He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals." He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.

You are being dishonest.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Well........I don't think so?

People love Morrigan from DA:O and she's pretty much a jackass. Made me want to pull my hair out at times, but there's a charm in that making a bad girl go soft in the end.

We shouldn't just slap or imply a "sexist" label when people don't like a character or not, although there's always going to be a variance.

Is there a good example or reason they say this or are they just guessing?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

I guess with that said, what does the female demographic think about Morrigan/Lae'zel?

Even if they are a smaller portion, do they feel the same way or are they significantly differently?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

I definitely think some sort of residuals or compensation for reusing their voice AI should happen if they are profiting off of it.

That being said, I see a world in the very near future where voice actors don't even act out their lines and just say a number of things for recording to train an AI voiced version of themselves. Then directors/creators and just manipulate and use it as they please to create their product.

Some mods in games are getting this already, voiced Morrowind and the like, and I definitely seeing it as a boon. Voice acting has always been a weak point when it came to stuff like that as you can write/script/design the best you can but can lack decent/any voice acting.

Interested to see how things play out.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Early voting has been reported before, at least from what I have read and seen, to be high. All comes down to election day turnout.

Bolds well as early voting typically favors blue leaning voters, which would mean it would be more likely this proposition fails.

Snyder tried to create something similar on his way out in Michigan, but thankfully failed. Now we have legal marijuana, abortion rights, and expanded voting access/protection.

Here's hoping Ohio is on its way as well.

snipgan, (edited )
snipgan avatar

https://www.washingtonpost.com/election-results/2023/ohio-issue-1/

Votes received and percentages of total vote
Response Votes Pct.
Yes 111,710 28.4 %
No 281,694 71.6 %
An estimated 12.6 percent of votes have been counted.

As of 7:50 PM right now.

Edit 1: 7:53 PM
Yes 138,143 29.4 %
No 331,325 70.6 %

Edit 2: 7:55 PM
Yes 158,861 29.1 %
No 387,174 70.9 %

17.5% counted.

Edit 3: 8:04 PM
Yes 193,220 29.7 %
No 457,553 70.3 %

20.8% counted.

Edit 4: 8:19 PM

Yes 232,355 30.9 %
No 519,368 69.1 %

24.1% counted. Yeah I don't see it passing.

Edit 5: 8:25 PM

Wasserman and Decision Desk already called it for No. Will see how big of a margin now, but it is clear the proposition failed.

Edit 6: 8:48 PM

Yes 376,012 37.1 %
No 638,696 62.9 %

32.5% counted.

Edit 7: 8:56 PM

Washington Post projects No winning.

Yes 429,617 38.1 %
No 697,980 61.9 %

36.9% counted.

Edit 8: 9:15 PM

Yes 603,050 40.7 %
No 878,360 59.3 %

47.4% counted. Keep in mind a lot of the urban/city areas haven't even counted most of their votes yet where the more rural areas have.

Edit 9: 9:22 PM

Yes 744,053 42.5 %
No 1,006,127 57.5 %

56% counted.

Edit 10: 9:30 PM

Yes 809,110 42.8 %
No 1,082,764 57.2 %

60.5 % counted. Urban areas still undercounted.

Edit 11: 10:06 PM

Yes 1,100,677 43.2 %
No 1,448,086 56.8 %

81.5% counted.

Edit 12: 10:36 PM

Yes 1,217,867 43.4 %
No 1,585,920 56.6 %

89.7% counted. Cuyahoga and Lucas counties seem to be the ones having a decent chunk to count still. Both heavily leaning No.

Edit 14: 8:33 AM

Yes 1,315,346 43.0 %
No 1,744,094 57.0 %

97.9% counted. Looking like a slam dunk and massive support for No. Winner winner chicken dinner.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

If a childhood chickenpox vaccination programme was introduced, people would not catch chickenpox as children because the infection would no longer circulate in areas where the majority of children had been vaccinated.
This would leave unvaccinated children susceptible to getting chickenpox as adults, when they're more likely to develop a more severe infection or a secondary complication.

So, basically get chicken pox earlier to build immunity, regardless if it makes you more susceptible to shingles, to better protect you from shingles as an adult. Since it is more likely to hurt you as an adult versus as a kid.

Sill seems fine to still vaccinate as that would lower the amount of chickenpox floating around to begin with...

Both options seem reasonable to me, although I would lean on vaccination still.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

I would yes.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

I didn't say there was negligible difference or was talking about big pharma.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Not forced. Require for public schools and such.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

All no.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Still all no.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

What wrong?

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

No, and I explained why.

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

What? I thought we were having a conversation.

Oh well. Vaccinate your kids boys and girls. Chau~

snipgan,
snipgan avatar

Correct.

2 years and younger is recommended to not wear a mask for those reasons.

The parent might not realize it and trying to protect there baby, but this is a classic case of good intentions leading to unintended outcomes.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • GTA5RPClips
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • tester
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines