Posts

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MarkRubin, to random

New article from me:

“Inconsistent multiple testing corrections: The fallacy of using family-based error rates to make inferences about individual hypotheses”

Open access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2024.100140

MarkRubin, to random

New article from me:

“Redundant multiple testing corrections: The fallacy of using family-based error rates to make inferences about individual hypotheses”

Preprint: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.11507

MarkRubin, to random

Prediction vs Accommodation: Which is Better and When?

In this blog post, I summarise the arguments in Pekka Syrjänen’s (2023) recent Synthese article.

https://markrubin.substack.com/p/prediction-vs-accommodation

MarkRubin, to statistics

In this new preprint, I argue that “Type I error rates are not usually inflated.”

https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/3kv2b

mzloteanu,

@MarkRubin this is in the category of "technically yes, but realistically no".

UlrikeHahn,

@MarkRubin Mark, I don’t understand your passage on optional stopping:

“In this case, it is appropriate for the researcher to use an unadjusted αIndividual. Here, αIndividual refers to the maximum frequency with which the researcher would make an incorrect decision to reject the specified statistical null hypothesis during an imaginary long run of repeated
random sampling in which samples are the same size as that used in the final reported test (e.g., N
= 300).” 1/

MarkRubin, to stsing

New article from me:

“The replication crisis is less of a ‘crisis’ in the Lakatosian approach than it is in the Popperian and naïve methodological falsificationism approaches”

Substack: https://markrubin.substack.com/p/popper-lakatos-and-the-replication-crisis

Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/2dz9s







@stsing


@philosophyofscience

MarkRubin,

@psforscher

Thanks Patrick. I'll have a think about this feedback.

clim_risk,

@MarkRubin @stsing @philosophyofscience

In my view a replication crisis could be a sign of Pseudoscience in Lokatos' theory. This could also be targeted at subdisciplines. Therefore, the replication crisis in Psychology could well be described as a crisis.

The question is whether the research could turn progressive.

I am not in the position to evaluate Psychology in this regard.

MarkRubin, to stsing

How does the science reform movement align with broader changes in the academic landscape? Tom Hostler tackles this question in a new article on “Scientific reform, post-academic research, and academic identity”: https://markrubin.substack.com/p/scientific-reform-post-academic-research
🧵👇








@stsing

MarkRubin,

Tom contextualizes the science reform movement in relation to Ziman’s (2000) concept of “post-academic research,” which is research done for instrumental reasons (e.g., to solve a local problem) rather than for its own sake.

Post-academic research has been slowly taking over academia, with the push for industry collaboration a key sign (see also https://markrubin.substack.com/p/the-industrialisation-of-science). But how does science reform align with post-academic research?

MarkRubin,

In my view, Tom’s analysis also helps to explain why replication failures are more troubling in a post-academic context.

In traditional academic research, replication failures are a feature, not a bug. In contrast, in post-academic research, replication failures threaten the usefulness of potential solutions to local problems, and so there’s a pressure to eliminate them.

MarkRubin, to random

Rachel Vanderbilt provides an excellent TikTok response to a question about the replication crisis: 👏

https://www.tiktok.com/@rachelvanderbiltphd/video/7264008971063708974

MarkRubin, to stsing

"Discretion in research practice should perhaps not be seen as a weakness or a fault in the scientific method, but rather an integral part of it."

New preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7dh3t/








@stsing

MarkRubin,

For a summary and my thoughts on this work, see 👇

https://markrubin.substack.com/p/the-preregistration-prescriptiveness

MarkRubin, to psychology

Q: Why do people remain biased even after psychologists have revealed their potential biases?

A: People have a "bias blind spot": They understand that biases exist but they fail to see them in their own attitudes and behaviour.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231178745


@psychology

@socialpsych

MarkRubin, to psychology

More to lose, less to say!

New study (N = 896) suggests that white-collar workers may remain silent in the face of abusive supervision practices because they’re more concerned about losing their status and privileges relative to blue-collar workers.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.07.001


@psychology


@socialpsych

@orgbehavior

geneshackman,

@MarkRubin @psychology @socialpsych @orgbehavior

This study was not a random sample and there is no data on refusal rates. More than likely this is not a representative sample. Also the study was in Turkey. So: the results may not apply to anyone in Turkey outside this sample, and may not apply to anyone outside of Turkey. Although an interesting project, more research is needed.

MarkRubin, to random

🚨 2 0 2 3 🚨

🔺 World's hottest day on record
🔺 Hottest June on record globally
🔺 Extreme marine heatwaves
🔺 Record low Antarctic sea-ice

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66229065

MarkRubin, to random

New USA survey (N > 2,000) finds female instructors in science and engineering are more likely than their male colleagues to disclose to their students that they have depression, anxiety, or a disability.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287795

MarkRubin, to stsing

Metascience News:

@tomstafford provides a round up of the latest metascience news, workshops, conferences, talks, and listservs!

https://open.substack.com/pub/tomstafford/p/anyone-for-metascience







@stsing

MarkRubin, to random

Scrolling, scrolling scrolling….

Our new research finds passive social media use is associated with poorer mental health, especially among younger people.

Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181233

mzloteanu,

@MarkRubin * scrolls, stops to read this post, feels worse, keep scrolling *

MarkRubin, to science

New social psychology research finds conservatives’ beliefs that immigrants aren’t supporting the American system enough explains their bias against immigrants and supports a new “Perceived System Justification Deficit Model of Prejudice”.

Open access: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38347-8



@psychology


@socialpsych


@politicalscience

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines