lina, to random
@lina@neuromatch.social avatar

earlier this year, someone in my feed was posting about their work that sought to challenge/complicate predominant narratives... anyone know who that was? I forgot to bookmark it for later

matrig, to Netflix
@matrig@mastodon.social avatar

Scientists everywhere:
worry about replication crisis, control false discovery rates, match control and treated samples, and cross-validate ROIs to avoid double dipping, selection bias and confirmation bias

Everyone else:
"Have you seen the series on ?"

Picard facepalm meme

MarkRubin, to stsing

New article from me:

“The replication crisis is less of a ‘crisis’ in the Lakatosian approach than it is in the Popperian and naïve methodological falsificationism approaches”

Substack: https://markrubin.substack.com/p/popper-lakatos-and-the-replication-crisis

Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/2dz9s







@stsing


@philosophyofscience

MarkRubin, to stsing

How does the science reform movement align with broader changes in the academic landscape? Tom Hostler tackles this question in a new article on “Scientific reform, post-academic research, and academic identity”: https://markrubin.substack.com/p/scientific-reform-post-academic-research
🧵👇








@stsing

MarkRubin, to stsing

"Discretion in research practice should perhaps not be seen as a weakness or a fault in the scientific method, but rather an integral part of it."

New preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7dh3t/








@stsing

MarkRubin, to stsing
MarkRubin, to science

“Instead of focusing purely on replicability, we should strive to maximize transparency, rigor, and quality in all aspects of research.”

New review summarises the structural, procedural, and community changes following the replication crisis.

Preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/r6cvx/

#Science
#OpenScience
#MetaScience
#MetaResearch
#ReplicationCrisis
#SociologyofScience
#ScienceofScience
#STS

MarkRubin, to random

Preregistration:

Interesting new article in the Journal of Trial and Error proposes that we establish core preregistration criteria (i.e., a minimum amount of information required to consider a preregistration complete) and only award preregistered badges only to articles that meet those criteria.

🦣 Author: @drcpennington

Open access: https://doi.org/10.36850/mr6







arstechnica, to random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

High-temperature superconductor report fails to replicate

Researchers create the same material, see no sign of any unusual behavior.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/05/high-temperature-superconductor-report-fails-to-replicate/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

henry,
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines