It must be a very precise and fortunate failure for Israel that an enemy rocket failed and landed exactly on a hospital and killed hundreds of Palestinians they deem unworthy of humanity.
The western world has blood on its hand by supporting such a criminal state
Artisanal water pipe rockets that can’t kill more than 10 people or bring down one apartment floor, can’t be the same misfired rocket that killed 500 people all at once. they just don’t have the capability for that much damage.
All the proof shows a parking lot with fewer than 10 cars on fire, surrounded by a hospital that’s still standing and usable, and maybe a dozen dead (there might be more, there is no proof of them yet).
Have you seen the picture of the aftermath? It t literally burned 10 cars in a parking lot. It certainly doesn’t look like something that could kill 500 people, especially since it didn’t even touch the building. Really looks like a small misfired rocket to me.
When we point to your crimes against humanity, you tell us to look elsewhere. you must have iron guts to stomach what Israel committed today while keeping a straight face
Well, I’m still waiting for proof from either side before making a judgement call. Haven’t seen any either way yet. I wouldn’t put it past Israel to bomb a hospital, and I also wouldn’t put it past people who burn babies alive to stage a false flag attack.
So, for now, nobody knows who actually did this. There seems to be videos and evidence that can point either way. So you why don’t you take a fucking chill pill and go look at the pictures of what Hamas did last week.
For all you know, you’re about to get some fucking egg on your face if this gets proven to be an attack from within Gaza.
An Israeli gov Spokesperson admitted in a tweet that it was meant to target Hamas but landed on the the hospital. he then deleted the tweet. a few screenshots are circulating still. but doesn’t constitute full proof yet
Even without knowing who did it, if Israel had stopped occupying Palestinian land, killing and displacing civilians as it’s been doing for decades, we probably wouldn’t be here today, or at least, maybe I could feel sorry for them. I’m not justifying Hamas’ recent attack on civilians, it was horrible, but Israel had it coming.
Even without knowing who did it, if Muslims had stopped trying to genocide Israel, murdering them and literally wanting to push them into the sea for decades, we certainly wouldn’t be here today, or at least, maybe I could feel sorry for them. I’m not justifying Israel’s past attacks on civilians, they were horrible, but Palestine had it coming.
I mean, they both had their fair chances of accepting a peace deal, but for some reason that didn’t work out. Anyways, there’s ony one of the two countries currently occupying territories of the other, and that’s where my bias come from, but yeah, they’re both murderers.
I mean that’s exactly my point: they were not able to negotiate a peace deal in good faith, which means they preferred war instead. Note I’m not familiar with that specific episode. I was thinking e.g. the assassination or Rabin by one of his own people
No, history began with the British exit, and also omits a dozen wars of aggression against Israelis and Hamas’ charter that states their mission is the eradication of all Jews everywhere… Oh, right, Arafat was a peacemaker of course too.
Christ this is grim. Forced conscription means anyone is fair game? Not having a decision is basically the same thing as having one, so morals have no say in this discussion.
You sound like a fucking cartoon villain, think about that.
I didn’t say civilians, mind you, I said “Israel”, but let’s talk about the civilians: they voted for this government over and over for decades (minus the brief pause last year), and similar ones before, so at least the majority of them bears some responsibility as well. I’m only sorry for that minority of Israeli that wanted peace and voted for someone else.
considering that Hamas had to fight a civil war to actually get control of Gaza and the Netanyahu government has been supporting Hamas to weaken the less radical PAs ability to actually negotiate a solution, no, the Palestinians actually have less to do with keeping Hamas in power, as compared to the Israeli government
Actually you, again, literally said the thing… you referred to the civilians. They are the victims from the Israeli perspective. But tell me, what did I miss?
So all Americans should have their kids raped and murdered in front of them bc Trump or the decades of conservatives before him elected by half the population at best?
Minority in Israel? You ever talk to Israelis? Nobody under middle age votes this way and most of the older people I know are the same.
You’re an ignorant fuck.
Btw did you see who actually blew up the hospital? Apologize cunt.
Who is funding that government exactly? Certainly not the USA and “the west”, who prefer to fund Israel instead: a country doing exactly the same, but on a larger scale, and calling different, more socially acceptable names (e.g. “casualties” vs killings). Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Good point! A large amount of humanitarian funding does come from the US, EU, and UN. But a good chunk of military funding also comes from genocidal, fascist regimes such as Iran! Don’t forget about them and their critical funding for Palestine’s “military”.
What I see is, two terrorists doing terror attacks on each others. Some countries fund one terrorist, others fund the other terrorist. One just happen to have a lot more funding. If only they would make a peace deal … ah yeah, they tried that, didn’t work …
The biggest financial backer of the Palestinian Authority is “the west.” Unless you don’t consider Europe part of the west. The United States is also a substantial financial backer of the Palestinians, though not as much as Europe. About 64% of pledged international funds come from “the west” with only 20% coming from Arab sources.
Not arguing that the US doesn’t give far more money to Israel which is of course true, but I think with these complex situations it’s important to be precise about facts.
That’s why Israel obviously didn’t do this. Not that this community cares. They want any excuse to attack Israel. I’m already seeing posts calling for death to Israel.
I've seen a thread where someone suggested building a canal through the whole region and a replying saying to glass the whole region. Granted, they wanted both sides wiped out, because somehow a group of people within each region committing violence justifies nuking the entire region?
Not exactly common sentiments either: out of 100s of comments, those are the only two I've seen along those lines. No clue where they were and I'd they may have been removed by mods, making them harder to find (but mod logs do exist), so unfortunately I can't link to them.
Cops have the perp cornered in his car, so why didn’t they let the air out of all four tires, and sit in the squad car eating doughnuts until he gets bored and gives up?
Nah, we still need police. But literally only a small fraction of what we have now. And a fraction of the budget allotted to them. And a MASSIVE retooling of the hiring process. We need to hire good, empathetic, smart people who want to serve and protect. Not these highschool C student bullies looking for everyone around them to respect their authoritah
That’s not how reality works. You NEED police. The problem is that in the USA you don’t have police, you basically have a government funded maffia with thug enforcers.
How about “restructure police”? Much better. You’ll actually end up with a service that serves and protects
I might be for it if basically the entire body of research on the economic and social impacts said anything good about it at all. Inner city arenas not only kill the Chinatown but also increase crime, drive down per capita wages, cause traffic and pollution, and chew up space that could be for something good like a park or a condo tower.
Billionaire David Adleman can fuck right off with his land grab.
Is there an example of going of the deep end in this article? It’s about the radicalization of the GOP? I’m not seeing anything negative in here about Montco. Unless you’re just saying anything liberal=bad?
Was the pool analogy too much for you? I thought it illustrated going “all in” to one side.
And no, I’m not saying anything liberal is bad. Don’t put words in my mouth. Healthy competition is important otherwise you get stuck with “more of the same, forever” regardless of what that “same” is.
Someday third parties in PA will get an actual fair chance, but I won’t hold my breath.
You should read the rest of the Wikipedia article where it clearly shows the usage going back to the 1950’s and past.
“Blue Lives Matter” you are correct. “The Thin Blue Line” is decades old, if not over a century.
You know who fomented the war on cops? President Obama. He pushed the “us vs them” mentality. Unprovoked ambushes on officers sitting in their cars really started during his second term. All the while, he was continuing to allow departments to request military armored vehicles and weaponry. Playing both sides of the field for what purpose?
I know I’m potentially arguing with many who cannot or will not ever see both sides of an argument, and whoever believes different must be wrong.
Is it strange to ANYONE that most of BLM’s heroes were in fact breaking the law, resisting lawful arrests, or putting others in danger? Probably not who I’d put on a pedestal, they weren’t martyrs.
I’m not lumping Floyd in this argument, he was definitely unjustly killed by that cop.
6abc.com
Hot