cfiesler,
@cfiesler@hci.social avatar

Law peeps again: I'm hearing that TikTok itself plans to sue on free speech grounds. Can someone explain to me how they would have standing? This is not my area of expertise, but I was expecting there to be 1A lawsuits with TikTok users as plaintiffs, and then TikTok itself suing on different (economic?) grounds.

jtlg,
@jtlg@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar

@cfiesler We'll see what the NetChoice cases hold, but TikTok should have standing as the creator of an expressive editorial product (like parade organizers or a newspaper choosing which letters to the editor to print). There's also caselaw to the effect that speakers and listeners have standing to raise each others’ First Amendment rights; that's part of the theory of commercial and corporate speech rights.

cfiesler,
@cfiesler@hci.social avatar

@jtlg Ahhhhh okay yes, that makes sense, thank you! In your opinion, would it be a better strategy though for there to be users as plaintiffs? (Or maybe we're just going to see both.)

jtlg,
@jtlg@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar

@cfiesler There are both kinds of lawsuits in challenges to state-level bans, and it seems like a good strategy here too.

cfiesler,
@cfiesler@hci.social avatar

@jtlg this tiktok thing will be an interesting addition to your casebook!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines