astrid,
@astrid@fedi.astrid.tech avatar

I'm of 2 minds on ipv4 minimum announcement sizes and I don't know which is better

  • shrink the minimum to /28 to alleviate exhaustion
  • grow the minimum to /20 to accelerate exhaustion. ipv6 acceleationism
whitequark,
@whitequark@mastodon.social avatar

@astrid which one prevents rent seekers from profiting?

puppygirlhornypost,
@puppygirlhornypost@transfem.social avatar

@astrid grow the minimum to /8 ​:cat:​

astrid,
@astrid@fedi.astrid.tech avatar
puppygirlhornypost,
@puppygirlhornypost@transfem.social avatar

@astrid i mean if you think about it a /64 is half of a /128 so if you want to just copy ipv6 minimum allocation to end users... everyone gets a /16. if a /48 is the minimum... /12 ​:cat:​ i mean that would have near the same effect as a /8 but would fall under "just copying ipv6's ratios hehe"

puppygirlhornypost,
@puppygirlhornypost@transfem.social avatar

@astrid that would break so many things that nobody would want to use the internet anymore case closed

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • khanakhh
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines