nf3xn,
@nf3xn@mastodon.social avatar

@nyquildotorg The article like every ergo propter hoc draws a single least likely conclusion. Instrument failure is contra-indicative. Clearly readings cannot be trusted. I am not surprised instruments with wacky readings fail immediately thereafter. And where are these "still images"? Iphone out the cockpit window? Do we draw from what we see in the radar what we think we see (a balloon). I think lying is a bit strong here. Just not interested in the pedo distraction bullshit.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • everett
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • mdbf
  • Durango
  • khanakhh
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines