fulanigirl, to random
@fulanigirl@blacktwitter.io avatar

I was accused of being argumentative today because I corrected a point of law in someone’s post. There’s very few conversations I get involved with because I get it that sometimes people are just expressing their intense emotions. EX: FASCISM!! But whenever I see a point of law being discussed that is wrong or misleading, I’m going to jump in for a couple of reasons. The offended person can block me, its OK. Short thread 1/5

fulanigirl,
@fulanigirl@blacktwitter.io avatar

One- so few Americans know or understand our legal system I think its important to help with their civic education. Two, we have readers who are not Americans and they may be baffled by how our system works. And finally, to help reduce the possibility of misinformation. Gag orders have come up quite a bit in the Trump cases so I’m going to say something about that. 2/5

fulanigirl,
@fulanigirl@blacktwitter.io avatar


Gag orders although not routinely put in place are not that rare, particularly in high profile cases. Both lawyers and defendants can have their speech restricted. You may recall when the judge in the RICO case when ruling against the defendants request to have Willis removed said he would at some point consider a motion for a gag against Willis because of the speech she made at the church on MLK Jr. day. So, even lawyers have speech restricted. 3/5

fulanigirl,
@fulanigirl@blacktwitter.io avatar

In some cases like Trump’s, the defendant’s speech is restricted and violations can lead to fines and possibly a short imprisonment as Merchan pointed out. Sometimes despite warning defendants and/or their lawyers will violate the gag order. This will lead to another Order to Show Cause hearing. You’ll see that on Thursday when Merchan returns to the DA’s motion from last week. Repeated violations can lead to incarceration. 4/5

fulanigirl,
@fulanigirl@blacktwitter.io avatar

Repeated violations can help demonstrate that the defendant intends to violate the speech restraints. The violations do not in any way relieve the prosecutor of his burden to prove all of the elements of the crimes in the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt. Nor, are they proof of the guilt or innocence of the defendant in the underlying case. Its not Trump’s case obviously, but you can be guilty of contempt and also not guilty of the crimes you were charged with. 5/5

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

1/…🧵

Let’s start with this, via @darthstar, because NY has laws that govern . I heard the Legals on TV say the same thing as Sean here:

https://mastodon.online/@darthstar/112320741962522803

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Adam Klasfeld:

NEWS:

A NY appellate court REJECTS the challenge brought by and his lawyers opposing their .

Trump dealt another defeat in his gag order fight, as an intermediate court rejects another story.

✔️Via @lolgop :

So in America you can go from having a gag order on you to being a dictator in about 13 months. Thanks, Electoral College!

spocko, to random
@spocko@mastodon.online avatar

@emptywheel reminded us, real people are hurt when Defendant Trump violates his pretrial conditions & .
She said, Talk about the EFFECTS of Trump's incitement, DON'T repeat his THREATS!

Last month Lisa Rubin talked about the scope & volume of threats to 's clerk. @chrislhayes called the EFFECT on Engoron's clerk "unacceptable." Focus on the rights of the victims.
BTW Marcy is on now 5Pm EST 12-8-2023
@nicolesandler https://nicolesandler.com/listen-live/
@GottaLaff

Lisa Rubin talks about the 275 single spaced pages of transcribed threats to Judge Engoron's clerk on. Chris Hayes

spocko, to FreeSpeech
@spocko@mastodon.online avatar

Are you thinking about On ? Listen to this GREAT podcast from my friend @charliejane & @annaleen
about language, 1984 & how the tech companies took the wrong lesson from the book.
Esp 27:20 about & & 31:00 where Nesrine Malik, author of We Need New Stories, talks about how we need to actually understand how speech affects people & want needs to be done. Regulation? Moderation? Punishment?
https://www.ouropinionsarecorrect.com/shownotes/2023/8/23/episode-135-the-myth-of-free-speech

slcw, to random
@slcw@newsie.social avatar

This is moving from to explicit calls for . These need to impose full backed by immediate, substantial for violations. Someone is going to get killed if the courts don't act.

https://boingboing.net/2023/11/14/trump-posts-call-for-citizens-arrest-of-judge-engoron-and-letitia-james.html

marcel, to random German
@marcel@waldvogel.family avatar

und wurden vor ein paar Monaten Adressdaten von Hunderttausenden Abonnentinnen und persönlichste Daten von aktuellen und ehemaligen Mitarbeitern geklaut. Die wenigsten haben davon gehört. Statt aktiver Information gab es : Superprovisorische Verfügungen gegen die Information durch andere Medien. @adfichter zeigt auf, ordnet ein und gibt Empfehlungen ab. 💐
https://www.republik.ch/2023/07/04/die-stille-nach-dem-datenklau

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • vwfavf
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines