@fink@pasci_lei a) Ich lese bei OP einen ironischen Unterton. b) Eine Person, die genug versteht, um sich eine SearXNG-Instanz zu suchen, bzw. versteht warum man das tun koennte, die hat, vermute ich stark, auch genug Hintergrundwissen, um sich auch durch eine passende Anleitung zu arbeiten. Dass das keine Loesung fuer das Gros ist, ist, finde ich, offensichtlich.
@estherschindler I happen to be subscribed to both and from a taxonomy perspective I'm in favour of including both general and specific, as you'll reach a wider audience. That said, the more general the tag, the more "spammy" the subscription, e.g. network telescope bots, etc., so the more likely I am to unsubscribe if the deluge of those can't reasonably be contained via judicious filters and blocks. This is rare though, for me.
@daniel_meyers@lzg Seconded, it's a very explorable-on-foot city in summer, I especially loved areas like Bergmannstrasse (but there are many more; just keep in mind that going across the entire city is quite a challenge; better go to a selected Kiez by subway and then spend the day exploring it)
@mugaizzo Full Ack. Sometimes there's comedy gold in those acronyms though, and one wonders whether noone bothered googling for it with safe-search off... /me eyes a certain "Cross-Border Trade" poster ;-)
I don't think there's a generally correct answer for this question (please refrain from attempting to convince me or others otherwise), rather I'm curious about your own hunch.
"#DnD combat quantifies the bodily integrity of all its participants through “hit points,” with the roleplaying conversation unable to proceed beyond combat itself until the enemies’ hit points are reduced to zero"
To those concerned about #slack now using your chats, including trade secrets, NDA stuff, etc., to train their #llm: #WTF did you expect using a third party with full content access to discuss those things? That they'd be gentlemen and not read your mail? That they somehow wouldn't try to find a way to monetize that juicy data? I am flabbergasted that people working for corporations just as immoral could have been that naive...
@bpavuk Judging by my timeline a lot of people seem to care now; I am confused as to how they either a) didn't see it coming at all (read: naive in face of overwhelming prior examples) or b) managed to actively "not care" until it was "too late" (Hint: It was "too late" the second you put data in, not when you learned that they are using it). "a)" I can imagine, like a character in a bad novel, though it's a tall order; "b)" on the other hand... My brain does not work like that. At all. Of course there is always c) The people now clamoring are not ones that did, in fact, choose (they might have still been forced to) to use slack in the first place, but are merely expressing their indignation by stylistically putting themselves in that position to increase emotional involvement. Those are... vacuous...
Surely I can't be the only person whose first reaction to seeing a company is named "Hugging Face" is to wonder if they sell Alien xenomorphs bloodily bursting out of human abdominal cavities as a service?
i regularly maintain sync between canoeboot and libreboot, ensuring that they have the same functionalities (with canoeboot excluding certain behaviours/code)
this change, on both projects, makes merging changes between them much easier, by reducing the number of merge conflicts
libreboot build system audit 5 is ongoing, and i'm keeping caoneboot in sync throughout.
@libreleah Let me just say that I am very happy that you continue t.o support canoeboot, while I'm inclined to agree with you assessment of the RYF policy, it is great to have the option on more limited hardware (some of which I happen to own ;-) )
given how complex and, by extension, vulnerable, the modern "web" has become, are there any sort of "gopher 2.0" projects out there that aim to provide a reasonably nice browsing experience, without having so much flexibility that you can cut your head off?
@bobdobberson Search queries are customarily sent via "GET" requests: <gemini://example.net/search?the%20user%20input>, there are search engines relying on this. Gemini deliberately does not include a method for sending large blobs of data, there was an effort on a companion spec called "Titan" that'd allow essentially "PUT", but implementer interest was low.
@bobdobberson The example I gave is right from the spec: https://geminiprotocol.net/docs/protocol-specification.gmi#input-expected CGI is completely orthogonal, as that is a question of how the server is implemented. People use "GET"-requests for search engines, chat, etc. And SSH client certificates for auth/login. Sure, it has fewer features than HTTP, because that is the entire point, to have as few features as possible and prevent future feature creep as much as possible at the same time (e.g. the response header cannot be extended in a compliant way).
Question for #infosec crowd. I've always stayed away from TouchID (or similar) due to not wanting Apple (or other companies) to have access to my fingerprint. Am I wrong?
@mr_oova Most fingerprint detection systems built into mobile devices (not sure about TouchID specifically) store the biometric data locally, often in a "secure element", so, at least pro forma, the vendor does not get access to it. However, since the vendor controls the entire OS around it, one has to assume they can get access, at minimum when you unlock the device. Stationary scanners tend to be connected to databases directly, they don't even pretend otherwise. Also: In many jurisdictions you can be legally compelled (usually incarcerated until you comply, more or less indefinitely) to provide your fingerprints to police, which is often not true for passwords. They are easy to obtain against your will anyway (for example I have the fingerprint of former minister of the interior of Germany, Wolfgang Schaeuble, as a literal stamp right here: https://shop.digitalcourage.de/stempel/stempel-schaeubles-fingerabdruck.html), and you have a limited number of fingers you can lose (physically, or through aforementioned shenanigans) before that becomes a problem; Not to mention how many systems get very suspicious if you insist on using a different finger from their default, because the staff do not understand these implications. In short: Stay away from biometrics. They seem convenient until they really aren't; And they can be stolen, faked, and abused easily (especially bad compared to the nimbus of "security" they enjoy).
@markusreuter Kannst darauf wetten: Da hat sich eine_r persoenlich zur Aufgabe gemacht gehabt, so eine Instanz hinzustellen und das an allen Vorgesetzten vorbei (mit Kopfnickendem Einverstaendnis, aber ohne echten Plan) einfach umgesetzt. Und jetzt geht die Person entweder in Rente/Pension/einen anderen Laden, oder bekommt staendig mehr "wichtigere" Aufgaben auf den Schreibtisch und hat deshalb einfach keine Zeit mehr dazu und sonst interessiert es halt keinen ausreichend. Die zweitwahrscheinlichste Version ist, dass das irgendjemand von den "Alteingesessenen", aus einer anderen Abteilung nicht gefaellt (Kostet nix -> Ist gefaehrlich oder illegal und support gibt's dann ja offensichtlich auch nicht, und ohne den geht ja garnichts; Brauche ich nicht, also warum machen wird das? Etc.) und weil dass dann ein Riesenrad wird laesst man es lieber wieder sein.
It turns out that in Norwegian "Gå løp" literally means "Go run". Not sure if those words in Norwegian are used together in such way very often, but at least I found some examples.
I'm amused that this sounds almost exactly like "Gallop" in English (BTW, there's a word "Галоп" in Russian that sounds almost identical to "Gallop".)
@loke@avp According to wiktionary the common Proto-Germanic word is "*hlaupaną" which goes realtively directly to things like German "laufen", Sater-Frisian "loopen", Swedish "löpa", Norwegian "løp", etc. while the Old French "galoper" stems from Frankish "*wala hlaupan" (running well).
@Cyberagentur 14 Tage Schweigen im Walde... OK, hier sind zwei Hints: 1. Ich habe einen gravierenden Kardinalfehler begangen, und 2. die erste Nachricht lehnt sich deutlich an Ihre an.
