Posts

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

@pluralistic your innovation article immediately brought to mind Carliss Baldwin and Eric von Hippel's seminal work on the nature of innovation, and how open collaborative activity is really the engine of innovation in the modern economy. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

Reminds me of when mobile carriers started “enhancing” requests to monetize their knowledge of customers. https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/28/paypal_ad_network/

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar
jeroen,
@jeroen@secluded.ch avatar

@huitema @feld @mnot those lists are run by Mozilla (for Linux distro), Google (who own >80% of browser market) and la bit at Microsoft.... only a few mostly anonymous/inaccessible blobs with big legal departments. LetsEncrypt sponsored by... ah the above.

ccTLDs tend to be covered by law of their local government; .com though is a US corporation.... I know I can walk into the SWITCH.ch offices ;) [and why my primary domain is .ch ;) ]

But yes, complex...

feld,
@feld@bikeshed.party avatar

@jeroen @huitema @mnot .com, .net, and .org are all operated by Verisign who is happy to bend over for the federal government here and do whatever is asked of them

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar
mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

If you implement or use HTTP at scale, you might be interested in attending the HTTP Workshop.

The workshop is 2-3 days of lightly structured discussion; we rely on the depth of experience in the room to make it a valuable event.

We also welcome students and want to diversify our community, so please express your interest if you're not sure!

https://httpworkshop.org

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

It’s common for voluntary technical standards developing organisations (SDOs such as the IETF and W3C) to make decisions by consensus, rather than (for example) voting. This post explores why we use consensus, what it is, how it works in Internet standards and when its use can become problematic.

https://www.mnot.net/blog/2024/05/24/consensus

ArneBab,
@ArneBab@rollenspiel.social avatar

@mnot thank you!

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar
mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

Nope, nope nope nope nope nope. Switching back to Terminal.app.

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

The thing is, if you asked ANYONE outside Australia ‘who is Gina Rinehart’ last week, you would have got a blank stare. This portrait is now how she will be known and remembered.

szescstopni,
@szescstopni@qoto.org avatar

@mnot @pluralistic We're renaming the Streisand Effect. This might fuck up scientific literature a bit, and search engines will struggle with Rinehart Effect, but the whole academic paper structure and search engines are fucked up anyway. And LLMs will fuck it up too, because there are two famous portraits within a few days of each other.

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

Also, great quote:

“Namatjira’s political leaders all look frozen, dull behind the eyes, whiter than white, and as if battling an internal war with their fakery and greed.”

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/art-and-design/by-resisting-exposure-gina-rinehart-painted-a-portrait-of-the-streisand-effect-20240517-p5jegg.html

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

Well put.

“Rinehart seems to want to use her money for cultural influence. Namatjira uses his talent to the same end.

She wants to control her public image, and will deploy people financially dependent on her to that end. His art is a subversion of that control.

Rinehart’s attempts at censorship have only elevated Namatjira and brought his work to a new audience.”

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/art-and-design/by-resisting-exposure-gina-rinehart-painted-a-portrait-of-the-streisand-effect-20240517-p5jegg.html

spmatich,
@spmatich@ioc.exchange avatar

@mnot
the story is on Colbert also, 2m20s
https://youtu.be/D_XKBIgVhxc

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

I have changed my desktop resolution and it is messing with my mind

icing,
@icing@chaos.social avatar

@mnot I know about new year resolutions. What are desktop resolutions?

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

When the advertising folks get introspective for a moment.

https://www.admonsters.com/privacy-signals-ai-in-advertising-the-democratic-dilemma/

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

A quick overview/review of a book that I found fascinating: "Design Rules Volume 1: The Power of Modularity" by Carliss Baldwin and Kim Clark. It ties together a lot of themes I've ben focused on, and there's even more interesting followup work!

https://www.mnot.net/blog/2024/05/10/design-rules-vol-one

mnot, to random
@mnot@techpolicy.social avatar

I say this with the deepest consideration -- fuck StackOverflow.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines