mojo_raisin

@mojo_raisin@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

mojo_raisin,

Agree, feeling entitled to a whole other species to direct it’s evolution for our own purposes is wrong on it’s own*. To then let “less desirable” animals die in favor of “more desirable” for what amounts to a fashion choice for most people is sickening.

  • While we should not perpetuate the domination of other species, we should care for those animals that need our help.

Netanyahu says deadly Israeli strike in Rafah was the result of a 'tragic mistake' (apnews.com)

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that a “tragic mistake” was made in an Israeli strike in the southern Gaza city of Rafah that set fire to a camp housing displaced Palestinians and, according to local officials, killed at least 45 people....

mojo_raisin,

Biden: This isn’t a genocide, so sure


Disclaimer: Voting Biden because Trump will expand the genocide to vulnerable groups here and usher in christian nationalism.

mojo_raisin,

You’re thinking of things wrong and it’s leading you to silly conclusions.

Voting for president is not about voting for the person that will solve of our problems.

Stop looking to the state to solve our problems, that is not it’s purpose, it does not have this ability.

Real problems are solved by people.

Voting for U.S. president is a strategic choice we’re allowed every four years, choose the option that makes your life and/or job easier. If you’re really concerned about genocide, choose the option for president that will make your job of anti-war activist easier and safer.

Understand that many of your anti-war allies are LGBTQ, and that if Trump wins, he is almost certainly going to make it much harder for your allies to survive, let alone be activists. Why would you throw your allies under the bus to make an ideological point like 16 people on Lemmy will see?

mojo_raisin,

Why do Windows users feel entitled to the free labor of others.

I don’t think open source developers should feel obligated to chase after “normal users”, they should just make great software. Linux is arguably the most successful OS that has ever existed, if it’s not dominant in one specific shrinking sector is that the worst thing in the world?

Linux (+ everything needed for a desktop) has been a great desktop system for 20+ years, most difficulties aren’t the fault of Linux, they’re the fault of vendors failing to support and/or Microsoft throwing up barriers to competition.

mojo_raisin,

Sure Ok, now their part of the deal – the corporations making and selling this food agree to (they’d need to be forced to of course) stop propagandizing us, manipulating us, addicting us, and lying to us.

mojo_raisin,

Scandalous! Where can I hear more about this ABC, DEF, JKL love triangle?

mojo_raisin,

I think constantly bringing it up to people all the time is more of a disservice.

The trans community is tiny, I’m an almost 50 year old trans woman transitioned over 20 years ago. The reason we have the rights we do is because it’s “brought up all the time”. When I transitioned, it was rarely brought up, this was because most people were scared of the social and economic consequences of doing so. This is all changing because we talk about it rather than be quiet and let people keep us down. I’d imagine even you might have more negative views of trans people if the only exposure you had was from talk shows promoting us as freaks, this is how it was before.

Other than that, your attitude is fine, not everyone needs to be interested.

mojo_raisin,

I get the sentiment, that we’re not killing nature, just ourselves, but “nature” is not one thing. Killing nature amounts to humans causing incredible suffering to untold trillions of individual animals each with a lilfe, a consciousness.

I saw my Kitty suffocate due to embolism and had to put her down and it’s no less of an awful event because it was a cat and not a human, it screwed me up and it was years ago. I imagine that level of needless suffering happening every day X 1 billion due to human greed and apathy.

mojo_raisin,

Pretty sure I already specified unnecessary suffering, I didn’t suggest that animals wouldn’t suffer without us.

mojo_raisin, (edited )

So only the lucky unfit sperm destined to produce one who wears a red cap will be able to successfully fertilize the egg?

mojo_raisin,

X considers “cisgender” a slur, and moderates it over actual slurs

Is this news? It’s like saying “Half-eaten meal and dirty diapers found in garbage”, uh, ya.

mojo_raisin, (edited )

He’ll be dead after a second term lol. It’s a (evil) miracle he’s made it this far on a cocaine and fast food diet.

mojo_raisin,

I’ve heard the same, I also know he’s a liar and drugs were known to be all over the White House when he was president. I can believe he doesn’t drink, but his personality and behavior (e.g. working/tweeting hours) say cocaine to me.

reuters.com/…/trump-white-house-pharmacy-improper…

rollingstone.com/…/trump-white-house-drugs-speed-…

nbcnews.com/…/white-house-clinic-improperly-distr…

mojo_raisin,

It’s time to return to human curated directories.

mojo_raisin,

Nope, been thinking about what it would take to make one though.

mojo_raisin,

“Dehomed” is almost more appropriate for many without a home. Their homes were taken by resource hoarders using the tools of state.

mojo_raisin,

Each downvote is like a tiny pin pricking my soul.

mojo_raisin,

This is true, the world is not black and white.

mojo_raisin,

I’d say exploitative (and dominant) behavior can be either biologically based instinct or learned trait.

Learned behavior could potentially become a trait if it spreads, is beneficial to the species reproductive success, and genetic mutations occur.

  • A nice person can learn that to survive requires them to act in an exploitative manner, I’d not call this an instinct, this is a animal of an adaptable species adapting to a cruel environment.
  • A person that is not nice because they are less adaptable and see exploitation as the default way of operating in life and would act this way even in a nice environment could be called an instinct. This could be the biological start of what could evolve into a stable instinct in a species should this person’s genes become dominant in the population (I believe this is happening now).

The reason I talk the way I do on this topic, is my belief that early humans did not have a desire to dominate others on a large scale, we were more like other animals. Not that everything was peaceful or tribes didn’t have leaders and inter-tribal battles, just that any individuals with a tendency to dominate and hoard were mostly taken care of by cultural mechanisms and didn’t get very far, i.e. they got their ass beat when then screwed over their brother and the community said “good, they deserved it”. Or a tribal leader that was dominant and coercive rather than a respected leader could get killed and there’s no state to stop this or punish those who did it. The tribe decided their leader was bad for them and took care of the issue.

But at some point, these cultural mechanisms were not enough to contain these individuals with a dominant instinct and they took over and colluded, and this eventually evolved into the concept of the state.

The thing that might’ve tipped the scales is money. Money provides a means to hoard wealth, something that is difficult without money as things rot or or too large, etc. By hoarding money that represents resources, they are simultaneously creating artificial scarcity and those willing to violently back up the dominant hoarder can have more than others setting up a class structure. This is a bit different than for example how Marx says classes came about.

tl;dr I think our society was stable for 200K years until a dominator instinct took over that was previously kept in check culturally, facilitated by the invention of money. This situation exploded when we found our fossil energy inheritance that we’re currently wasting on the equivalent on hookers and blow. And now society is built around the dominators, designed for easy exploitation and prevention of self-defense, it’s called “statehood”.

mojo_raisin, (edited )

Isn’t “the state” just cultural mechanisms extended beyond familial or interpersonal ties?

This is “community”

“State” refers to a group of people that feel entitled to rule over others and use violence to do so. To help ensure their power they create laws that make their violence legal and give it names like “law enforcement” and make your violence, particularly violence to protect yourself against them, illegal. This typically goes along with enclosure leaving people nowhere to escape the state.

There’s a threshold where the group becomes too numerous for a member to form social ties with all other members.

This is true but does not on it’s own lead to the formation of state. Without dominator types successfully taking advantage of the situation, it could just as well lead to loosely connected communities. Also, the size of early non-state communities was limited to ecosystem provided resources (i.e. they were inherently sustainable), our populations are not because we found fossil energy.

Domination and “the state” are not equivalent, but it takes the former for the latter to come about. Domination without the state has always existed on some level, I think that pre-state societies had cultural mechanisms to prevent dominators from taking over.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines