gimulnautti, 21 days ago (edited 21 days ago) @JoshuaHolland One thing I don’t get about the safety rhetoric though. How does one reason one should feel safe about inhabiting a land where the original inhabitants were chased out between 1936 and 1967? It’s the time. It’s such a recent event. And it was 700000 people. Droves still alive. How does one condemn them for reminescing about their lost homes, claiming ”threat” because they sing songs about what they lost and want back? This I don’t understand.
@JoshuaHolland One thing I don’t get about the safety rhetoric though.
How does one reason one should feel safe about inhabiting a land where the original inhabitants were chased out between 1936 and 1967?
It’s the time. It’s such a recent event. And it was 700000 people. Droves still alive.
How does one condemn them for reminescing about their lost homes, claiming ”threat” because they sing songs about what they lost and want back?
This I don’t understand.