ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

I've noticed that when I share related material ANYWHERE, I get less engagement. I sometimes get outright hostility. If I respond to AI-naysayers anywhere, I try to give detailed, thoughtful answers, always with personal experience and often with resources to back up my claims.

The hostility to generative AI is real and the outright denialism is amazing. People are regularly making bold claims that were true a year ago, but not today.

Why does opinion trump evidence?

caseyjennings,
@caseyjennings@sfba.social avatar

@ovid Perhaps because AI is a threat. AI seems to be supported by businesses that are saying they want to use AI to displace workers. To save money by laying off people. There is no guarantee that those displaced will find work and certainly no assurance that the work will pay more or be more secure than the jobs they had before being displaced by AI. It seems perfectly reasonable to view AI as a threat to workers.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ai
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • normalnudes
  • GTA5RPClips
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines