fiat_lux,

Maybe enough to make a huge difference. To be clear, I have zero problem with the concept of wealth redistribution to better achieve some kind of equitable outcome (that ideally isn't at the cost of the environment, which is the big reason that the top global richest will need to give up a lot of travel ).

I just think a lot of the people who are keen for "eat the rich", especially in its more violent forms, may not realise they're on the menu themselves when the issue is looked at from a global all-of-humanity perspective. And, I encourage people to really think about who and what is included or excluded in the definitions of "rich", what level of variation is acceptable to them, and what a sustainable living situation even looks like for the world's population if we had total equality. They're all very hard questions that I don't have an answer to either.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • PowerRangers
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • tsrsr
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • Leos
  • rosin
  • tacticalgear
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • vwfavf
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • anitta
  • All magazines