letsgo,

It works OK for me, but I’m in the UK so maybe it’s subscription only for foreigners.

Kallioapina,
@Kallioapina@lemmy.world avatar

FYI Running Ublock Origin is enough to grant access to this dictionary, among others. At least seems to work for me without any paywalls (unless its a geoblock? I’m looking at it from the Nordics).

boyi, (edited )

One way to get access to OED ODE without paying a cent is by using kindle app. When you highlight an English word, if will open the dict. You can search for any word from there.

current,

This is why you should instead use Wiktionary and donate your child’s entire college fund to the Wikimedia foundation

possiblylinux127,

There are plenty of other dictionaries and some of them are made of something called paper.

Gestrid,

What is… “pah-per”?

IDriveWhileTired,

That’s the stuff Bill Buttlicker was trying to buy from that rude salesperson.

cupcakezealot, (edited )
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

thats not bad actually. joey tribbiani had to pay $50 and he only got the v words

Mr_Blott,

I just paid a one off fee for the Chambers app. It’s just as comprehensive

SteveTech,
cashews_best_nut,

Cambridge dictionary is free.

stoly,

Wasn’t it always a subscription? You really would only have easy access in a university library.

where_am_i,

If the dictionary was free for all, how do you, OP, envision it would finance itself.

Specifically: hosting, web design, keeping the dictionary up to date (new words, linguistic shift, new entomological research etc).

Please, elaborate. Until then you’re a choosing beggar.

Moof_Kenubi,

probably something like this

where_am_i,

And, how much did OP donate to wikimedia foundation last year?

beatensoup,

Here is an alternative that aggregates from multiple sources: www.thefreedictionary.com

While I do not oppose paying for definitions, there is someone confusing about collectively generated meaning being aggregated and packaged by one company for profit. A publicly maintained dictionary is a much much better alternative. I guarantee it would be more versatile and rigorous than this Oxford stuff.

Hawke,

one company

It’s a good thing there are lots of other dictionaries than the OED then.

hellfire103,
@hellfire103@sopuli.xyz avatar

If you’re after an online dictionary, I personally like Wiktionary.

grue,

Yep, only copyleft services (of which Wiktionary is one) can be trusted not to be paywalled or otherwise subverted in the long run.

mateomaui, (edited )

$29.95 a month? ok. The $100 a year is… better I guess.

Surprised Wikipedia hasn’t put something like this is place yet. Maybe their end-year donations push brings in enough to hold it off.

stoly,

The OED is like 150 years old with literally thousands of people scouring every possible source of English for any possible permutation of every word ever. It’s a reference for specialists, not public consumption.

mateomaui,

Yet every unusual entry I thought to look up says this:

https://i.imgur.com/H96wg7K.jpg

Some aren’t even that complicated or lengthy to define. As a specialist who would possibly use it, not terribly impressed.

stoly,

Shockingly, the use of the word “the” might not be all that interesting. That’s not the point, the goal is to document all possible uses and that is laudable.

mateomaui, (edited )

every unusual entry

From that you somehow ended up at “the”…

That is possibly the dumbest reply you could have come up with. I commend you.

stoly,

Gotcha, you were never arguing in good faith.

mateomaui,

I was wrong, you did come up with an even dumber reply.

For the sake of argument, I looked up the word “the”:

www.oed.com/dictionary/the_adj?tab=factsheet#1877…

It doesn’t contain that message I referred to.

stoly,

Yep, you get a block. Have a nice day.

mateomaui,

Dumb shit blocks me, oh no, anyway.

TheGrandNagus,

You can still buy the book or access the site via most libraries.

I get that it’s a bit annoying, but I’m guessing you’d also be annoyed about an ad-ridden, data-harvesting dictionary.

The Oxford English Dictionary is without a doubt the most well-researched, comprehensive, and linguistically complete English dictionary on Earth, bar none. Nothing even comes close to its depth and scope.

It perhaps is the most well-researched and comprehensive dictionary of all languages, but I wouldn’t know.

It’s laid out in an unusual way and even has words and alternate meanings that haven’t been used for centuries. It’s not meant to be a general-purpose dictionary, it’s niche and predominantly for linguistic experts or people fascinated by language.

An unbelievable amount of research goes into it, and those people deserve to be paid.

There are dozens of freely-available general-purpose dictionaries out there if you want them.

NevermindNoMind,

I was annoyed, like the OP, then I read your comment and now I’m impressed and have an urge to buy a copy of OED I most certainly will never open. They owe you a commission on my sale.

stoly,

A copy will literally fill a shelf. It comes in volumes with addenda releases periodically.

OhNoMoreLemmy,

I don’t think you can buy the book. It was 20 volumes in 1989, and they’ve been working on an ongoing update since then. There’s no plans to physically print a third edition.

But yeah, it’s a serious scholarly resource, and they do put out free small dictionaries as well.

www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

TheGrandNagus,

You are right, it’s wayyy too large to fit in one book, I misspoke when I said book

I had no idea they don’t want to make physical copies anymore, though, part of me is sad about that, although I can certainly appreciate why they’d go in that direction.

chriscrutch,

You can still buy it in print. It’s $1215. …oup.com/…/the-oxford-english-dictionary-97801986…

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • cisconetworking
  • rosin
  • cubers
  • megavids
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines