davidho, 8 months ago This is fine.
This is fine.
maxoakland, 8 months ago @davidho no it’s not (I know you’re joking though)
@davidho no it’s not (I know you’re joking though)
formidableinc, 8 months ago @davidho Well... i don't understand. There are 3 different date :-/ So the mean temp is the mean temp between 91/2020 ? and the graph shows the "anomaly" that's why it's negative before (roughly) 2000 ? And why "from sep 01 to sep 30" \o/ ?
@davidho Well... i don't understand. There are 3 different date :-/
So the mean temp is the mean temp between 91/2020 ? and the graph shows the "anomaly" that's why it's negative before (roughly) 2000 ?
And why "from sep 01 to sep 30" \o/ ?
disco3000, 8 months ago @davidho no its not. 🫤
@davidho no its not. 🫤
qwerty_ad, 8 months ago @davidho @climatechange
@davidho @climatechange
esklarski, 8 months ago @davidho yes, fine... video/mp4
@davidho yes, fine...
video/mp4
noplasticshower, 8 months ago @davidho everything is fine #climatechange
@davidho everything is fine #climatechange
prairiedog, 8 months ago @davidho It's even worse than first appears. Note that instead of using 1850 as the zero baseline, it shows as -1.00 compared to 1991-2000. We are nearly 2C above the 1850 baseline.
@davidho It's even worse than first appears. Note that instead of using 1850 as the zero baseline, it shows as -1.00 compared to 1991-2000. We are nearly 2C above the 1850 baseline.
GNUmatic, 8 months ago German @davidho So 1.5°C target early achievement unlocked? What's up next? 3°C as our new "goal"? 🤔🧐
@davidho So 1.5°C target early achievement unlocked? What's up next? 3°C as our new "goal"? 🤔🧐
jcmortreux, 8 months ago French @davidho wow that seems completely f***ing insane! Really wish there was coverage of the significance of this kind of change.
@davidho wow that seems completely f***ing insane! Really wish there was coverage of the significance of this kind of change.
Add comment