pecker admitting to a crime does not prove that Trump commited the crime.
The defense asked for (and got) an instruction to the jury that Trump's guilt cannot be presumed from fines AMI paid.
If Trump reimbursed, I'm suggesting that Pecker shouldn't have had to pay fines.
We have no idea what deal the prosecution made. Was there another crime Pecker didn't want to talk about, so he copped to this one to make them happy? We don't know so it's off limits.