petersuber, (edited )
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

This article advocating the abolition of would be more interesting if it fixed a few problems.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096522992300047X

It says w/o evidence that "most" APC-based journals are .

It says incorrectly that US law bars scholars at some public unis from transferring copyrights to publishers. (Nearest thing: work by govt employees is uncopyrightable.)

It's aware of APC waivers but not no-APC OA journals (), their numbers, & the many initiatives to foster them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • megavids
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines