GeekFTW,
GeekFTW avatar

And shit like this is why I'm a data hoarder lol

StillPaisleyCat,
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

The back half of Prodigy season one hasn’t even been released to DVD, just the first 10 episodes.

CIWS-30,

Yep. I used to think that I didn't need to download and back up stuff because "I just need to pop on over to Youtube or something and it'll be there!" only to find out the hard way that people delist and take down stuff from places all the time, including major corporations.

I wish I'd downloaded and backed up some of my favorite stuff back in the day. Whether it's videos, music, games... it's surprising how much crap gets taken down. I never thought that people who insisted on having physical copies were weird (unlike some others) but now I realize even more nowadays that they were right. Especially if they use those physical copies to make their own digital backups.

ValueSubtracted, (edited )
@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

Confirmed by Deadline, with some added details:

The new season will complete post-production, and the studio will be looking for a new home for Star Trek: Prodigy as season one comes off the service shortly.

The company said that “continues to be invested in growing the Star Trek franchise” with series including Star Trek: Starfleet Academy, movie event Star Trek: Section 31, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, which returned for its second season June 15 and has been renewed for a third season, animated series Star Trek: Lower Decks, which will return for its fourth season later this year and has also been renewed for a fifth season, the upcoming final season of Star Trek: Discovery as well as Star Trek: Picard.

Update from series writer Aaron J. Waltke:

Obviously, there is not much I can say. Everyone on the cast and crew loves deeply.

I have noticed some misleading headlines, so all I can do is point to this particular part of the press release.

We are completing season two on schedule and seeking a new home!

Variety's report contains this:

According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, although the show had aired on Nickelodeon in addition to Paramount+, it will not be returning to Nickelodeon either. Those on the show will complete post-production on Season 2 and then CBS Studios will be free to shop it to other outlets.

Nmyownworld,

For goodness sake. Paramount+ just gained "The spot for all Star Trek films and series" earlier this month. Now, they have to put an asterisk on that statement, "*except Prodigy."

thegdthadman,
@thegdthadman@mstdn.games avatar

@Nmyownworld @ValueSubtracted What I struggle to understand is how they don't immediately see how this will only undermine subscriber confidence

ValueSubtracted,
@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

It's the hot new trend - Warner and Disney have each done the same thing.

NuPNuA,

I mean, kind of, Disney hasn't burnt any Marvel if Stat Wars shows.

Continuumguy,

Disney did pull a few things Marvel, but they weren't prime MCU. They were all documentaries, time-sensitive hype pieces, or shows of dubious canonicity to the MCU.

ValueSubtracted, (edited )
@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

They've pulled a lot of other stuff, including Marvel's Runaways, which you may or may not count as a "Marvel show".

NuPNuA,

Point taken, but I don't feel like a long dead show that was dropped from canon almost as soon as it aired is the equivalent of a currently in production canon Trek show.

StillPaisleyCat,
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

So depressing.

Especially when Paramount+ has very little in the animated originals category.

More, Paramount has been trying to cover all of the demographics with their consolidated streamer. Compared to most of the others, excepting Disney, they have a decent amount of kids’ content and viewership. So, how shortsighted do they have to be to cut off their one major franchise offering for that demographic?

exohuman,
exohuman avatar

I get cancelling it but why remove it?

BobKerman3999,

I guess to stop paying creators

BananaTrifleViolin,

Yeah this seems likely; they've supposedly cancelled the show as part of a content write-down (a bit like Discovery-Warner did, dumping shows, writing them off in their financial statments and not broadcasting them). It sounds like the shows makers have the rights to shop it around, and given season 2 is nearly complete it'll probably end up somewhere. Seems doubtful there would be a season 3 though.

JWBananas,
JWBananas avatar

This. It's the new trend in streaming: Get better ROI for funding new content instead of paying residuals on your back catalog. The market is heading in a direction where subscribers won't just stick around forever if you're not constantly feeding them something new. So it makes more sense to put the money there instead.

"Max" has already dropped a lot of original content for this exact reason. And you can expect to continue seeing this trend across the streaming industry.

Remember the ongoing writers' strike? The pittance that they get paid in residuals from streaming is one of their main complaints. So you can expect the practice to accelerate after the strike is over.

The content will be shopped around to other platforms. You can probably expect some of it to end up on freemium/advertisement-based streaming services. The rest will just go into the proverbial vault.

Continuumguy, (edited )

The content will be shopped around to other platforms. You can probably expect some of it to end up on freemium/advertisement-based streaming services. The rest will just go into the proverbial vault.

What's weird is that Paramount HAS perhaps the best Freemium service: Pluto TV. One has to wonder if perhaps that is where Prodigy will end up (it may seem strange for a company to totally remove it from one streaming platform and move it to another that they also own, but the legalities of streaming rights are WEIRD. For example, some of the Looney Tunes shorts were removed from Max but can still be found on other WB/Discovery platforms, like their YouTube channel and the Boomerang streaming service- ultimately it was just an accounting trick)

UESPA_Sputnik,
@UESPA_Sputnik@lemmy.world avatar

Can someone please ELI5 this? If it's streamed on another service (which apparently it will), then wouldn't the creators have to be paid too? How does this all relate?

bizzle,
@bizzle@lemmy.world avatar

Paramount doesn't have to pay them, whoever picks it up does.

QHC,
QHC avatar

They are trying to find a new distributor for the second season, presumably the first would be packaged with that deal.

CeruleanRuin,

You'd think removing it would come after finding a new distributor, but I guess they don't want to give any possible advantage to a competitor.

This anti-competitive crap is rotting the whole industry.

Lockely, (edited )
@Lockely@pawb.social avatar

Paramount dumping $500 million a year into Yellowstone and 1923 but they cut the two Emmy winning Trek shows that cost a literal fraction of the price.

Nmyownworld,

I'm very surprised. I thought Prodigy had a strong following. What a strange situation, quickly pulling season one. But I don't understand the ins and outs of streaming contracts.

CeruleanRuin,

Possibly that Paramount+ simply doesn't have the kids' content to support viewership for a single show. Sure, it pulls in Trek fans, but probably isn't grabbing the 4-12 demographic it's aimed at or whatever.

lxskllr,
@lxskllr@mastodon.world avatar

@Coliver

I don't follow the TV biz closely. What exactly does this mean? Is it no more Prodigy for sure, or is it being shopped around for someone to maybe continue it?

jdc_nm,

In many cases like this they end up selling rights to one of the growing ad-supported streaming services, which means I personally will never watch. I had just started watching Prodigy in the gap between Picard and SNW. I think companies are being shortsighted in cutting back their catalogs in this way since it encourages people like me to cancel subscriptions between the initial broadcast of new seasons of the more popular series rather than stick around for something of perhaps secondary interest.

gk99,

It also means that after a while people figure out the pattern of "new show, cancelled, new show, cancelled, repeat" and stop caring about originals. Like Netflix.

emmanuel,
@emmanuel@startrek.website avatar

Maybe it's to sell it to a streamer more kid-friendly than Paramount+? I may be too naïve.

StillPaisleyCat,
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

The only streamer that’s more kid-friendly is Disney+. Netflix is trying hard to boost its original kids content through.

felixxx999,

Itunes has all of S1 for 9.99 today. I’m buying in support of the show.

chronicledmonocle,

Was it that poorly received? I thought it was great for a kid show.

marlowe,

@chronicledmonocle

@Coliver

It was a great kid's show AND great star trek.
It was well received.

there is no good reason for doing this.

StillPaisleyCat,
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

Nickelodeon didn’t get as much linear audience as they’d hoped, but Nickelodeon is doing poorly overall since 2020.

On Paramount+, it was popular but didn’t have as high a completion stat as it should.

Too many fans watched and episode or two and then bailed because it starts out looking more like other franchises that kids and families unfamiliar with Star Trek would find initially appealing. Within a very few episodes it really brings you into a very Star Trek experience, but too large a proportion of viewers didn’t give it the chance it deserves.

Also, Paramount’s promotion and timing of merchandise releases was incredibly weak. The algorithm didn’t promote the show to kids. The toys came out a year after the show premiered. The full year break between short seasons lost audience etc.

shirro,

Had a kid that loved it and he generally refuses to watch any trek show. Cutting off that audience is going to cost them in the long run but I don't think the owners of the IP have a long term vision

candyman337,
@candyman337@lemmy.world avatar

it's already a thing for several shows. The worst off are game shows that aren't as popular. or series that only had a couple of seasons. Capitalism and it's continuous churn of removing and adding new is going to put us in a new dark ages.

It's happening with everything. A friend of mine got a bike secondhand that only came with a digital manual. He didn't get the manual when he got his bike, so he had to go on the site to get it. Except the site had deleted the page his big was on, and the manual for it. It wasn't on the way back machine either. Luckily he found a similar model ok the way back machine but this is going to continue to happen.

So many things are going to be lost because they aren't printed and then they're deleted and no one is backing them up. All those news papers from local towns that we're using to piece together certain events in history just won't exist in 50 to 70 years because they were 100% digital and are now gone.

It's really upsetting and no one is doing anything about it. At least not at every level, sure there are efforts, but not in every small town.

astroturds,

Awww nooo! Not murf! I loved that little dude.

This is a shame, but maybe it means more money available to make star trek legacy? Also Kate Mulgrew is now free and can play a part in that series. Probably wishful thinking.

Newby,
@Newby@startrek.website avatar

Not enjoying this new trend of removing content. Hopefully will be available to purchase.

yarr,

anyone that torrented it still has a copy 😜

Newby,
@Newby@startrek.website avatar

I try to support the content I love. Not commenting on others actions but I do not sail the high seas. But I do think that modern content ownership is grey and we are going to be getting into issues where content is not available anywhere legally.

yarr,

modern content ownership is grey

It’s worse than grey. It doesn’t exist unless you hold physical media in your hand.

Rentlar,

Supporting content is noble and I do commend you for your intentions.

Yet, I can’t shake the feeling that supporting streaming services is more of an encouragement for the companies to wave cool creations in front of you then immediately snatch it away again.

Newby,
@Newby@startrek.website avatar

You can support it by buying physical or digital copies as well.

By the same token you can not support business practices. When my term is up I will cancel p+ and just buy the shows i want to watch instead.

kargarocP4,

code for "Prodigy is about to become super hot on pirate sites"

CeruleanRuin,

Canceling it is one thing. Pulling the show down from the service is absolutely abhorrent behavior.

aufsichtsrat,

Fully agree. There is absolutely no reason to do so!

cyd,

To avoid paying royalties, I imagine. Hollywood accounting is craaaaazy.

briongloid,
@briongloid@aussie.zone avatar

The removal from the service thing is the most absurd part of these announcements, that was the benefit of VOD, that we could access what we wanted.

Shows have gotten cancelled when they are popular and on a cliff-hanger throughout the last 60 years, but the removal thing is new and a massive decline from the accessibility improvements that were made over the last 15 years.

Fortunately for me, my personal server doesn’t have this issue.

interolivary,
@interolivary@beehaw.org avatar

Don't streaming platforms remove canceled shows so they don't have to pay residuals to actors (or whoever is contractually getting them)? I've understood that streaming residuals are pretty shit to begin with

CeruleanRuin,

Yep. It's corporate greed, plain and simple, and it's disgusting.

CeruleanRuin,

It also makes it impossible for a show to get later word of mouth bumps. Nobody sees it, new users don't even know it exists, and so it has no metrics and no future whatsoever.

briongloid,
@briongloid@aussie.zone avatar

That’s how Star Trek succeeded after The Original Series, but now there is no physical media comparable to streaming.

You would think that the content would still be licensed by another streamer like Tubi etc, but then they have to factor their property only being available on a competitor.

It’s never been a better time to selfhost.

SSH_2023,

Did it end on a cliffhanger and this means the ending is unresolved?

CNash85,

Sort of - the mystery of what happened to Chakotay is unresolved, but the crew got a more-or-less happy ending. From how it's being reported, season 2 is all but complete and they just need to find a new network or service to show it - I'd wager Prime Video might be a possible home for it as they've historically had distibution rights for the various other modern Trek shows internationally.

CeruleanRuin,

This gives some hope at least. This show is better than it had any right to be and deserves a proper ending.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • startrek@startrek.website
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines