Some people have a problem that upvotes and likes even exist. And I would go further.

SharkAttak, 1 month ago

Brought to us by Shat GPT.

Septimaeus, 1 month ago

It is an interesting concept, and we have the technology in its nascent form. However the “filter” people develop for social interaction is too essential for the individual and society in their current form, to bypass with technology across the board. Sentiment analysis certainly has utility, and I’m not concerned about its use in controlled environments with consent of all parties, but human socialization as it exists today depends on, and is informed by, the selective intimation of private emotions.

What this proposal means to address is, I suspect, the bandwidth restriction of that selective process — i.e., considering human communication as akin to interfaces of nodes in a network, would it not be far more efficient if everyone knew exactly how others felt about things all the time? The trouble is that the bandwidth restriction between nodes regulates propagation of data in the network intelligently. It is governed by the nodes themselves to, ultimately, avoid unnecessary loss of nodes or network density. Removing that governor using technology results in far fewer nodes, each of which have far fewer connections on average.

That is, it destroys society.

knightly, 1 month ago

Gross. Can we not have “AI” spam here please?

lemonflavoured, 1 month ago

Thank you, Elon Musk.

owen, 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago)

Yeeeeaahhh I ain’t getting no goddamn chip in my brain