MataVatnik,
@MataVatnik@lemmy.world avatar

Aren’t these the people that straight up manipulated data to make AMD look worse than Intel or something wild?

HarkMahlberg,
HarkMahlberg avatar

Yeah that's the guy. Hilarious to see he thinks his garbage biased opinion is worth any amount of money.

TheGrandNagus,

Yup. They’ve always done it, both on the CPU and GPU side, but especially on the CPU side.

BURN,

This is a net win. Now they won’t be recommended to everyone trying to do hardware comparisons. The bias in their results has pretty much made them worthless as a source since Ryzen released.

IronKrill,

Unfortunately the subscription appears to be for their benchmarking tool only, not for website access.

Buddahriffic,

Ah that’s funny. Anyways, time to go back to forgetting that site is a thing.

merthyr1831,

10 dollars a month to be told AMD is behind its competition based on vibes

systemglitch,

It still works the same for me. This will likely be a non-issue for most people with how it is set up.

captain_aggravated,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

Hey finally some good news.

yamanii,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

Uh, I used it two times in the past, am shocked reading the replies here lol, where can I compare two cpus then?

mods_are_assholes,

passmark.com

mudeth,

I default to nanoreview when I do a Google search. It’s pretty comprehensive and easy to scan.

AMDIsOurLord,

Go watch tech channels on YT, there are many great channels. Gamer’s Nexus also has a website (completely ad free too) that has all of their benchmark results.

Also, Phoronix although it is Unix centric

ICastFist,
@ICastFist@programming.dev avatar

Go watch tech channels on YT

Having to sift through who knows how many videos to get information that could be a graphic with numbers? Yeah, no, thanks.

I find this site useful, it’s part of Passmark - www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php

AMDIsOurLord,

YouTube has a search function you know

Just search GN channel for the part you want to buy

It’s much better than a narrow benchmark like PassMark and they show actual real world performance

ICastFist,
@ICastFist@programming.dev avatar

If I want to compare part X with 3 others, I’ll have to “watch” 4 videos. Give me the benchmark of each, plus the high/avg/low fps for a number of games and their settings, something Ars Technica does, and it’ll take me less time to compare than it’ll take to find the videos I “need” to watch.

AMDIsOurLord,

… The videos have comparison charts, have you actually never watched one

And Ars is also a very good source

bhamlin,

And nothing of value was lost…

johannesvanderwhales,

It was kind of shitty but it was also useful for making sure that you didn’t have some sort of configuration error that was negatively affecting performance. I’m sure they’ll be replaced by something else though.

inclementimmigrant,

Oh no! I won’t be able to see crappy biased comparisons and benchmarks…

GladiusB,
@GladiusB@lemmy.world avatar

That don’t actually work. My system can tell what memory I have, but you can’t? Fuck that website

aidan,

My system can tell what memory I have, but you can’t?

Wait, I’m confused about this. Are you upset the site can’t tell what RAM you have. Because I’m pretty certain there is no way a site could tell that.

GladiusB,
@GladiusB@lemmy.world avatar

You give it permissions to scan. It can tell what processor, MB, and GPU I have. But not memory? Or can’t clock the speed? It’s a crap matrix to measure your computer’s performance and useless. It’s just an elitist score board. A working rig is good enough. We all want the next big thing.

aidan,

I mean it just depends what the browser reports developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/…/deviceMemory

KairuByte,
@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

No. Wait. Stop.

Veneroso,
Faceman2K23,
@Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Ah, yes, the guy that obviously put a lot of money into intel shares or attempting to short AMD right around the launch of Zen architecture and got so butthurt about his poor investment that he started actively falsifying data and writing ridiculous unhinged reviews of amd products to make intel look better.

casmael,

Right so clearly userbenchmark is trash, but where could one, hypothetically, go, to, hypothetically, compare the performance of various cpus, hypothetically?

iliketurtles,

I like nanoreview nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare

Static_Rocket,
@Static_Rocket@lemmy.world avatar

openbenchmarking.org

ryannathans,

Passmark’s site isn’t too bad either, cpubenchmark.net

aBundleOfFerrets,

The phoronix testing site can be alright, if a little haphazard and spotty

frazorth,

Phoronix is excellent in that not only does it document all of the testing procedures, they provide instructions on how to replicate everything, and using the Phoronix Test Suite allows you to replicate all the tests locally.

It’s much more comprehensive than most of the other sites.

aBundleOfFerrets,

I don’t mean actual phoronix articles, I mean their user score aggregator thing that is a little hard to understand

frazorth,

Yes, their scoring tool. Which is dead simple to use and explains the rest set up so it can be replicated.

Aatube, (edited )
Aatube avatar

The fee is only for their benchmarking software, whose results get uploaded to the website.

only a limited unspecified number of users can test for free at any one time, and if no slots are open, then only subscribers to the $10-per-year Pro plan can test

When there are free slots, users will have to complete a 3D captcha minigame where the goal is to shoot down 13 ships. The minigame isn’t particularly difficult on the surface, but it can get very tedious as there are very few opportunities for users to actually shoot down any ships. We attempted to complete the captcha ourselves but gave up after a few minutes

IronKrill,

It’s crazy I had to scroll down this far to see a comment from someone that actually read the article.

BigDanishGuy,

You guys read the articles? I just read the comments. Scrolling to here I’ve learned that:

  1. The founder of userbenchmark apparently started the site to allegedly manipulate stocks. Specifically Intel and AMD stocks.
  2. There’s other sites than my goto sites from passmark.
  3. Some lemmings actually read the articles abd
  4. The website isn’t really getting paywalled.
Aatube,
Aatube avatar

lemmings

Look again 😏

JohnEdwa,

…why the fuck does a program running a benchmark on my PC need a “free slot” to function?

Aatube,
Aatube avatar

My guess is uploading slots

Aatube,
Aatube avatar

The ship minigame actually isn't too hard. You do have to realize that the side panels are radars. However, it requires at least 15 minutes of time at first sight, just for a benchmark?

Rentlar,

Once we reach the second threshold, to confirm you’re not a bot and submit a benchmark you need to beat Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy.

Once we reach the third threshold, to confirm you are a sadistic gamer and submit a benchmark, you need to play through all 326 paths of Shadow The Hedgehog on an online GameCube emulator in this window.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • PowerRangers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • Youngstown
  • InstantRegret
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • tsrsr
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • modclub
  • tester
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • All magazines