YSK alternatives to imgur for uploading your images

Imgur now blocks several VPNs and have issues loading embedded previews in several fediverse platforms. So instead of using imgur, you could use one of the following alternatives for uploading your images.

https://postimages.org/
https://imgbox.com/
https://imgbb.com/
https://www.imagebam.com/

Darren,

Do any of these have the ability to link an album? I often put multiple photos together, and post the that link to my communities.

Mewtwo, (edited )
@Mewtwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I just created a Catbox account since everyone in this thread has been mentioning it. It allows me to create an album after uploading images to my account and I can add a description. But I can’t customize the order the album lists the pictures or place a description on specific pictures.

I just did this

catbox.moe/c/rk6abk

Edit: for some reason it’s acting like the link a a lemmy instance? It works if I paste it in my browser… Edit 2: okay thunder app and connect app consider the /c/a Lemmy page, while Voyager has no issue

PierreKanazawa,
@PierreKanazawa@fedia.io avatar

okay thunder app and connect app consider the /c/a Lemmy page

Oops. I always wonder how to recognise federated services as domain names do not say much. How does Voyager avoid that issue?

LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

Postimages support that. They will give a gallery link if you upload multiple files together. If you have a free account, then you can add or remove images from the galleries later as well.

Here is a gallery I made just now https://postimg.cc/gallery/pzt46sv

Paradox,
@Paradox@lemdro.id avatar
Trebach,

Before anyone mentions 0x0.st or ttm.sh as alternatives, both of them will delete your files within a year of being uploaded so do not use them for anything permanent.

loansindi,
LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

Looks like they are a paid service. But still cool.

hiyaaaaa23,

Is pixelfed a good option for this sort of stuff?

Whirlybird,

Do any of them have an iOS app?

melroy,
@melroy@kbin.melroy.org avatar

You can just use fediverse (eg. kbin) to upload your image directly, without any of those instances?

CurlyWurlies4All,

You could also use Pixelfed

melroy,
@melroy@kbin.melroy.org avatar

Correct! Shout out to @dansup, who created Pixelfed. Which is a wonderful piece of software.

@CurlyWurlies4All @LollerCorleone

Kolanaki,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

Doesn’t work for animated things.

Th4tGuyII,
Th4tGuyII avatar

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. The individual hosts of the Fediverse are limited on space, and jamming that limited space full of images, rather than using an external image hosting service, is worse for the sustainability of these spaces

elbarto777,

Shouldn’t this be a per instance policy? Why would the onus be on the poster?

LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

Because pretty much all instances are being run by volunteers and hobbyists, and not a for-profit who is profiting from your content. This is just something nice to do for reducing the resources they require to run the service.

elbarto777,

I understand that. You and I are decent human beings, but a lot of people are dicks. So the instance owners should be the ones active at protecting their resources.

Sl00k,

Someone somewhere has to host the image. Realistically it should be the same people hosting the instance so you don’t run into cases where historical posts have all their images dropped. In an absolute ideal world everyone selfhosts their own images, but that’s an absolute fantasy.

aleph,
@aleph@lemm.ee avatar

In addition, help out your instance admins by resizing the image if you don’t need it in high resolution.

Uploading a 250Kb file rather than a 2.5MB one makes a difference when thousands of users are doing it.

melroy,
@melroy@kbin.melroy.org avatar

@aleph As an instance admin myself, we are looking into fine-tuning those settings to limit uploads of an x amount in file size. But are we are looking into some thumbnail library to reduce the image sizes indeed.

Deebster,

Saving images as webp gives massive savings, and I think everyone can view them nowadays.

genoxidedev1,
genoxidedev1 avatar

Uploading directly uses server resources which are voluntarily provided, that's why using external providers and just posting links instead is usually better.

fireweed,

Related: What are the best options for gifv and other short videos?

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar
LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

They look good. Large size limit of 200 mb and NSFW-friendly. But unfortunately, according to their FAQ, they are blocked in Australia, UK, Ireland, Iran and Afghanistan (the latter two are not surprising though).

Pamasich,
Pamasich avatar

they are blocked in Australia, UK, Ireland, Iran and Afghanistan

Seems to be blocked for a friend from the philippines too iirc. Combined with other replies saying they can access it from some of these, I assume that list is outdated.

Lunaere,

Website works for me here in the Philippines.

MalachiAzrael,

Weird, I am in the uk and can use catbox no problem

Whirlybird,

Same here in Australia. Might only be a select few smaller ISPs that have blocked it, ie the ones the government can bully easily.

vicfic,

It’s seems like it’s only a dns level block, so changing to non-isp dns might help you bypass that restriction.

beanz,

Also in Aus here, using ISP DNS, not blocked. I think what you generally find is that most ISP’s just don’t do the DNS blocks, even if they’re required to. Like you said, it’s very easily circumvented and also it just doesn’t lead to any measurable outcome other than the ISP customer’s dissatisfaction in some cases. It’s probably more profitable to retain the customers and deal with whatever regulatory blowback.

buxtonwater,

Not blocked in the UK here for me. Sounds like an ISP specific thing.

ZephyrXero,

Files from Catbox seem to always be slow to load for me

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

They are a lot smaller than something like Imgur some they probably don’t have worldwide CDN to distribute images, so it will probably depend on the location where you are, but their offering of public API defintely outweights any possible slowdowns for me.

djflusso,

Any thoughts about uploading images straight to lemmy.world vs using these sites to host? Is either option vulnerable to takedowns?

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

Lemmy instances have quite small size limits compared to other services. And all of them are vulnerable to DMCA takedowns as they have to comply with the laws of the host country, but unless you plan on hosting CSAM you are good with either choice.

But all have a good track record for keeping images online without deleting.

crystal,

Aren’t other file/image hosts just as vulnerable to DMCA takedowns? I mean, they have to comply with their host country’s law, too.

BrikoX,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

In theory, yes. In practice, no. E.g. Russia is known to ignore DMCA takedown requests and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

degrix,

One downside is that images uploaded to lemmy.world are hosted on lemmy.world. If the instance ever goes down those images are gone since federation does not propagate the files. This is less of an issue for that specific instance, but I could see smaller instances disappearing and causing issues with broken image links.

LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

Images could eat up the server resources of your instance. Using a third-party service reduces the burden on them.

Anything that you don't host yourself are vulnerable to takedowns. But as someone who has been using postimages.org for many years now, I have never had any such issue with them, and haven't heard of anyone else facing them as well. The other three services I linked also have a good reputation as reliable services.

HKayn,
@HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

A downside to hosting images externally is that these image hosts can go down before the Lemmy instance does, leaving many posts without context. One should keep this in mind when choosing where to upload their images.

Wander,
@Wander@yiffit.net avatar

As an instance admin I gladly host user files.

One thing to take into account is that images posted by an instanceA user on an instanceB community will still be hosted on instance A.

So as long as an instance doesn’t host more users than it can handle it should be fine.

kobra,
Dystopia,

From what I understand reading this thread, if instanceA goes down, any images hosted there are lost, while the comments will still exist because they’re federated. You’re only shifting the responsibility of hosting the image from a site like imgur to the home instance of the poster.

I guess it comes down to if you’re concerned about how long your home instance is going to be around for, use an external host, or see if/when account migrations are added if images move too (although they would also have to fix the src for wherever the image is now being hosted)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • youshouldknow@lemmy.world
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines