jarkko, to rust
@jarkko@social.kernel.org avatar

I think there would be still space for systems programming language with a constraint from day zero that it would 1:1 compatible with plain C”s binary layout and memory model:

  1. Roughly just .text, .bss, .rodata and ,data.
  2. No symbol mangling at all.

All the memory safety etc. fancy features would be then designed within exactly those constraints.

is essentially a derivative of C++ when compiled to binary, which does not really make it a strong competitor for plain #C. It can substitute C in many cases for sure, just like C++ did, but there’s always need for minimal systems programming language, which also looks elegant in binary, not just in source code.

A compiled C program can be quite easily understood with a binary with no debug symbols at all if you understand the CPU architecture well enough. That is, and will be a strong asset for C.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • love
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • tester
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines