markhughes, to privacy
@markhughes@mastodon.social avatar

now mouthing 's one-sided and spurious labelling of anyone seeking to preserve their privacy as avoiding scrutiny rather than trying to maintain their human right to .

dangillmor, to random
@dangillmor@mastodon.social avatar

Has the Guardian stopped letting readers post comments on articles?

markhughes,
@markhughes@mastodon.social avatar

@dangillmor I wonder if this is another impact of the oppressive UK .

Regardless, we are going to see a lot more instances of business and individuals shutting down services that allow public posting, which of course includes any UK based and even UK facing Mastodon servers.

recently published its proposals for implementation, for consultation. They are >1,500 pages long.

How can anyone but a corporation understand let alone comply. It'll be a clusterfuck, as warned.

happyborg, to random
@happyborg@fosstodon.org avatar

Dear @neil

You've now had a week since you wrote in horror about the 1,500 page consultation on the UK , in your blog: https://decoded.legal/blog/2023/11/ofcoms-%3E1500-page-consultation-on-the-online-safety-act-2023-and-why-small-companies-dont-have-a-chance/

Having had time to digest this 🤣 I wonder if there's any light you can shed on what would allow a no-server/no-owner Mastodon like service to operate without being affected by the Act. I'm wondering how to build a p2p protocol to avoid being in scope, but don't know the catch criteria, where the lines are, exceptions etc. 🤷‍♂️

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines