Here’s my latest post on #AllThingsTech talking about #EpicGames and their new store and asking questions about how the focus on regulating Big Tech will actually affect consumers
Myself and @beardedtechguy are looking for writers to write for our #AllThingsTech blog that we launched earlier this week.
If you are interested in doing some blogging about tech related stuff, please reach out to us as we'd love to talk to you and possibly bring you on-board!
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask as I'd be happy to answer any questions.
If I copy your shit as my own, that's plagiarism and it's bad.
But when I copy everyone's shit and run it through a mystery box that rearranges it until it barely makes sense, that's futuristic technology.
And if I take your shit and sell it, that's copyright violation and it's bad.
But when I make a place for people to post their shit and I just sell access to it so the mystery box people can have it, that's a viable business model.
@paulschoe@fraying I think the difference between the statements you have added and the original post are important: in order to identify a solution, we first have to identify the right problem to be solved
As a musician I was always told the best way to learn is by listening to others and AI training is no different in that sense
Objective, scale, and usage are already factors in determining fair use, which means we have some sort of legal framework to use
@paulschoe@fraying It’s understandable, and it’s precise enough to not have much of an unintended consequence
Saying that “basing the output off a set of inputs is not fair use” essentially means that, if you’ve ever seen a drawing of something, you would no longer allowed to be able to draw that thing because you would be plagiarizing
@paulschoe@fraying what I’m getting at is that the process by which an AI is trained is no different than the process a person would take
As I understood it, OP’s point was that this process (specifically the process), as done by an AI, is somehow copyright infringement
I agree with your points that intention, scale, accessibility, etc. are all important in determining fair use, but that’s not what I understood OP’s post to be saying, I interpreted it as stated above
An Ignorant Take on Vision Pro 🥽
I have been intrigued and puzzled by the Apple Vision Pro, so I thought it might be therapeutic to jot down my jostling thoughts about it all. https://basicappleguy.com/basicappleblog/itoavp