@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Dr_Cog

@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Nostalgia goggles are a thing, though. People have HD memories of what they enjoyed and some people don’t like actually facing their low-def reality.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I really don’t understand how they can so rabidly defend atrocious behavior by dictators and strongmen and then claim to be left-wing. Do they not realize these fascists they are defending are right-wing?

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Can you explain what you mean about historical race science? I’ve never heard of it.

Either way, even shitty science should be freely accessible so your point doesn’t make any sense.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Strong disagree, given the vaccine hysteria was on the part of the deniers. The science supported and continues to support the vaccines effectiveness and safety. It’s primarily people who aren’t scientists and don’t know how to interpret medical studies that are claiming that they are dangerous or ineffective.

Nice to meet you, I’m a medical scientist that specializes in Alzheimer’s research. Absolutely none of my colleagues think vaccines are dangerous.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Good. There isn’t a single scientific organization, given the whole point of science is democratizing information research.

General populace are supposed to rely on the top researchers in their field to disseminate information. These top researchers are usually the least controversial which is why they are trusted by the (again) democratized scientific community. I’ll say this because a lot of people don’t realize it: if you have any controversy in your past regarding misinformation or “fixing” results, and it ever gets out, you are immediately shunned and your work will never be looked at seriously again. You will lose your job and all credibility immediately. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, but it is heavily discouraged.

If we want to combat misinformation we should be encouraging people to trust scientists and not get information from organizations with ulterior motives.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I understand the historical context but many of us scientists strive to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Nearly every grant I apply to has a secondary version that prioritizes racially and ethnically diverse applicants. Half of articles I see published are now acknowledging the racial divide in science and striving to recruit more minority populations.

I’m applying to a federal grant now (K01) and I am required to state my strategy for ensuring representation of gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in my recruitment population. I have a section of my grant discussing how the presentation of Alzheimers differs in black communities.

We definitely have more work to do, but it’s not like we’re pretending the racial divide doesn’t exist.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Intentional racism is no longer an issue due to nearly every (reputable) publication’s requirement of a institutional review board. This is to prevent exactly what you describe.

Unintentional racism, yes I agree that’s a problem.

But come on. We’ve made huge strides in this over the past few decades.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I’m not saying trust any random person who calls themself a scientist. Myself included.

I’m saying people should trust reputable scientists at the top of their field. Ideally, journalists should do the leg work to identify these people and give them a voice, and describe why they should be trusted.

That doesn’t happen with nearly all right-leaning journalistic publications, unfortunately, resulting in a huge population not knowing who to trust or just mistrusting scientists in general.

Edit: I realize I didn’t answer your point on freedom of access. I do firmly believe all science should be accessible, because no single study should ever be taken as fact. Science works through repetition, and if you have a study that disagrees with nearly everything else then it’s either a brand new way of looking at things (and will be supported in the future) or is junk (and will be ignored). But just because something is junk doesn’t mean we should prevent people from accessing it.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

You’re very good at putting words into people’s mouths (I didn’t even mention antivax theories), and that point is where I end the conversation. Good day

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

So your response is “no, u?”

I’m happy to have this conversation but you really need to contribute more. I’ve described numerous ways we currently combat racism in science. Would you like to provide a recent example of racist science that we can discuss?

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Ah, yes. Good catch, I did mention that there is no scientific evidence to support any widespread negative effects of the vaccines, and there continues to not be. You’re more than able to put yourself in the running for the Nobel prize for saving millions of lives by finding and publishing this evidence, though, since it seems that you’re so confident in it.

I did not state that “no one credible would believe them”, and your links about slavery are irrelevant because the discussion was about vaccines, not racism.

And I didn’t lie. Literally none of my colleagues thinks there is any merit to antivax scaremongering.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Every single time someone does a report on crime and breaks down data by race you’re seeing racist social science in action

Maybe I’m misinterpreting but… is your solution to ignore race and pretend it doesn’t exist? That we should be ignorant of how different groups are being treated and pretend everyone is the same? I think we both agree that minorities in many countries are more likely to be poor and have lower social mobility, and so it’s important to study them. As an example from my field: Alzheimer’s is significantly more likely if you’re a minority, especially black or hispanic, due to their reduced ability to access healthy food (food deserts) and quality healthcare due to past redlining. The only way we know this is by studying it.

Forced hysterectomies

That’s not science, that’s horrible treatment of minority groups and medical malpractice. No scientist with any degree of repute supports that shit.

I’m unfamiliar with the others: genetics being politically correct (this statement makes no sense to me), Mauna Kea, or Guam.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Sync has a monthly fee to get rid of ads, Eternity is always ad-free

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Ok, but AI isn’t going away. So if these companies stop serving open access, the ONLY people that will use them will be the people who can afford the server/processing time.

This article isn’t about usefulness of the models to normal people. It’s about profitability of the models to the corporations that serve them.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Paying close attention is ironically very important if you’re interested in foraging

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Where do you live? Because I doubt you are the original settler of your land.

If you’re an American (North or South), you are not responsible for the reprehensible actions of your ancestors towards the Native populations just because you now live there. Similarly with Russia, China, most of Africa, Australia, Europe… basically the entirety of the world has a history of war and settling on conquered land. And you don’t deserve death for the actions of your ancestors.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I assume EU-based ISPs will be forced to ban access to the website for noncompliance, otherwise it would have literally no teeth whatsoever

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

No need to try again. They already are implementing additional costs. 2 steps forward, 1 step back.

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

Tell me more about what is being removed and why you enjoy it so much you want to keep it in

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I do the same with psychology. Except it’s worse because people think they DO know psychology when they absolutely don’t

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

And how does that make you feel?

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

You may underestimate the amount of money the Saudi government has

Dr_Cog,
@Dr_Cog@mander.xyz avatar

I don’t see a problem. For one, it’s been 15 years: the vast majority of libraries have been ported by now. And like you said, you can fix the syntax with basically a find/replace script, so any stragglers can be modified easily.

There really isn’t any excuse to still be using Python 2 anymore

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • normalnudes
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • tester
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines