MimicJar

@MimicJar@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MimicJar,

I’m not sure you can call Furiosa franchise milking.

Apart from sharing a name the 2015 film came out 30 years after the previous film and has little to actually connect them apart from the main characters name and the general theme. If it wasn’t the same director it would be just a love letter to those films instead of a reboot.

Furiosa is a prequel that came out 9 years later.

Making a film and then a follow up 9 years later is FAR from milking a franchise.

Additionally both stories are completely new and not remakes.

MimicJar,

What the fuck are you talking about.

The original director revived a 30 year old movie franchise. In doing so completely reset the story.

Call the film “Fury Road” staring “Mad Matt” and you’d be calling it a visionary new story with tasteful callbacks to 80s action films.

Then we get a prequel to the film 9 years later. In what world is that milking? A follow up to a film isn’t milking a franchise.

MimicJar,

Nope, it’s from a film Lisa and Marge watch.

MimicJar,

Accurate. Know it all. Correct.

Nuts to this you win.

MimicJar,

Born with the head of a rabbit. And the body of a rabbit.

MimicJar,

He he he, do what I say.

Correct! (And very detailed)

MimicJar,

Well Picard season 2 was something wild and season 3 was a TNG victory lap, so I’m excited to see what they come up with.

I’m bummed that it’s a 5 year gap, but hopefully things are on the right path going forward.

MimicJar,

Bart! Do you have any hobbies? Wait, what are you building?

MimicJar,

You.

You have selected you, which refers to me, the correct answer is you.

MimicJar,

You won’t.

MimicJar,

Jiminy Jillikers! Correct!

MimicJar,

Lol, I tried to gif that exact scene but it looped weird (and was too large for Lemmy).

MimicJar,

Obviously I don’t know what the details of he suit against Disney but the truth is Disney fucked up and they knew it.

Disney tried to gain a few extra bucks at the cost of a legal battle with Johansson. If Disney won it would have been a clear signal that Disney is willing to screw over top talent for a few million dollars.

Not to compare “Black Widow” to “Endgame”, but that’s squabbling over millions when billions are at stake.

Looking at someone like Johansson that’s squabbling over millions when tens of hundreds millions are at stake. Contracts with top talent now take longer, top talent is a little less likely to work with Disney.

It all but guaranteed a loss for Disney.

The settlement was Disney’s way of saying “we fucked up”, and truth be told was probably at least partially responsible for Bob Chapek being replaced as CEO.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines