@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

NicoleCRust

@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social

Professor (UPenn). Brain researcher. Author (nonfiction). Advocate for community based progress & collective intelligence.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

jonny, (edited ) to random
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

Students for divestment at #UCIrvine have taken a building and riot cops are staging

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/pro-palestinian-protesters-occupy-building-at-u-c-irvine/

edit: unclear whether riot cops have live ammo or just rubber bullets

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@jonny
Not you, right?!

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@jonny
Hugs to everyone at Irvine. + whew.

NicoleCRust, to science
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

When should one call themselves an X researcher?

There are so many different types of researchers. Weather researchers, climate researchers, brain researchers. And within those categories, the nuances (like memory researchers).

When someone says they are an X researcher, what does that imply to you? In other words, what qualifies? Does it just imply that they are curious about X? Or perhaps that they know a bit more about it - perhaps they've mastered some scholarly literature or they've done at least one experiment? Or maybe even published a paper in a peer reviewed journal? Or maybe even more - perhaps they have a body of work on the topic; maybe they even run a lab (and have grants to support X research).

On one hand, no one should gate keep curiosity! On the other, certain terms imply knowledge and qualifications. I'm a "researcher". But just because I know a lot about memory doesn't automatically mean that people should listen to me about climate or economics. And I once read a very good book about ecosystems, but I don't think that means I should quality as an ecosystem researcher. So what, then, might instead?

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@analog_ashley
Great point! The field has built things up to require some bravado to declare "Yes, I'm computational". What qualifies? Is y=mx+b enough? Does x need to be a vector? Or do you need to be able to define what a "Jacobian" is?

Some of my best computational insights have been of the form: if you and and subtract and apply a threshold, then ....

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@amras
Great points!

APBBlue, to random
@APBBlue@zirk.us avatar

I think I'm going to need reading glasses soon. ::squints::

NicoleCRust, (edited )
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@APBBlue
Solidarity. My sense there is that some of us are open to reading glasses when 14 pt font menus are a normal distance from our face whereas others of us won’t give in if there’s any arm length distance we can still read a menu. If you look around at a restaurant, the more sensible among us have glasses on. The less sensible … (just look; it’s amusing!)

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@APBBlue
Manifestion is the key!

jonny, to random
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

Just got chased out of a lab by a PI while doing a Union walkthrough. I feel bad for people in labs like that man, for your boss to be so tightly hovering over you and actively hostile to your rights as a worker must suck a lot.

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

@jonny
❤️​

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • cisconetworking
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • cubers
  • vwfavf
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines
    •