I’ve been trying to, and it would be easy enough with individual users having an @gmail account. My situation is ten people on a custom domain (anyone remember “Google apps for your domain”?) and that is particularly difficult to extricate from!
That’s YNAB4, their last desktop version that you could buy once and use forever.
After v4 they switched to the web based version with a yearly subscription. While it’s good that they continually improve it, IMHO it’s not worth it unless you use an American bank that supports automatic data import into Web YNAB.
Hey, don’t diss Fisher Price toys. The old ones from 40+ years ago were solid. So much so that the iconic telephone on wheels and with eyes is still around.
I’m with you, and we can make quite cool things in TinkerCad. To translate my question to your shape: if you decide to have larger rotors, or longer arms, you would have to fiddle with groups for a very long time, right? In comparison, with e.g. FreeCad and a shitload of parameters, that would be quick (but you’d need to spend a lot of time defining all those parameters… but only once, though).
Lofts and sweeps and pockets FTW! That does look like the right solution for single objects.
What about objects that sit at an angle relative to each other? Can you define workplanes (sketches) at arbitrary angles? Can you later slide those planes up/down, e.g. to add more distance from the face it would sit on? For instance, in the above object, the holders on the blue face are tilted 14 degrees from the blue base, and the little red holder in front is tilted an additional 5 degrees and lifted 6mm from the front of the larger red holder.