@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

imaqtpie

@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Why are people focusing on the numerical comparison between writers and billionaires? Whatever, it doesn’t really matter.

The point of the article is that writers and authors are seemingly less valued than they ever have been. One reason for this is probably the change in media consumption habits which renders writers mere employees and underlings in the film and television industries (along with everywhere else). People no longer read books, which are the main format by which writers can become self-employed and self sufficient.

As always, it comes back to the homogenizing aspect of capitalism which tends to absorb everything into an interconnected web of economic dependencies. Instead of small businesses, we have overarching retail behemoths like Walmart and Amazon. Similarly, instead of a multitude of independent writers and authors expressing their own thoughts in books, they are compelled to work in teams to construct artificial, corporatized narratives due to economic necessity, yielding film franchises and television series along with all of their advertising and merchandising income.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Eh it’s fine, everyone on the internet likes to take the opportunity to correct an argument that they think is wrong, even if just on a technicality. I don’t think the author of this piece needed to focus so much on the numerical comparison with billionaires either. If anything, they could have focused more on the historical compensation of writers to make a more compelling argument. Maybe try to find book sales and compensation from the past few centuries and see how they compare.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Unfortunately not. And even the few people who do still read books are much less likely to purchase a physical copy.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Great news, he was absolutely terrible

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Blasphemy. Rooney was a much better player than Ribery in most aspects. In his early career he was absolutely unstoppable as a winger. Then he became a number 9, then attacking midfielder, and eventually a deep lying playmaker. I just think he was a more gamebreaking and talented player, while Ribery was merely an elite winger that played his role in a dominant Bayern side.

imaqtpie, (edited )
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

What you’re saying isn’t totally crazy, but I still have to disagree. Ronaldo scored 66 goals in 2013; he was a far better player than Ribery that season and every season tbh. Zidane was also a far better player than Ribery.

Ribery was a brilliant winger who could get by his man and create chances. But it was only as effective as it was because Bayern was so dominant. Consider this, in his 12 seasons at Bayern, they only had a goal differential below +41 once, which was in 08/09 when they finished second with a +29 GD. They never averaged below 2 goals/game, reaching all the way up to 2.88 goals/game in 12/13.

Rooney was Man Utd’s top scorer as an 18 year old in 04/05, scoring 11 goals playing as a winger in an offense that only produced 1.52 goals/game. He was also the leading goalscorer in 2 of the 3 most productive offenses that Man Utd had while he was there. In 09/10 they averaged 2.26G/g and he scored 26, and in 11/12 they averaged 2.34G/g and he scored 27.

Subtracting penalties, Rooney scored 205 league goals and added 118 assists in his career, while Ribery went for 100 goals and 127 assists. Interestingly enough, they ended up with the exact same G-PK+A/90 mins in their careers, 0.65.

Probably the best evidence of what I’m saying is that Ribery’s numbers are much lower in all the seasons before and after his Bayern stint. When your team is scoring close to 3 goals per game, it’s not too difficult to ping in a few crosses per game and rack up some assists. But on a less dominant team, Ribery didn’t have the ability to take over the game by himself like Rooney was able to.

Sourcesfbref.com/en/players/f61c7c4e/Franck-Riberyfbref.com/en/players/f07be45a/Wayne-Rooney

imaqtpie, (edited )
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s a massive step up. I don’t see him lasting more than two seasons at the most. He did well with Burnley but has absolutely no experience managing a team at the level of Bayern.

His reputation as a player and experience in the Bundesliga will give him some extra credibility at first, but if they start losing games the blame will quickly fall on him due to his youth and inexperience as a manager. It’ll be especially difficult for him to fill the shoes of a manager like Tuchel, who is extremely experienced and tactically renowned.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

I think it’s unnecessary. Everything can just happen in this community imho.

Certainly looking forward to the tournament though.

imaqtpie, (edited )
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

If squids can turn transparent, why do they bother with all the colors and camouflage? Maybe it’s just because they like to show off

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar
imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Lol! Nice one

Thinking about my koala community again even though I had been feeling a bit down lately, and dealing with probably too much email (lemmy.world)

At this time, I have been feeling a bit down and is why I haven’t being doing much with the koala community I had created here. But now I’m thinking about it again and had been wondering how I would incorporate a koala comfort place into it where one could talk about concerning things that may also be worrying things. I’m...

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

It sounds like you should definitely start filtering your emails. 200/day is way too much.

You shouldn’t feel any pressure about posting more, it’s already a very nice community about koalas. But I am also looking forward to whatever you want to share in the future.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Well said. As someone who is going to vote for Biden to keep Trump out of office, I harbor no ill will towards leftists who choose to reject the whole charade. One way or another, we need to bring down the system, and I don’t see any evidence that voting for centrist democrats is likely to incrementally move us towards a better system.

On the contrary, it seems more likely to me that Trump would potentially accelerate the evolution of society by fucking everything up so badly that we would have no alternative but to make radical changes.

However, given that I am unable to be certain of the future outcome of each timeline, I believe that voting for Biden minimizes the risk of a worst case scenario. But again, I don’t approve of shaming leftists for abstaining, because the reality is that both parties are colluding to maintain the status quo, and ultimately if Trump wins the election its not the voters who will be to blame, but the Democratic party for failing to produce a credible challenger.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Thank you for sharing that; I also consider myself a radical moderate. In the context of a decadent and degenerate society, the term makes a great deal of sense.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Wow, this is so dystopian. Late stage capitalism at its finest.

Btw if you can’t get past the pay wall, add “12ft.io/” in front of the URL and it should bypass.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Oh cool. I’m using Firefox and I didn’t even realize that. Good tip 👌

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

First click the link. Then manually type 12ft.io/ in the URL bar, before the https://

I’m honestly not sure how it works because it doesn’t work when you share the link, but if you type it manually it does. Works on all sorts of sites too, but some sites have already opted out. Honestly the Firefox reader view that the other guy posted is even easier and more useful, assuming you use Firefox.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

Somebody should make a sticker out of this. I’d buy it.

imaqtpie, (edited )
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

This is a useful guide for formatting stuff on Lemmy.

Links are formatted like [text]_(link), except there is no space between the brackets and parentheses.

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/247ef15b-e949-4d07-9afe-97a29e941ad8.jpeg

Every lemmy post and comment should have this button that I circled, assuming you’re using the web interface. If you click that, it shows the actual formatting of the post or comment so you can see how it was done. Like this

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/b75682b2-df2e-45b6-90e7-5f33a269b446.jpeg

imaqtpie, (edited )
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

This is very strange, I can still see many of the posts from the community at various URLs, especially from viewing your account page. But the community itself isn’t showing any posts when you view it directly.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

round of applause

Well done sir

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

The Wee Free Men? I need to read more Terry Pratchet honestly, I remember reading that book as a kid and it was amazing.

imaqtpie,
@imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works avatar

If the inventor was known to be hubristic and reckless, it could be poetic justice. Otherwise, I think ironic is the best descriptor.

Btw, here’s a historical example of this happening.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines