@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

isaackuo

@isaackuo@spacey.space

Been around rec.arts.sf.science, BAUT (aka CosmoQuest), Google Plus, sfconsim-l, and other places ...

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

isaackuo, to random
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

Postcards from Cutty ramblings 003

Deck Prism Lighting

Cutty's ship is named RMS Essex, although "ESSEX" is just what's painted on the side. The original Essex was scrapped; its LH2 tank was converted into the crew compartment of Cutty's ship.

more here: https://diaspora.glasswings.com/posts/ae89ac70f11b013c9441448a5b29e257

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

So, LH2 tank engineering is not trivial. If you want it to launch from Earth, then you have to confront icing and insulation. For various reasons, this works best with a single layer of structural tank, with insulation foam applied outside that and optional paint outside that.

But this becomes a problem if you have dreams of using these big LH2 tanks for a space habitat. Bits of foam breaking off becomes space debris - a hazard in LEO.

1/2

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

Thus, Essex was not allowed to operate in LEO, severely limiting its ability to bring in revenue. Besides, its avionics and various systems degraded and became obsolete, so Essex was scrapped.

Cutty's ship would be built around its LH2 tank, repurposed into a crew compartment. Spraying the outside with large cellulose bubbles both solved the problem of space debris and provided Whipple shield-like impact protection.

2/2

steinarb, to random
@steinarb@mastodon.social avatar
isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@steinarb @nyrath

There's not much in common between this new concept and Daedalus. For one thing, it uses fission rather than fusion.

And the basic idea is wild ... take a gun-type fission bomb and make it so that the cylinder portion is reusable while the bullet portion gets super duper hot.

I'm no nuclear physicist, so I don't even know if that can even plausibly work.

Hcobb, to random
@Hcobb@spacey.space avatar

@nyrath What's the proper size for the hero ship in a movie, TV series or RPG?
99% of the crew of the Enterprise seem to do nothing ever, not even react to the half-human.
In the three Star Wars movies the Millennium Falcon seems more a setting for interludes rather than part of the plot. As soon as the rookie gets the keys to an X-wing he's outta there. (In diapers?)
Traveller has two types of ships, depending on the types of missions the gamers are in to. With few if any NPC crewmembers.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Hcobb @nyrath

The ideal size is not seven. Blakes 7 just couldn't ever get the hang of giving all the characters something to do.

nyrath, to random
@nyrath@spacey.space avatar

PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A HYPERVELOCITY NUCLEAR INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM (HNIS) FOR OPTIMAL DISRUPTION OF NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS

nuking incoming rogue asteroids

(pdf file)
https://www.adrc.iastate.edu/files/2012/06/AAS-12-225.pdf

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@nyrath

Page 7 "optional boom" ... Captain Ivanova does not approve.

lorenschmidt, to random
@lorenschmidt@genart.social avatar

i got the new placeholder a* road builder working and integrated into the world generator. i plan to return to the ant trail inspired approach, but i can do integration work with this just fine.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@lorenschmidt

Hmm ... the roads seem to strongly tend to be aligned with 45 degree diagonals. I feel like roads that are more orthogonal feel more "traditional".

(See, for example, Phantasie.)

masukomi, to random
@masukomi@dice.camp avatar

So, the reason I was looking at Star Wars - and other games - was because I'm questioning the whole point of "Character Advancement" in games that aren't power fantasies.

There are many games where you're just a "normal" person or "Normal+" 😉

Why do so many of those games have "advancement" or "levels" or whatever? Is it just because it's become expected? If you're not playing a Power Fantasy then why do characters just gaining power and capability at an impossible rate?

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@masukomi

I think it's really just habit, established by D&D. I mean ... D&D was ridiculously popular and it established all sorts of conventions.

Furthermore, D&D inspired a ton of CRPGs and RPG-like games (such as roguelikes). In those games, there wasn't really a capability to replicate the role playing aspects of D&D, but it was straightforward to replicate the numerical mechanics, such as leveling up.

A lot of people were introduced to RPGs via these games first, rather than tabletop.

nyrath, (edited ) to random
@nyrath@spacey.space avatar

Scifi writers should know that an army marches on their stomach. Also amateurs talk about tactics while experts talk about logistics.

You gotta feed your armies and starfleets fuel, ammo, rations for the military humans or everything comes to a screeching halt.

But I had no idea the number of different types of naval logistic ships.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Sealift_Command#Fleet_Oiler_Program_N031

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@nyrath

I kinda like the idea of taking inspiration from wooden ship days. Back then, it might not be so much a matter of different purpose built logistics ships, but rather a ship's purpose could evolve with age, as it gets worn out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulk_(ship_type)#Hulks_used_for_storage#Hulks_used_for_storage)

cstross, to random
@cstross@wandering.shop avatar

New blog entry: On mistaking a transient state for a permanent one: https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2024/05/on-mistaking-a-transient-state.html

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@cstross

What you're suggesting pretty much can't be done, in terms of orbital mechanics. In order to achieve global coverage from LEO satellites, they need to be in a bunch of different orbital planes.

(And also, in LEO it takes a lot of fuel to do orbital plane changes.)

So that means it's impossible for a Starship upper stage to pick up more than a few of them for return.

It makes more fiscal sense to just let them burn up in the atmosphere and let others pay the externalities.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@cstross

The ion thrusters on Starlink satellites definitely have better performance than typical satellite thrusters, but even so ... it takes a lot of delta-v to do plane changes in LEO.

It could take much less delta-v to move up to a graveyard orbit (where atmospheric drag is negligible).

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@cstross

They're not going to be in one graveyard orbit, but a whole bunch of different ones.

And if they're in graveyard orbits, why not just leave them there?

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@cstross

Your ethernet cables don't go obsolete in 5 years, though.

But maybe I'm misunderstanding. I thought the idea was that the Starlink satellites would need to be replaced after 10 years (or 5 years maybe) due to obsolescence. In other words, it's not about keeping them in use, just deciding what to do with them at EOL.

Is that right?

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@cstross

Okay, thanks for the explanation.

There has been, for some time, attempts at coming up with schemes to refuel satellites. So far, this hasn't led to anything successful; the orbital mechanics of the situation is pretty daunting.

But for a Starlink specific solution, it could make sense to design supply modules that a Starlink satellite rendezvous with to get more propellant and/or a new payload comms package.

No need to return stuff to Earth, just receiving supplies/upgrades.

1/2

nyrath, to random
@nyrath@spacey.space avatar

Horizontal running inside circular walls of Moon settlements: a comprehensive countermeasure for low-gravity deconditioning?

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231906

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@maxthyme @nyrath

Worth noting that this was done in space, at zero gee rather than low gee. Skylab had a circular track made of small cabinets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiMq-fdRhLo

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@KarlSchroeder @nyrath

Martian gravity is .38g, whereas lunar gravity is .17g. So, the floor angle to simulate 1g would be 22 degrees rather than 10 degrees.

So basically, it would work about the same as on the Moon, just with about twice the floor angle (not all that much different in the big scheme of things).

tkinias, to random
@tkinias@historians.social avatar

Every so often I’ll think about the U.S. defense budget (around $880bn this year), and wonder where we’d be with power technology if even one percent of that money every year had been invested in fusion research. That would fund an ITER-scale project every two to three years.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@tkinias

I can't say I'm optimistic that it would have led to any sort of fusion power, but it could have encouraged more people to go into physics knowing there was a well funded jobs program for it.

Also, it's possible we might have a spinoff technology to show for it all.

For example, the VASIMR thruster that has been going nowhere for two decades was a spinoff from MCF research.

Maybe we could also have a Z-pinch spinoff thruster and a pulsed laser thruster going nowhere for decades.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@tkinias

I think that fusion research physicists actually have a pretty realistic idea of what the money would likely result in, but they know this won't get them the funding.

So, if this money isn't wasted of fusion research, I expect it would be wasted on some other field which is 2nd best at making duplicitous promises. Maybe solar freakin roadways.

The challenge is to figure out how to design and maintain a system that can disincentivize the B.S.

nyrath, to random
@nyrath@spacey.space avatar
isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Aaron_DeVries @nyrath

There are also weird possibilities related to neutrinos, dark matter, and/or dark energy.

Hcobb, to random
@Hcobb@spacey.space avatar

The first rule of Space Vikings is that ships are faster than information.
Otherwise you're battling not raiding.

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Hcobb

Another approach was used in Legend of the Galactic Heroes - remove all resources from the frontier worlds, so the liberators have nothing to liberate (other than hungry locals).

This strategy would have been political disaster for the Democratic side, but for the Imperials the locals simply had no realistic choice but to comply.

1/2

@eldadoinquieto @nyrath @peterdrake

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Hcobb

If transport costs make it impractical to hoover all the resources from frontier worlds, an alternative is to torch the resources rather than let them be plundered.

The resources are stored with "self destruct" flame throwing and/or flooding systems. So, the raiders can't steal the resources.

Of course, if you compensate the victims when the burn system is activated, this sets up perverse incentives to game the system ...

2/2

@eldadoinquieto @nyrath @peterdrake

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Robert_Brandt

The bribe has to be significantly cheaper, because it funds the continued operations of the space horde - making it easier for them to do it again, and also incentivizing them to do so.

In contrast, military action depletes resources from the space horde and incentivizes them to do something else or go elsewhere.

Of course, it's also possible to use a bribe to buy some time, to build up a more credible deterrent. It's not a binary.

@Hcobb @eldadoinquieto @nyrath @peterdrake

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Robert_Brandt

A non-military deterrent might be possible. I mentioned the idea of threatening to burn stored resources rather than allow them to be plundered.

Various difficulties like getting local buy-in to the strategy are left as an exercise for the players.

@Hcobb @eldadoinquieto @nyrath @peterdrake

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@Hcobb

This is why you use remote detonated mini squash head warheads.

First you shoot the squishy sticky squash heads at the target. Then you designate one to detonate (it has flashing LED to indicate it's the one primed to detonate).

Then you remote command it to go boom, mitigating collateral damage.

@eldadoinquieto @Robert_Brandt @nyrath @peterdrake

isaackuo,
@isaackuo@spacey.space avatar

@nyrath

In the meantime Matt Murdoch is running around lasing everyone and everything everywhere like a madman, maniacally laughing.

@Robert_Brandt @Hcobb @eldadoinquieto @peterdrake

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • kavyap
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • vwfavf
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • All magazines