partial_accumen

@partial_accumen@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

partial_accumen, (edited )

There needs to be a way to validate if something is a truck.

Isn’t there already legal definitions such as gross vehicle weight? I know there have been some edge cases where people argue cars as trucks to get special truck access for commercial use. Chevy HHR comes to mind with some contractors.

partial_accumen, (edited )

I’m not understanding your idea. Why would it be harder for the US to replace tech talent? We’re not restricted to just hiring US nationals. The green card queue is decades long. Ask any H1-B visa holder you know their ‘priority date’ for green card consideration. They’ll be able to tell you immediately.

partial_accumen,

It looks like from your definition of “personal army” its impossible to perform any overt act or have any passive inaction and not be labeled someones “personal army”.

partial_accumen,

Do we know the number of IDF soldiers involved in total to arrive at the friendly fire casualties? Are we approaching more Israeli deaths from Friendly Fired than from Israeli citizens that were victims of Hamas in the original incursion on Oct 6th?

partial_accumen,

Man if I were a competing EV company or charging network, now would be a really good time to get some of the best talent there is.

This is one of the core problems. Besides Rivian there ARE NO other EV companies that are building their own charging network. And Rivian isn’t really doing massive rollouts of its “Adventure” charging network like Tesla is/was.

The other companies running charging networks exclusively have different motivations and approaches. None of them are swimming in money needed to build out like Tesla Supercharging was. These charging only company’s only revenue stream is charging fees, which is not really much yet because EV penetration is still fairly low.

partial_accumen,

I can’t see Justin Hammer being distracted into buying a social media company for $44 billion either.

partial_accumen,

“Whatever you did broke prod. Please join this P1 call for the duration of the weekend”

– your boss 30 minutes from now.

partial_accumen,

“Never play chess with a pigeon.

The pigeon just knocks all the pieces over.

Then shits all over the board.

Then struts around like it won.”

If it isn’t obvious, Trump is the pigeon.

partial_accumen,

Stay by the phone always. We may need you to defuse a bomb someday.

partial_accumen,

…and since the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, also simulating nuclear warhead detonation for development.

partial_accumen,

I didn’t think this “not using inner voice” thing applied to me, but the way I read the article maybe it does. If the inner voice is truly a voice using grammatical spoken language it sounds crazy limiting.

As someone with an inner voice, I can’t even imagine how I’d think about abstract concepts without words. Like, how does “I love freedom” or “I wish all people could be free” happen without words?

None of this is in words when I’m thinking about it. I’m putting words here to describe the concepts , thoughts and feelings, of each step but none of it is words when I’m thinking it.

Freedom

  • limitless choice
  • peace and comfort
  • patriotism (to the extreme, ironic terms freedom being used as a method of control)
  • anti-freedom = slavery or being controlled
  • personal experience with making free choices
  • historical learning about situations where they didn’t have freedom
  • personal luck in being born in a (mostly) free country
  • imagining being born and living in a place without freedom
  • fictional examples of lack of freedom, like sci-fi dystopia
  • empathy about those that don’t have the same things I do
  • sense of justice about equality
  • memory of muscles used to make my mouth and larynx say the word “freedom” FREEEEEE — DUUMMM

All of the above only takes a second or two of actual elapsed time.

Words that come out:

“I love freedom. I wish all people could be free”.

partial_accumen,

How fo they read silently to themselves? 🤔

The same way as listening to someone speak. There’s a thread of consciousness that takes in visual data and is translating the written word into a string of syntactical concepts that is then processed analytically.

partial_accumen,

I can even visualize things with my eyes open.

Are you able to build complex visualizations while maintaining eye contact with someone? Once the concept becomes complex enough, I have to break eye contact with them (usually staring at nothing above their heads) and unfocus my eyes. Once I do that, the sky’s the limit on how complex the mental visual can get and be abstracted, but something about staring at a face (reading realtime facial reactions?) consumes the part of my brain I need for the very complex visuals.

partial_accumen,

Mines constant. I can’t really make any decisions without internal debate and I have to sorta constantly keep track of things I need to this.

A new perspective from this article on the topic I haven’t heard before is that what you’re describing may not be the “inner voice” being referred to.

after work im going to do x this weekend I need to get y and z done. W needs to get done before the end of the month.

I’m going to assume your native language is English (forgive me, replace with your own native language). When you’re having this internal debate, are your points and counterpoints in actual English language with a sentence structure noun+verb+adjective? This is what I’m reading in the article they say “inner voice” is.

  • “I really need to do laundry this weekend or I won’t have any clean socks on Monday”
  • “I’m going to play football with my friends. I’m excited to work on my kicking form again.”
  • “Have I paid the electric bill? What day does that arrive? How much money do I have in my account?”

Or instead is it abstract concepts stacked on top and next to each other for comparison?

  • concept of obligation
  • playing out a scenario of the future where you wake up on Monday, open your sock drawer and find it empty
  • forecasting a sense of satisfaction from the completed task
  • calculation of consequences of not doing the task (again)
  • a slight self imposed discomfort to motivate you to complete the things to become comfortable again

According to my read of the article, the first would be the “inner voice”, the second would NOT be. I have the second, not the first. How about you?

partial_accumen,

no its totally words and sentences.

That’s amazing to me! It would be so much extra effort for me to put things in words to think on them first. The only time I do that is when I’m testing how it will sound to someone else. Even then, I’ll build the sentences, and then simulate a person hearing them in concept with what I know of the audience to see how they would receive it, and what concepts they draw from what I say. Then I adjust the words as needed to get the thoughts across to the audience.

I can’t honestly don’t know what my thoughts are outside of that except for visualizing things and like subconsicous things like hunches.

The best metaphor I can think to describe it is assembling a jigsaw puzzle. You don’t need to describe the shape of the piece to be able to find a matching piece it fits into. The shape, size, edge, color, and pattern all inform you of where it will fit. That’s kind of a hunch. This conceptual thinking works similarly. There are “attachment points” to each concept that link them together with other mental abstracted concepts. There are places that don’t fit which let you know the pieces are unrelated.

partial_accumen,

I’ve been doing it all my life though so it doesn’t really require more effort than thinking in concepts. It’s like breathing, it happens automatically but I can stop or control it if I want to.

I’ve found the opposite. The older I get, the “expensive” words are to use. The concept when in mind is so complex and nuanced, to use a word for it shaves off all that complexity and nuance and collapses the thought into the limits of the definition of that word. When it becomes a word, its…less, a mostly formed shadow of what it was. That’s the price of communicating it to others.

When I stop my inner voice I would describe my thoughts as sort of fuzzy and ephemeral. I would easily forget them or have difficulty expressing them without first putting them into words.

We operate oppositely in this, which is wonderful! For you it sounds like the thoughts don’t have meaning until you choose words and make them concrete. Like your thoughts are liquid and fluid, but you’re able to make them solid and meaningful by confining them in words. For me, I do the best I can with choosing a word, sometimes dusting off old antiques, to try to match as close as possible to the concept. Sometimes I have found words in other languages sometimes fit better because of a closer match of concepts or properties. That too has its drawbacks, as using that would lose your audience when you’re trying to communicate an idea.

partial_accumen,

I try the same and have the same result!

partial_accumen,

We’d ideally send a rock the size of Mars to collide with it. Not only would it impart spin on the planet, the ejecta would create a moon to protect the future dinosaur inhabitants from quite a few meteors. And really, haven’t dinosaurs suffered enough at the hands of meteors?

partial_accumen,

The West let it happen. They didn’t arm Ukraine quickly enough, nor did they do much of anything to help Ukraine in the decade before.

A decade before the country was run by Russian puppet Viktor Yanukovych. Any western economic or military assistance would have helped Russia continue to own Ukraine politically.

Instead they became closer pals with Russia after the annexation and even more dependent.

The hope was, and there was a lot of evidence it was working, that engaging Russia economically would act as a force against Russian aggression because no one could imagine Russia throwing away their access and economic prosperity by openly invading another country. Also, Ukraine, immediately following the exit of Yanukovych in 2014 had a lot of corruption in government with lots of Russian backed political appointees still there.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db91f94a-68d3-4151-8dca-5800a881a684.png

At the time it didn’t look like a country that could or would defend itself from Russia even if they were invaded. The taking of Crimea with almost no push-back from Ukraine, and Ukrainian military officers marking their weapons of war to Russia in exchange for Russian military command reinforced this idea.

Had they nipped this in the bud more than a decade ago, Russia wouldn’t have had the means nor the will to invade Ukraine.

Who is “they” and “nipping” it sounds like you’re suggesting would be to flood the (at the time) half corrupt country half Russian owned country with Western weapons to untrained people. 2014 was also when the USA was fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Trying in Afghanistan to build a domestic army to defend their government against the Taliban.

You’re looking at Ukraine as the Zelenskyy-era version which has this hope and promise of being a less corrupt place and fighting Russia. Zelenskyy didn’t even take office until 2019. Even then it took a couple of years to learn that he was going to be different than the previous leaders.

I say all of this, and I hugely support Ukraine today! I want more support for them from my government and others, but that doesn’t change what Ukraine was 10 or more years ago.

partial_accumen,

Who is “they” and “nipping” it sounds like you’re suggesting would be to flood the (at the time) half corrupt country half Russian owned country with Western weapons to untrained people

The Western powers, but mostly Western Europe. The Baltic states and Poland were very wary of Russia and there multiple news articles of them fearing a Russian invasion (Lithuania 2017).

The Baltic countries and Poland have been the victim of large national powers for nearly all of the 20th century. Further, NATO has strengthen the Baltics as well as Poland. How are you suggesting this changing the situation in Ukraine historically? For the point you’re making, are you treating Ukraine as a NATO member and suggesting they should have received equal treatment?

Gearing up NATO for a possible invasion to actually increase military spending for secure Baltic borders, stockpiling arms and weapons,

This happened. The Baltics only joined NATO in 2004, and today NATO members have bases and armies in these countries.

as well as gradually much harsher sanctions for Russia together with increasing economic distancing - aka a strong response, could’ve shown Russia who not to trifle with.

There were sanctions on Russia after the 2014 invasion of Crimea. Russia didn’t do anything to NATO. Geopolitically, responding militarily to a completely separate sovereign nation being invaded without that country asking for assistance would have been the exact global hegemonic response our enemies claim we are.

The former USSR states said multiple times that Russia wouldn’t recognize much apart force.

And today NATO countries are still free with zero Russian soldiers on them. I’d like it to stay that way.

The Nord Stream pipeline was beyond idiotic.

I’ve already addressed this. The West was trying to engage Russia economically strengthening ties to Russia to give them something to lose if they went to war again.

After signing the Paris agreement in 2015, agreeing to get more gas into the EU and from Russia of all parties, was just dumb. The dependency created was more on European side than Russian side.

Russia is largely a petro-state. If you’re trying to build economic ties with them you have to have mutual trade. Natural resources are one of the few things Russia has to sell. Further, the goal of switching to natural gas was to switch to cleaner energy generation for Europe than coal. In that, it was successful.

Russia started testing its own internet and tried producing its own chips for Russian “independence”, but after the annexation how could that not be interpreted as preparation for disconnection from Western tech?

India is also launching its own semiconductor research and manufacturing capacity right now. source Are you suggesting its planning to disconnect from Western tech?

Probably the situation was complex back then and even more complex today, but the reality is that to many people the attack on Ukraine was not a surprise but a matter of time.

Yes, there were voices saying we should cut off and isolate Russia instead of engage in the early 2000s. Think of the consequences. Doing so would have also handed Ukraine to Russia on a silver platter. There never would have been an invasion of Ukraine in Feb 2022. With zero consequences, why would Russia have stopped at Crimea in 2014?

partial_accumen,

It took me a moment to connect the image on the cover is goose stepping

partial_accumen, (edited )

3 years imprisonment for domestic terrorism

No imprisonment for this guy. 3 years in prison PLUS 3 years probation.

However, there were 3 people involved according to the article. We don’t know exactly how involved this one guy is.

edit: corrected my mistaken reading

partial_accumen,

You’re right. edited my post

partial_accumen,

I bet he didn’t even throw a few bucks in his commissary account so that Pete could get a block of ramen.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • InstantRegret
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • everett
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines