Thank you @fosstodon for making my favorite space on the web--I find it to be an actually worthwhile social media space filled with many similar minded, helpful, and warm people.
Here's to more free and open source software in 2024!
Please reply if you're willing to alpha test, code review, or otherwise check out my first private release of my hypercard-like game engine (#haskell).
I will open source it, but it's very messy, though, I feel like that's just superficial messiness, and the architecture is something I'm kind of proud of.
Yes that's right, I think I can push out a Christmas release tomorrow!
I also have a bunch of Debian server "administration" Markdown files I made which may be helpful to others. I started going wild on prepping my server, which lead to this project: https://github.com/someodd/gopherdashboard (#gopherprotocol server dashboard).
Every now and then on the #restic forum: "Hi I was wondering if anyone has experience with large datasets of x magnitude?"
reply: I am using that order of magnitude no problem
reply: someone posted last week that they are backing up an order of magnitude greater
reply: here's a link where #CERN is backing up 2.5 billion files, 19Pb
May have child nodes in a field by itself, or in a Maybe, or list!
... recursively through the potential tree find all fields that end in "Foo" and get the fields corresponding value (fields ending in "Foo" are always String).
@shapr basically thanks to you, I was sort of inspired to get nix/flake working for my project I'm working on, but it's not a big focus for me at the moment.
I think it took me a long time to feel good about my development speed in Haskell because I kept trying to do things "the old way," basically a not very functional programming kind of way. I was very stuck in the mindset (sorry if I butcher these terms) dynamic typing, imperative and procedural programming. I haven't felt like I have made progress overcoming this until this project where I set out to put the architecture in the way of types, first. It was amazing to me how in doing so the rest..
.. of the program easily came forth. And everything was so loosely coupled and a clear separation between data and logic or the like. I feel like Haskell is really great at "architecture as code" which I'm not sure exactly how I mean this, I know you can potentially make clear a software's architecture in any language, but I just feel like there's something about Haskell that makes it so much more explicit and charming or something.
@alcinnz I love Haskell so much. Even if that was a joke, maybe it would be interesting to do something that's not only functional, but also like Annabelle or something that's primarily used for proofs or something (if I understand that correctly)?