@Sherifazuhur@israel@palestine I will grant that Al Jazeera shows corpses. If more news outlets were as graphic there might not be such an appetite for destruction.
@Scmurcott@Sherifazuhur@israel@palestine who supports genocide? You're demonizing anyone not in lockstep with this apartheid narrative. Those with credentials far in excess of your own have noted that where South Africa makes their argument that they've unduly limited the scope of context.
@Scmurcott@nicholas_saunders@palestine@israel No Palestinian who actually lives under Israel’s apartheid system (along with many of other nationalities) has denied the comparison to South Africa. Separate schools, medical systems, roads, laws, access to justice, rights to free press & free speech etc The ongoing genocide is possible due to the accrual of statutory discrimination and the acceptance of extralegal, inhumane practices.
@nicholas_saunders@Sherifazuhur@palestine@israel the UK and US governments have sent huge amounts of logistical and weapon support towards the ongoing slaughter. I the brainwashing of Jewish children to hate Arabs in Israeli schools is child abuse as much as the child trafficking of Palestinian children. Many media outlets have ignored the context of Gaza, the massacres and the ground invasion of Rafa. Peaceful protestors were recently brutalised on campuses in the US. The US security forces who violently body slammed an elderly female Jewish ethics professsor are defending this genocide.
@Scmurcott@Sherifazuhur@palestine@israel no, you don't know me, Stephen, and yet you haven't let that stop you from taking a morally superior tone while implying I'm immoral -- which says everything about you.
@Sherifazuhur@nicholas_saunders@palestine@israel the lack of transformation in some parts of South Africa and the way people are excluded from the economy because of the history of Apartheid has not been resolved. The exploitative relationships between other countries and Africa have not ended.
so you're all-in on this narrative of an apartheid state, then? As argued by South Africa at The Hague?
Because it's an unduly constrained scope of context as pointed out by credentialed individuals. Now, if you think that South Africa has the horses for then argument, then good luck and godspeed, but in the real world it's not the prosecution, or equivalent here, who unilaterally sets the context.
Add comment