Why, ignoring the bullshit censoring, does it not just refuse to return results but feel it needs to lecture you on top of it?
It could have just returned anything near the results ignoring the word ‘girl’ but no, it has to tell you you are bad and why. Fucking judgemental piece of shit on top of bullshit censorship.
No, that’s why content moderation employing a braindead AI and half-baked algorithms is a bad idea. If (and that’s a GIGANTIC if) it was possible to have real humans checking stuff without destroying privacy, aggressive content moderation would be fine. Of course, I’m ignoring stuff like censorship, thoughtpolicing and government-backed oppression as that’s a whole other factory of cans of worms.
Not necessarily AI, but needs to be handled automatically by software–its far too much for human moderation to be the norm unless you assume masses of completely unpaid labor.
Yet you try to report that user who has listed 530 S/M sex toys in the marketplace including huge anal hooks, horse dildos and nipple pitchers, but they reply that they dont see anything wrong here. Even when you ask them to go through the report one more time.
I am personally not against sex toys but more against their double standards of their bot moderation being over protective while they ignore humans reporting rule breaches
Any listing promoting the sale or use of adult products and services is not allowed in Facebook Marketplace. This includes but is not limited to:
Sexual products (i.e., toys, enhancement) Videos or Shows for adult entertainment Exceptions:
Content educating or discussing family planning and contraception. Including its affordability and accessibility.
yet you report any that you see and get annoyed when your reports don’t lead to removals? Idk to me it kinda does sound like you have a problem with them.
I don’t think it’s dead Internet theory. But this is more dystopian in that private corporations are censoring our speech and searching based on their own criteria.
I find csam repulsive, but having a corporation or ai restrict unrelated content because their system construes an innocent search as potential bad is almost worst.
Lady does sound like an older woman. Gal, woman or chick would probably work, but that’s all besides the point, it’s very common to use <whatever> girl as a search term: biker girl, skater girl, ring girl, bikini girl, racer girl, etc. It’s just dumb to automatically assume any search with “girl” means “child”.
Idk, I’m 31 and my girlfriend is 27. I don’t call her my woman friend or lady friend, and calling her my girlfriend doesn’t really make her sound underage to me
Especially since “woman friend” and “lady friend” specifically mean “friend who is a female, no romantic entanglement” or “I’m specifically NOT using the word girlfriend here.”
Which does expose kind of a scar on the language; the terms we have for unmarried romantic partners are inherently juvenile, which puts 50 year olds who are dating in the awkward position of calling each other boy and/or girl. Or you get to spit out all ten chapters of the phrase “significant other.”
Maybe because I’m older idk, but boy and girl make me think of children.
I’m so old that I don’t sprinkle my comments with kid-pidgin like ‘idk’, and I don’t equate ‘girl’ with ‘young girl’. Bat Girl, Girl Friday, Ring Girl, “I married a girl right out of college”; it’s about context.
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think warning people they might expose themselves to csam meets the definition of “broke the internet”. I bet if you replace “girl” with “woman” you’ll get the expected results.
Do you offer a TV channel for Turkish geezers? It is basically their ancestral pastime to watch maintenance machines work. Women are a sinful addition, though, but a silently welcome one.
Funnily enough, wanted to just find one of those reels where the girl sits on the gas tank in front, legs pincered over the guy, because I wanted to show it to my girlfriend as a thing to do 😄
There is no child porn in Utah. Don't acknowledge it, and it simply ceases to exist. Of course banning teens from using social media at all is the obvious solution, and kids never think about sexual things or have such feelings. It's always liberal California-born adults trying to do things such as that to them. Most kids don't ever have any desire to grow up and have sex.
Add comment