CumBroth,
@CumBroth@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Among other things: Cooking. They’re really helpful in those situations where I have a bunch of ingredients lying around in my pantry but I lack concrete recipes that can make a proper meal out of them.

General_Effort,

That’s good. I have to tr…ohmygoddidittellyoutomakecumbroth

Krauerking,

The idea of an imagined recipe based on random ingredients from a thing that doesn’t understand the concept of taste seems like a “recipe” for some really gross food.

weariedfae,

I would love a local one to use for the same things as CharGpt only I want to control the knowledge training dataset so only quality data is in it.

I do not have the resources or knowledge to pull this off but it would be really nice to not worry about garbage-in-garbage-out.

7uWqKj,

Nothing. Remember that bartender from the original Star Wars?

Kolanaki,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

Brainstorming ideas; it’s something to bounce ideas off and see what can be tweaked.

Single-player D&D. Can setup multiple players/characters and a DM and just play D&D by myself, which is rad.

Having conversations with fictional characters. Like Data from Star Trek.

Jarix,

Okay ive seen this kind of usage now 3 or 4 times and im at a complete loss how that even works.

Starting to feel very out of touch with reality :(

Edit: meant to say technology not reality but im just gonna leave the correction as this edit

Kolanaki,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

How which one works?

Jarix,

I cant fathom how to playtest dnd with it. That concept does not compute.

I think ide have to see it in action

Kolanaki,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

Oh I’m not playtesting, I’m straight up playing the game using the AI as the DM and 3 other players. I’m using an AI that can pretend to be multiple characters at once and then they’re trained on the rules of the game as well as just having general writing ability to create actions their characters take, while also having a dice-roller integrated into it.

It’s more imaginative than how most play, using a map and minis; this is entirely text and RNG numbers for dice. Imagine doing an RP session in a Discord chat and you’ll get the idea. Just instead of real people, it’s AI (except for myself).

The genius of it is that even if the AI misinterpreted the rules, it’s still like playing with real people since they do that too! lol

Krauerking,

That sounds lonely.

MeatsOfRage,

Coding.

The other day I needed to set up a node service with an HTML front-end that allows me to upload files from a browser that end up on my machine hosted in a docker container. Something like this would take me the better part of a day to complete. Through a series of prompts I got what I needed deployed in less than an hour.

Then unit tests. Sometimes all I need is good code coverage and since it’s just tests you can verify the quality of the generated code if it runs and covers the lines you want. I’ve saved a ton of hours of tedious code coverage work this way.

Interstellar_1,
@Interstellar_1@pawb.social avatar

I use GPT 4 for checking Physics Problems quickly. It’s much better than education forums nowadays where you have to sign up and probably pay a subscription to be able to view questions

BaroqueInMind,

Do you pay for the GPT-4 API or use Copilot?

Interstellar_1,
@Interstellar_1@pawb.social avatar

I use copilot in a private Firefox container

WeLoveCastingSpellz,

porn

zakobjoa,
@zakobjoa@lemmy.world avatar

I occasionally use LLMs to generate a set of characters for a TTRPG, if I don’t have the time to prepare and/or know we’ll play a very limited scenario in terms of who my PCs are able to meet. This is especially true for oneshots where I just don’t want to put too much work in.

I recently built a scenario for a cthulhu themed scenario, that was set in a 1920s Louisiana prison and planned for two to three sessions. I just had an LLM do a list of all the prisoners and guards on the PCs block, with a few notes on the NPCs look and character. This drastically reduced the time I had to put in preparing the scenario.

Klnsfw,

The only use I have for AIs is to translate from my mother tongue into English, to chat online. I could write directly in English, but it hasn’t been worth it for a few years.

TipRing,

I used openAI/whisper to transcribe several thousand .wav files full of human speech (running locally). Much faster than trying to listen to them myself. It wasn’t perfect but the error rate was within acceptable levels.

ensignrolaren,

I used ChatGPT this morning to create a Firefox extension for my favorite website (to allow me to speed up audio playback as desired.) just a few minutes’ back-and-forth and it works perfectly. If you’ve got a favorite site with a UI that you r always wanted slightly tweaked, you could try making a browser extension to do that!

tiefling,

I use it a lot for random memes and shit, like rewriting All Stars to be about hot dogs.

I also use it to edit my creative writing, mostly just tone and grammar

Kase,

Literally the only time I’ve used one, I was upset about something and just wanted somebody to talk to. Sooo I vented to chat gpt. ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

It felt sorta like talking to a therapist, except its tone was very formal/polite and every once in a while it asked you to choose between two different responses (for training or whatever), which would be pretty strange for a human to do.

somnuz, (edited )

I don’t know if that’s so weird, mostly when someone is venting to me, I pause them and ask “do you need to be heard and express whatever you need to express or do you seek someone to process the things that you vent about with and actually talk about it?” — surprisingly this question makes a big difference and changes the overall tone dramatically…

AlexanderESmith,
AlexanderESmith avatar

Absolutely nothing, because they all give fucking useless results. Hallucinates, is confidently wrong, and isn't even grammatically competent (depending on the model). Not even good for a draft, because I'd have to completely rewrite it anyway.

LLMs are only as good as the guys training it (who are mostly morons), and the raw data they train on (which is mostly unaudited random shit).

And that's just regular language. Coding? Hah!

Me: Generate some code to [do a thing].
LLM: [Gives me code]
Me: [Some part] didnt work.
LLM: Try [this] instead.
Me: That didn't work either.
LLM: Try [the first thing] again.
Me: ... that still doesn't work...
LLM: Oh, sorry. Try [the second thing again].
Me: ...

Loop continues forever.

One time I found out about a built-in function that I didn't know about (in LLM generated code that didn't work), and read the manual for it, and rewrote the code from scratch to get it working. Literally the only useful thing it ever gave me was a single word (that it probably found on Superuser or StackExchange in the first place).

Passerby6497,

Wow, you get two whole answers?! Lucky, I just get the same goddamned response repeatedly until I yell at it or until it gives up.

GBU_28,

Skill issue. You have to know a bit about the topic and prompt it right.

It’s for boilerplate where you can scan it for errors with your dev ability

AlexanderESmith,
AlexanderESmith avatar

An interesting theory, except I know exactly how to do everything I've ever asked an LLM about. I would never trust one of these things to generate useful copy/code, I just wanted to see what it could do. It's been shit 100% of the time. Never even gotten a useful function out of it.

Also "skill issue" is a lazy response. Try reading the post before you reply next time.

GBU_28,

I did read it.

You can create great and very useable boilerplate with even gpt 3.5 …

You have a skill issue with your prompts.

AlexanderESmith,
AlexanderESmith avatar

If I can't use the LLM by prompting it the same way I'd prompt one of my colleagues, then it's not a skill issue; It's shitty LLM. I don't care if it's the input embedder, training data, or the guy who didn't bother properly building a model that didn't just spit out bullshit.

If an employee gave me this quality, I'd get rid of them. Why would I waste my time on a shit coder, artificial or otherwise?

GBU_28,

Sorry, but holding spicy autocomplete to the same rigor you’d hold a human coworker is probably the beginning of your issue. It’s clear your prompt is not working.

AlexanderESmith,
AlexanderESmith avatar

Well, considering the speed of your responses, and your obsession with making excuses for shitty software, I'm guessing you're and LLM, so I'm gonn start ignoring you too. Good luck surviving the hype phase.

GBU_28,

I’m currently browsing this website, any page interaction results in a notification by the inbox.

You too reply quickly, thus, are also a robot.

Edit I’m not excusing shitty software, I acknowledged the types of tasks it’s appropriate for from the beginning.

I’m highlighting a shitty user lol

poopsmith,
@poopsmith@lemmy.world avatar

I use it all the time to help simplify long excerpts, giving me an introductory gist of what something says.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • tester
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines